David Aranovsky

Jan 14 14:02
As I said, it is something that you will have to reconcile with yourself.. enjoy!
Jan 14 14:02
Please stay focused on c
Jan 14 14:02
linking Wikipedia will not give shelter. the onus in on you to prove how this perfectly justifiable assembly is a numerology..
Jan 14 14:02
@kaya3 then we shall marvel in this paradox, humanity has never seen!
Jan 14 14:02
Dear @kaya3 you are not challenging us, you are challenging your own intuition. The onus falls on you to reconcile this supposed "coincidence". We are not theorists, we are REVEALERS..
Jan 14 14:02
@kaya3 approximation is not determination
Jan 14 14:02
precision is not accuracy
Jan 14 14:02
or is it vice versa?
Jan 14 14:02
@kaya3 both arbitrarily derived from speed of light
Jan 14 14:02
@MauroALLEGRANZA math is not a speculation, but relativity is.. determinism is the missing link
 
Nov 1, 2024 00:48
house of cards: last several decades of theoretical physics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2p_Hlm6aCok
Oct 29, 2024 01:59
I dont need to hear lies from experts, I come to my own conclusions
Oct 29, 2024 01:49
Actually believing in loss of info is a cultish stance these day.. it was mainstream for almost 30 years.. also, the entire cosmology field is purely speculative, where the best theories are being flushed down the drain after decades of govt funding.. so your highbrowing me with "read a book", it's analogous to when a muslim tells me to talk to an imam if I want to learn about islam..
Oct 28, 2024 21:09
ok, as soon as you give params on SMBH
Oct 28, 2024 14:49
ok, vax.. good luck convincing me with that..
Oct 28, 2024 14:47
"controlgroup
controlgroup
9374
10:42
I mean, sure, if you want to go search to find a scientist elitist cult,"
Oct 28, 2024 14:46
I didnt say leader, I said member.. you mentioned that scientists who believe in Info preservation are elitists, no?
Oct 28, 2024 14:45
So Susskind is an elitist cult member?
Oct 28, 2024 04:36
regarding the argument of "info loss" being resolved

Wikipedia's Nuanced Stance: The article’s tone aligns with the cautious language typical in scientific summaries, acknowledging that while many physicists believe information is preserved, exact mechanisms and consensus on a final resolution are still being investigated. It highlights open questions and active areas of inquiry, which is why it emphasizes that the paradox remains an active area of research.

Broader Field Perspective: The broader scientific perspective outside the Wikipedia article suggests a trend toward information pres
Oct 28, 2024 04:00
a bit about me: I have a BS in Biochem and I work as a SWDev/Architect for many years. Have been reading up on cosmology, quantum mech and etc for ears.. but who cares..
Oct 28, 2024 03:59
I just published this, if you be so kind as to give your valued feedback. I don't have any other Graduate Phys student friends :)
Oct 28, 2024 03:52
Trust Science!
We no longer have SH, but we do have His Majesty Dr Fauchi (sp) :)))
Oct 28, 2024 03:51
the same people who brought up Man Caused Global Warming.. Man Caused CFC Ozone depletion and Covid Vaccines+Booostaaahs :)
Oct 28, 2024 03:49
you have inspired me to write many more articles to keep digging up more fallacies in this so called "sci comm" cult :))
Oct 28, 2024 03:49
these are discrete features of a BH, but their manifistation is nuanced, not based on any discrete scalar. This is a fundamental dilemma in assigning a category with distinct attributes to a fluid or "qualitative" measure..
Oct 28, 2024 03:41
here is the significance of needing to know the threshold for SMBH
Location in Galactic Centers
SMBHs are usually located at the centers of galaxies, where they play a crucial role in galaxy formation, structure, and dynamics.
2. Influence on Galaxy Evolution
Through powerful jets, radiation, and outflows (especially in active galactic nuclei), SMBHs can regulate star formation and impact the overall shape and development of their host galaxies.
3. Accretion Disks and Brightness
When actively feeding, SMBHs form enormous, luminous accretion disks, creating quasars and other types of active
Oct 28, 2024 03:38
so while SMBHs are not as hot as non SMBHs, woud emit less HR, but the HR emited by SMBHs would linger for longer, giving more hopium of discovery to SH and his minions :))))
Oct 28, 2024 03:31
im digging deeper, and I am finding this: although there doesnt seem to be any vast documentation on SH involvement with SMBH, the fact that the SMBH would provide more evidence to support HR theory, I doubt that SH would have ignored them.. so in a way I am partially ritght about SH and SMBH's, he would def use them as props to expidite the evidence for HR.. amazing! :)))
Oct 28, 2024 03:01
but other then that, I stand behind my position
Oct 28, 2024 03:00
@controlgroup I stand corrected on my misinformation, I was wrong about SH applying exceptionalism to SMBH. and you are correct, he applied the "info destruction" theory to all BHs
Oct 28, 2024 02:42
thanks, and as I mentioned, as soon as you can define the min size of a SMBH, I will buy every SciFi book that SH ever wrote :)))
Oct 28, 2024 02:39
ok. well, we had a nice debate.. we stayed respectful and civil :) thank you for your participation
Oct 28, 2024 02:38
ok, what program, grad theoretical phys?
Oct 28, 2024 02:36
no disrespect intended
Oct 28, 2024 02:36
and what school?
Oct 28, 2024 02:36
im just curious, what is your level of ed?
Oct 28, 2024 02:30
not*
Oct 28, 2024 02:29
ok, then define what point you would net be traveling alot
Oct 28, 2024 02:29
ill update my article with the Qualitative Cosmic Trinity Of SH hahaha
Oct 28, 2024 02:28
for example, if i as you, how many miles you traveled today, you say alot, i say how much is alot.. and you say its qualitative.. hahahaha
Oct 28, 2024 02:27
if it doesnt mean, it shouldnt have a special label.. and if it does, we need to quantify it
Oct 28, 2024 02:26
large boulder means nothing.. if we are gonna study different properties of bolders we wuld need to get the threshold of these
Oct 28, 2024 02:25
age, height, distance, weight, time etc
Oct 28, 2024 02:24
its strange that we apply discrete scalars to almost everything except to black holes
Oct 28, 2024 02:23
btw, did we skip over massive? looks like we went fron small to super massive.. now we have more problems on our hands.. we must add more and more thresholds
Oct 28, 2024 02:21
its a scam, and you are part of it.. but hey, it pays the bills
Oct 28, 2024 02:21
oh, i see now, that you out it is simple terms for my simple mind to understand.. makes all he sense now :)))
Oct 28, 2024 02:20
hahahahaha