Stack Exchange
log in

clabacchio

 2020 Electrical Engineering Moderator…

Open Discussion for electronics.stackexchange.com/election/4
clabacchio
May 28, 2020 06:56
@AdamL Adam, this chat is to discuss the moderators' elections, please don't get off topic too much
clabacchio
May 19, 2020 07:22
@VoltageSpike at this link in the elections page electronics.stackexchange.com/election/nomination-edit/4/7348
 

 Electrical Engineering

A place to talk with friends from the EE community about vacuu...
clabacchio
Dec 10, 2018 16:23
anyone round here?
clabacchio
Dec 10, 2018 16:23
hi all
clabacchio
Oct 10, 2018 13:48
@PlasmaHH rocket salad
 

 EE - Ask a Moderator

A place to ask those little questions that a moderator can hel...
clabacchio
Oct 10, 2018 16:05
@IanTompkins I'm saying this to not confuse you, you're not at fault here
clabacchio
Oct 10, 2018 16:04
(not the topic itself but the closure of your question)
clabacchio
Oct 10, 2018 16:03
@IanTompkins Just to inform you, this is a matter of discussion among us mods, we are sorting it out
clabacchio
Sep 21, 2018 14:43
@Passerby WRT that post, honestly (I may be wrong) I see more a dispute between the two of you than a personal attack. Perhaps you could just ignore each other
clabacchio
Sep 21, 2018 14:36
@Passerby same for me, I didn't get the ping, sorry...I'm not up to date but I'll check
 

 Discussion between Snoopy and Trevor_G

Imported from a comment discussion on electronics.stackexchang...
clabacchio
Feb 5, 2018 16:03
No problem!
clabacchio
Feb 5, 2018 16:02
The rest of a discussion can be found at: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/72724/…
 

 Discussion on answer by Johny Radio: …

Imported from a comment discussion on electronics.stackexchang...
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:42
if you want we can talk again later
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:42
k back to work
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:41
again, that is my opinion but could help you understand the criticism
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:41
otherwise it's just 'because'
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:41
that accuracy is necessary only if you need it
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:40
and also as experiment
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:40
I mean as analog S&H
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:39
not arguing, but consider it
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:39
it's 0.25%, it seems a little too much for a didactical example
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:39
anyways, I've just read the 250ppm bit
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:39
yes I think it would be great
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:38
with practical evidence
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:37
that would really stand well as an independent answer
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:37
I'm glad you got a solution, I'd encourage you to post a new answer if/when you try to implement one
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:35
it's not bad per se indeed, but try to use some moderation
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:35
but to do both with 5 answers is a bit over the top in my opinion
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:34
anyways, I followed Andy's suggestion and merged the answers, it's true that one can post multiple answers, and that you can answer your own question
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:33
@JohnyRadio you're inferring :)
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:29
anyways, if you talk about economically disadvantaged and no coding, why would you propose creating an ASIC?
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:28
sure it clarifies the reason why you don't want a uC
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:27
to me, the message of the question as stated would be that the easiest solution goes through digital storage
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:26
but there are better ways and worse ways
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:26
and encouraged
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:26
critiquing is acceptable of course
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:25
if you add unstated constraints or 'undermine' otherwise valid answers because they don't fit your mindset, you discourage people from helping
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:24
but understand that answers are not just for you, and are meant to be useful to other people as well
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:23
I understand it can be frustrating, and I've dealt often with this kind of reaction
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:23
I think that you asked a fair question, and it wasn't nice that you got 'bashed' regarding using a microcontroller
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:22
"you don't offer any math or estimates on how long, or how much loss, relative to the size of the cap, so that's not so helpful."
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:21
"
Hi Trevor, thx for info. But, the SE "what to ask" and "what not to ask" pages emphasize practicality. This answer does not seem to offer an actionable analog solution. "
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:20
"This answer seems to get most votes for the fun photo. There are practical solutions getting pushed down by this answer due to a fun photo"
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:20
"i appreciate the info in this answer, but i'm confused by all the upvotes-- it does not seem to contain an analog solution"
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:19
"attitude"
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:11
I think that attitude won't get you much help and appreciation from other users
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:11
besides, some of them go against the constraints you put when you received the first answers from other users
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:10
the reason I've grouped our answers was because some of them were just abstract ideas and not really worth to be considered as answers
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:09
@JohnyRadio I'm sorry you got it this way, but the whole question/answer is becoming noisy and unuseful
clabacchio
Nov 22, 2017 13:08
How would you go for recharging the capacitor? You're better served by using a uC then