Mathematics

Associated with Math.SE; for both general discussion & math qu...
Jan 22, 2017 01:38
That seems right I guess
Jan 22, 2017 01:36
oops
Jan 22, 2017 01:35
Doesn't it toggle the four neighbors?
Jan 22, 2017 01:35
i think
Jan 22, 2017 01:35
Well in an infinite grid you just make a parity argument
Jan 17, 2017 14:03
@DHMO Oh, ok. That being said I've always thought of the trig functions $sin^2(x)$ as the exception to the rule rather than the other way around
Jan 17, 2017 14:01
@AlessandroCodenotti Thanks, I'll remind you!
Jan 17, 2017 14:01
@DHMO If your codomain of $f$ doesn't have multiplication defined then it's going to fail, I guess
Jan 17, 2017 13:59
@AlessandroCodenotti These kind of things annoy me to no end haha
Jan 17, 2017 13:57
@AlessandroCodenotti It would be very nice if you could! Thanks
Jan 17, 2017 13:55
@AlessandroCodenotti Yeah, if that was the case it immediately follows, but with this definition of primitive I'm not sure if it works
Jan 17, 2017 13:51
@AlessandroCodenotti But there seems to be many variants of 'primitive' floating around so its a bit confusing and I wanted to clear it up as well
Jan 17, 2017 13:50
@Socrates np
Jan 17, 2017 13:50
@AlessandroCodenotti Gallian defines primitive as $F(a)\cong E$ iff $a$ primitive where $E$ is an extension of $F$ and $a$ in $E$
Jan 17, 2017 13:47
@Socrates $f(0) = 0, f(1) = 0$. Then set $A = \{0\}$ and $B = \{1\}$
Jan 17, 2017 13:45
The multiplicative group $GF(p^n)^* := GF(p^n) - {0}$ is shown to be cyclic. If we consider $GF(p^n)$ as a extension of $GF(p)$, does a primitive element $a$ in $GF(p^n)$ necessarily generate $GF(p^n)^*$?
Jan 17, 2017 13:41
If $E$ is an extension of $F$, Gallian defines a primitive element of $E$ to be $a\in E$ such that $F(a)\cong E$
Jan 17, 2017 13:39
I have a question about finite fields
Jan 17, 2017 13:39
Hello people
Jan 16, 2017 22:54
@Simple Not immediately, since $|Y-X|$ isn't linear, so you would split into cases where $Y \ge X$ and $X \gt Y$
Jan 16, 2017 22:49
@Simple So you're done right
Jan 16, 2017 22:49
@Simple i.e. The probability that 'something happens' is 1
Jan 16, 2017 22:47
@Simple Do you know that for a function to be a probability mass function then the sum of the function over all the all the possible values the random variable can attain is 1?
Jan 16, 2017 22:44
@Simple No I mean the probability $P(Y\gt 0)$
Jan 16, 2017 22:41
@Simple What is the probability that $Y$ takes on a non-negative number then?
Jan 16, 2017 22:39
@Simple Well does $Y=0$ and $Y > 0$ cover all the possible values that $Y$ can take on?
Jan 16, 2017 22:34
@Simple If $Y$ takes on only non-negative values, then what is $P(Y=0) + P(Y>0)$?
Jan 16, 2017 22:32
@Simple No, I mean that Poisson random variables are meant to be used for $Y\ge 0$ only.
Jan 16, 2017 22:29
@Simple Do you know that Poisson variables are only non-negative?
Jan 16, 2017 22:25
@Simple What's $P(Y=0) + P(Y\gt 0)$?
Jan 16, 2017 22:20
@Simple An indicator function is 0 when the condition (in this case $Y>0$) is false and 1 when the condition is true. You are right in that you are summing the Poisson, but there's an easier way to calculate it without having to do any sums
Jan 16, 2017 22:11
@Simple When is $X=1$?
Jan 16, 2017 22:11
@Simple No, that's the probability that $Y=1$, not $X=1$
Jan 16, 2017 22:09
@Simple No, your formula for $X=1$ is wrong
Jan 16, 2017 22:07
@Simple Yup, so whats $P(X=0)$ and $P(X=1)$? That's the mass function of $X$
Jan 16, 2017 22:06
@Simple Er I don't think the probability is 0 at $Y=0$
Jan 16, 2017 22:01
Well then it's 0 when Y is 0, and 1 otherwise, so what are the corresponding probabilities?
Jan 16, 2017 21:59
@Simple $I_{[Y\gt 0]}$ is an indicator variable?
Jan 16, 2017 21:22
@Vrouvrou What are $C_E$ and $C_F$ and the other variables
Jan 16, 2017 21:19
What are the variables supposed to be
Jan 16, 2017 21:17
but its a distinction i guess
Jan 16, 2017 21:17
just being pedantic >_>
Jan 16, 2017 21:17
yeah, but the typed out proof says that 'every neighbourhood is of the form (open interval)'
Jan 16, 2017 21:15
well technically an open set in the standard topology is not an open interval either, but a union of open intervals? I think
Jan 16, 2017 20:53
that seems like a strange way to ask questions
Jan 16, 2017 20:44
Its not like I do this on a regular basis haha
Jan 16, 2017 20:44
I was sleeping too late so I decided to fix it
Jan 16, 2017 20:43
@ForeverMozart No, I was too lazy to get up haha
Jan 16, 2017 20:42
I slept 16 hours yesterday to fix my sleep schedule, feels good
Jan 16, 2017 20:09
@Astyx and @SimpleArt I guess.. haha