Could someone who knows about NFA help me with this question? math.stackexchange.com/q/4924750/390226. It's about the implication of transition functions' value being an empty set. The thread has become a bit long, and I (unfortunately) suspect that the existing (only) answer hasn't resolved my confusion.
@robjohn Hi sorry for direct tagging, if you have time could you help me with a simple(?) problem I asked yesterday but I didn't get an answer: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/63837804#63837804. The context is some lines above the linked comment cus I made a typo in my formula.
but yes, when I said I want to prove that $T(i)$ is a decreasing function I do mean: $T(i)$ decreases when $i$ increases. (not saying you didn't get it, just want to put emphasis on this)
The formula is the definition of $T(i)$. The calculation is done reversely. The base case is $T(n)$, and finally it will reach $T(0)$ and that's the answer.
But from my current understanding, the formula itself depends on zero knowledge of ML. There is no hidden relation between $T(i),d_i,d_s,g_k$. Except for the function $T(i)$, all these variables can be thought of as just some positive integers from a log file.
We can assume that $d_i = g_i$ (let me omit the context), and for simplicity we can assume that $d_i$ are all small integers like $1<d_i<100$. $T(i)$ is a function for the calculation of memory usage. Thanks for your reply anyway.
my apologies that this formula might not be well-defined (I'm not the one who first wrote it) and you might have questions like "what is $d_i, g_k$" all I can say is that this is a formula from Machine Learning and $d,g$ mean data, gradient respectively. I cannot provide more details.
Sorry for hijacking the thread, but I just want to say that my disability in making decisions just helped me saving money on choosing a new laptop. I go with my old PC :)