Oct 7, 2024 23:28
@SimonFarnsworth If one of those gets upset, they can go jump in a lake of acid.
Oct 7, 2024 06:08
(Don't expect a response from me for the next 14 hours or so - going to bed.)
Oct 7, 2024 06:07
Pinging @wizzwizz4 now that the answer and question've both been expanded.
Oct 7, 2024 06:05
@StephenKitt No need to be sorry about it! (Also, question now expanded.)
Oct 6, 2024 21:18
@wizzwizz4 Hello, Nothing! I'm Vikki.
Oct 6, 2024 21:17
...That explains the close-reopen-close cycle that just popped up in my notifications. :-þ
Oct 6, 2024 21:16
Oof.
Oct 6, 2024 21:16
Does it just default to doing that, or is that the only close reason it's possible to give when closing-with-comment?
Oct 6, 2024 21:11
(gah that sounded more imperious than I was aiming for)
Oct 6, 2024 21:11
Until we know whether Stephen Kitt'd prefer me to ask a new question to avoid invalidating his existing answer (aka the reason I was wanting to hold off on including the 9x-in-general elements in the question), yes please.
Oct 6, 2024 21:09
Question edited.
Oct 6, 2024 21:08
Being bold, yes ma'am. 🫡
Oct 6, 2024 20:55
> A few years ago, I set up a number of Windows 95 VMs. During the Windows installation/setup process for several of the VMs, I, in my infinite hubris, ignored the common advice against using your actual name as your username. In the intervening years, my egg cracked, and I now have several VMs deadnaming me.
>
> Normally, the solution to this sort of problem would be to change my username on those systems (as I've indeed done with a number of VMs installed with Windows NT, even versions thereof _older_ than Windows 95), but Windows 95 does not appear to have any obvious way of doing this.
Oct 6, 2024 20:55
Ye, that's probs the best option for avoiding attracting extraneous 95-specific answers to the edited question.

Proposed interim wording:
Oct 6, 2024 20:51
Honestly slipped my mind until you mentioned it! :-þ
Oct 6, 2024 20:50
@wizzwizz4 ...oh that's right, mods can do that
Oct 6, 2024 20:49
I'm kinda worried about potentially attracting more 95-specific answers to a question about an issue that turns out to be 9x-general.
Oct 6, 2024 20:40
Keydokey.
Oct 6, 2024 20:39
@wizzwizz4 Ah, OK (the reason for my uncertainty was a lack of profile-page pronoun specificity).
Oct 6, 2024 20:39
Due to the potential impact expanding the scope of the question could have on the preexisting accepted answer, I'm gonna wait for now and see if Stephen Kitt weighs in on this discussion.
Oct 6, 2024 20:37
...Stuff like this is part of why I wish we had the option to accept more than one answer. Stephen Kitt's answer is a very good answer for Windows 95 specifically, but a more general answer might be better as regards Windows 9x as a whole (unless, of course, their answer turns out to itself be generalizable to Windows 9x generally [defaulting to "their" since I don't know Stephen Kitt's preferred pronouns]).
Oct 6, 2024 20:31
@wizzwizz4 Unfortunately, it turns out the original question's focus on specifically Windows 95 was itself invalid, as the issue at question turns out to be one with Windows 9x generally.
Oct 6, 2024 20:29
> A few years ago, I set up a lot of Windows 9x VMs. During the Windows installation/setup process for several of the VMs, I, in my infinite hubris, ignored the common advice against using your actual name as your username. In the intervening years, my egg cracked, and I now have several VMs deadnaming me.
>
> Normally, the solution to this sort of problem would be to change my username on those systems (as I've indeed done with a number of VMs installed with various Windows NT versions all the way back to NT 3.1), but none of Windows 95, 98, and ME appear to have any obvious way of doing
Oct 6, 2024 20:29
New proposed wording:
Oct 6, 2024 20:21
If multi-user settings aren't enabled, is username changing going to be as simple on 98/ME as on 95?
Oct 6, 2024 20:20
This might actually be a general Win9x issue.
Oct 6, 2024 20:20
Aaaaaaaaand seems that ME's the same as both versions of 98 in that regard.
Oct 6, 2024 20:19
...OK, looks like in both FE and SE it might depend on whether multi-user settings're enabled?
