msarchet

thanks

It might be since I'm loading it through pathogen

yea no problem

seems like it probably is

because everything was working fine this morning

any reason that you could think of that the paths would be wrong

yea, that's working fine

or the GUI all yeild the new file

opening directly via NERDTree, or the open command

Yes it does, I can open it in any other editor and it works fine

I have administrator access on my machine

@BloodPhilia yea it says [new file]

having some trouble with all of my files opening blank

Anyone in here familiar with Vim?

lol

no makes sense

yea

But I don't understand why it wouldn't work with dynamic ports and the way that it should be set up for named instances. Unless that's just intended behavior to not work with dynamic ports and a firewall

Yea if I turn off dynamic ports and set it to 1433 it works

Well on every other machine I've used it can do this with just the 1433, and the 1434 rules

but let me try it

I shouldn't have to do that

yea but I don't want to have to do that

I my messages vanished but looks like you saw them

Sorry I think my chat is messed up

Well that's what SQL browser is supposed to do for you

It's a named instance so it doesn't use 1433, and that's what SQL Browser is supposed to do

well

but I checked

yea that's what I thought at first

brand new machine

I just did the installs yesterday afternoon

nope

just one named instance on 2008 R2

nope

However if I set up a rule to allow all incoming TCP connections it works

with Error 26 (the network related error)

Well I have the incoming ports set up 1433 TCP and 1434 UDP, and sqlbrowser get's the connectiong (see by using sqlbrowser.exe -c) but the client fails to connect

Anyone around that could help me figure out a sql named instance firewall issue

@GeorgeStocker you can still write about it again

@GeorgeStocker Jon skeet doesn't sleep

@RhysGibson I am

\

@RhysGibson why do you think I'm here...

This is the most people that I have ever seen in a single chat

@rchern probably because they wanted to discuss things that don't exist yet

@JoelSpolsky yea. I think in itself it a good idea because it gets us programmers thinking about things that don't have the deterministic answers and it gives us somewhere to ask questions that are harder for non-programmers (or technical minded people) to answer

@JoelSpolsky rather

Joel how do you feel about the programmers site?

ha