Anyway, I'm now down 2 votes because of a previous version of the question. I'm of half mind to delete it (eventually, if I don't have enough rep on MY now) and re-post. 馃槵
I'm overreacting at this point, but it's a pet peeve when folks point out network policy or how to formulate a question. This was a case of a community rule that I thought was counterintuitive.
I've been on Stack Overflow since long before SE 2.0 launched. I'm well acquainted with the rules, and it's silly every time someone says "read the rules."
@MonicaCellio The age of account is relevant if the account was created during your given range. Although maybe clamping the rang start to to the latest creation date of all of the accounts being compared is the solution.
In 驻专拽 诪讝, 驻住讜拽 讜, Paroah says to Joseph:
状...讜讗诐 讬讚注转 讜讬砖 讘诐 讗谞砖讬-讞讬诇 讜砖诪转诐 砖专讬 诪拽谞讛 注诇-讗砖专-诇讬.状
"If you know and there are capable men among you, appoint them as managers over my livestock which is mine."
In the very next verse, we are told:
状讜讬讘讗 讬讜住祝 讗转 讬注拽讘 讗讘讬讜 讜讬注诪讚讛讜 诇驻谞讬 驻专注...
In 驻专拽 诪讝, 驻住讜拽 讜, Paroah says to Joseph:
状...讜讗诐 讬讚注转 讜讬砖 讘诐 讗谞砖讬-讞讬诇 讜砖诪转诐 砖专讬 诪拽谞讛 注诇-讗砖专-诇讬.状
"If you know and there are capable men among you, appoint them as managers over my livestock which is mine."
In the very next verse, we are told:
状讜讬讘讗 讬讜住祝 讗转 讬注拽讘 讗讘讬讜 讜讬注诪讚讛讜 诇驻谞讬 驻专注...