chronolegends

finally, 100% bored joins the room

since thats omega+1 level

i can't beat grahams in mine as it is

nice

^that version shows the thing as it unpacks lol

repl.it/FmT7/16

i have fgh for $f_{\alpha}(\beta)$ where $ \alpha,\beta < \omega$

wow, thats quite golfed up @SimplyBeautifulArt i doubt i can get anywhere near 300

Thats really good

SVO is the limit of $\varphi(1), \varphi(1,0), \varphi(1,0,0), ...$

then finally $ψ(Ω^{Ω+1})=\Gamma_{\Gamma_{\Gamma_{\ddots}}}=\varphi(1,1,0)$

$ψ(Ω^Ω)=\varphi_{\varphi_{...}(0)}(0) = \Gamma_0$

also, if $\Omega$ iterates functions, and $\psi(\Omega^x) = \varphi_{1+x}(0)$ then

svo is not $ \varphi(1,1,0) $

nope

Happy halloween @SimplyBeautifulArt i hope you are feeling healhy today

interactive CD rom. i had encarta 95 as a kid it was the bomb

lol

Hello

sup guyse

2 crzy 4 u :p

oww

@SimplyBeautifulArt are you feeling better today?

hi there

ok

What does Ω(↑3)Ω mean ? c:

He noticed

lol

holds deedlit

notice me senpai

ie. some minor lapse of fallacy might get you to discard an otherwise intelectually sound paper

that method might throw some false negatives tho

k

nice

$\varphi_{..._{\varphi(0)}(0)}(0)$ better?

they are

lol

lol fixed

i'll throw in, $\Gamma_0 = \varphi_{..._{\varphi(0)}}$

No, thats good pacing

hahaha

he's ready

give him $\Gamma_0$ now

exciting

He's diving into it

lol

I don't take it back

I know, there isn't a problem with the way he did but, its just like a general use advice

try to avoid using minus signs when handling ordinals

hahahahaha, nice