gnu-nobody

@petStorm No, I just sometimes check every chat room of cgcc because I'm bored

Ok, apparently they can. I just accidentally separated them with commas instead of semicolons

Can functions have more than 3 arguments in K?

Does K have the concept of conjunctions in J? Or do adverbs simply work all the time?

Let's say I have a 4-D array, and want to add a matrix to all its elements (producing a 6D array) (I admit this is not a very useful thing though)

Does K have a rank conjunction (dyadic " in J)? If no, how can it reproduce the behavior?

tbh I find J's parsing rules quite neat (idk apl though)

Afaik J for example does not evaluate until it sees the thing on the left

But I still can't make sure if looking at 3 elements is sufficient

Well, actually I don't treat higher order functions as different parts of speech, instead there are "code blocks" which are basically gerunds in j and functions can take them as arguments and do stuff with them

oh

is dop an irrelevant function?

Hello, I'm currently working on a language which is very similar to J, but I'm lost at one thing: I don't have precedence change for higher order functions (conjunctions and adverbs), do I still need to look at the top 4 elements of the stack or is only looking at 3 sufficient?

even though i dont know about conjunctions yet

thanks

hmm

user202729, I know about the IOI, what about it?

n=2,x=3,y=6; answer = 5 ([3,3],[4,4],[5,5],[6,6],[3,6]) there may be lists i missed

i think i generated a test case, but im not sure if i missed something

unrelated to the challenge, i would like to know how to solve it efficiently

do you know how to solve it in fast time

the subtask i hardcoded was 1<=n<=5 and 1<=x<=y<=10

and i recall an example testcase with y= 10^9 or greater than that

because it wanted the output modulo 10^9 +7

the restriction on the input must have been big

i am trying to say

i do not recall exactly but it wanted the number modulo 10^9 + 7 so it must be big

rip i forgot codegolf terminology while i was not here

can you guys help me with my new question on sandbox

thanks

my question is, why can we not define a function/verb with more than 2 arguments in J (or can we and i dont know?)

i have a question about the j language and had nowhere else to ask it but here because SO has so few j questions but there are quite a bit J golfers.

hello

hmm

why did i get 100 rep on here, so and chess

ok, ill do my homework while waiting for other solutions

done

yes, only canonical forms will be used

hmm

that is why 11 and 100 both represent 3, but 100 is more correct

i do not think i know what canonical form means

ok, i'll reedit it to include the link

i had linked

so if a program outputs something different for 11 and 3 for 100 is a true program, but if it outputs 3 to 11 but does not output 3 to 100, it is not correct

yeah but the second one is more correct

i'll be doing my physics homework, but the computer will be open, so i'll probably see any suggestions in like 2-3 mins

ill move to main if noone says something

codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/a/16973/80227 last minute post

also, idea: ppcg discord server