Striving to be a selfless positive influence on others in any way you're capable of - that has no match in religion, and that would be the point of life for someone nonreligious. You'd be of no use to humanity if you killed yourself. Think about that.
All Windows computers have IE, and all Mac OS X computers have Safari. Is that justification enough to support these two browsers first? I mean shouldn't it be based on what's more widely used rather than what's more readily available?
Don't they trust Firefox or Chrome or other competing browsers to let the websites function properly? Is there still an industrial-level mistrust on alternative browsers a user may install? (I would suppose tech support for a user on Mac would instruct the user to use Safari, which is IE's equivalent on OS X)
Of course you only see such messages in sites from early 2000s that are still around, but then if you call customer support related to many sites and tell them you're using Firefox or Chrome, their first response is "Please use Internet Explorer.". Are veteran web developers still making and maintaining sites to function properly on Internet Explorer first?
Something that baffled me but can't really ask as a question (it's opinion-based). Why do many web based companies prioritize Internet Explorer over other browsers? Quite often I find small fine print in sites saying "This site is best viewed on Internet Explorer with 1024 x 768 resolution."
oh, looks like the split vote count shows it. i can indeed see the actual negative score for a candidate using this feature even if the final score is just shown as no less than -1
actually i meant to refer to your point "negative votes are recorded not displayed". unless the script can query SE servers and fetch the negative vote count, it only has the information in the page code. the question is, does the page code have the negative vote counts even if they are not displayed?
Never mind, figured it out. Right-click > Inspect Element > Console > Paste > Press Enter =) But I think there are bugs. Negative votes show as positive.
I also found out that if you use javaw, the System.out.println does not print to the command window. You have to use the java command for that. It will probably not allow your GUI to run, but it can show you that the arguments are working correctly.
Sorry, please change if (args.length == 1) { to if (args.length >= 1) { so that it works even if more than one argument is supplied (the other arguments will be ignored).
Here is the problem, the args array will have zero length if there are no arguments. You will need to have proper checks for the length of the array. Please try these in your main method (along with the necessary GUI stuff that would come before this code):
Btw, does anything in your new myMethod depend on anything else? For example, does it have to wait for something to be setup, something that will surely be setup when user does File > Open, but may not be set up when the main method is executing on program start?