I was relatively easily able to prove it as a lemma using distributive property (A OR NOT A) AND (A OR B) —> (A AND A) OR (NOT A AND A) OR (A OR B) OR (NOT A OR B) @JoeShmo
so, here's what I got: A OR ((NOT A) AND B) = (A OR NOT A) AND (A OR B) = 1 AND (A OR B) = A OR B
Interesting that my teacher didn't give me this part of the distributive property - to be fair it looks really familiar, almost like a De Morgan's Law sort of thing, but I don't know exactly where I last saw it
okay, so i'm doing a little boolean algebra for computer science, and i'm stuck on this one question. basically, it's asking me to prove A or ((not A) and B) is equal to A or B using only properties. does anyone know where i should start? i've been trying to use Double Complement and Distributive Property, but i'm not sure that's the right way to go.
Sorry for interrupting, i just have absolutely no idea where to go.
However, I'm wondering, how exactly should I convince my classmates that this is worth talking about? After all, despite the fact that a sixth of the world's population died, it was a millennium in the past. How should I connect my lesson to the present? Any help would be appreciated.
I'm in a high school history class, and my capstone is to do a one-day lesson on a topic of my choice. I've chosen the relationship between Tang China and the Central Asian oasis states, with the An Lushan revolt as my main focus.
Spyfall
The Time Machine
Spyfall
The Time Machine