Oct 6, 2024 20:16
...hmmm, looks like it might differ between 98FE and 98SE? Spinning up one of the latter as well.
Oct 6, 2024 20:14
@wizzwizz4 Spinning up a 98FE VM right now to check, bak in a minute or two.
Oct 6, 2024 20:12
Should I put that line in as well, or leave it out?
Oct 6, 2024 20:12
Actually, hang on: I just remembered the line about "Normally, the solution to this sort of problem would be to change my username on those systems (as I've indeed done with a number of VMs installed with newer Windows versions), but Windows 95 does not appear to have any obvious way of doing this." from the original question.
On the one hand, it could be considered superfluous detail; on the other, it does explain why this issue is *specifically* with Windows 95 (rather than Windows 9x in general).
Oct 6, 2024 20:09
Edited the proposed wording a bit.
Oct 6, 2024 20:08
@wizzwizz4 ...aaaaand apparently even the blockquote syntax doesn't render if there're any non-blockquoted lines in the message.
Oct 6, 2024 20:07
> A few years ago, I set up some Windows 95 VMs. During the Windows 95 installation/setup process, in my infinite hubris, I ignored the common advice against using your actual name as your username. In the intervening years, my egg cracked, with the result that I now have several VMs deadnaming me.
>
> I would like to remove my deadname from these VMs and replace it with something else, without wiping the VMs and reinstalling Windows 95. How can I accomplish this?
Oct 6, 2024 20:07
Anyway, re:wording, how's this?
Oct 6, 2024 20:03
@wizzwizz4 ...That's your "as though" I'm quoting there.
Oct 6, 2024 20:02
@wizzwizz4 Ah, noted!
Oct 6, 2024 20:02
@wizzwizz4 (Probably not for people who don't read El Goonish Shive, though.)
Oct 6, 2024 20:00
...why didn't the italics in my long 5-point comment render?
Oct 6, 2024 19:58
@wizzwizz4 Wouldn't matter in this case anyway, since the only potentially-sensitive information that was present, even in the previous long form of the answer, was the mere fact of me being trans, which I'm very open about anyway.
Oct 6, 2024 19:56
(1) "In my infinite hubris...": As noted in your latest comment, this would be improved by adding the detail that that was the username I used _when setting up Windows_ (in those VMs); for instance, something like "During the Windows 95 installation/setup process, in my infinite hubris..."

(2) "...I ignored the common advice and used my actual name as my username.": I'd prefer something like "I ignored the common advice against using your actual name as your username", so as to avoid flat-out saying that my deadname _was_ (even in the past) my actual name (as opposed to that it was what I
Oct 6, 2024 19:31
@wizzwizz4 Mostly good, although there're some things I'd like to modify about it before going live.
Oct 6, 2024 19:28
@wizzwizz4 I've personally found that explicitly stating that it's "[your] unreliable thought process" tends to work.
Oct 6, 2024 19:25
@wizzwizz4 Ah, I see - I must've misjudged your tone when you said "(Obviously everyone already knows this, right?)".
Oct 6, 2024 19:24
@wizzwizz4 What's obvious to a trans person... tends not to be so to your average cis person. Hence the extra detail, given that statistically the vast majority of Stackers're probably cis.
Oct 6, 2024 19:22
I'm not trying to write a work of fiction, though. I'm trying to write a question for a Q&A site about a real-world issue I'm facing.
Oct 6, 2024 19:20
(Apologies, I can get long-winded at times and end up redundantly stating the same thing more than once in a given statement in my efforts to make sure the point I'm trying to get across gets gotten across.)
Oct 6, 2024 19:16
@wizzwizz4 This. Honestly under most circumstances someone who doesn't particularly like their username'd be OK to just grin and bear it; this ceases to become a workable solution when the specific reason for not liking the username is that it deadnames the user (given that being deadnamed, even by an automated system, is acutely distressing in ways that simply don't come into play in the more-general doesn't-like-their-username situation).
Oct 6, 2024 19:12
Also, in general, if I'm asking a question based on a specific issue that I'm actually personally facing, I tend to prefer to go into quite a bit of detail, because lots of seemingly-simple Q&A pairs can turn out to have nuances that can render an answer to a nonspecifically-phrased question inapplicable or unworkable due to specific details of my specific situation.