skeggse

Even more simply: get good at doing things that could be useful in a number of contexts. You'll create a broad knowledge base to draw from, and be able to reapply existing skills in new ways/contexts.

Mostly my recommendation is that you become familiar with many different aspects of CS such that you can pick up something new if necessary. Example: get used to a number of documentation tools, so that if a company you join is using one, you have a relatively shallow learning curve, and already know what purpose such a tool would serve. Same thing goes for other tools like compilers, issue trackers, etc

Yeah, no problem

Generally, I have enough broad knowledge about how things work in CS that I can relatively quickly pick up a new skill when my work requires it

Hopefully that helps

You generally pick these up through a CS education, but as always that depends on how much effort you put into it

There are probably more, but those are the skills that come to mind

This ability stems from higher-level skills, including debugging, communicating, documentation, and research.

I can only speak from the perspective of someone who has successfully entered the software development as a self-taught developer; I just finished my first year as an undergraduate, but I held a number of software development positions before electing to go to college. My education prior to working was varied, and the skills I now market center around my ability to quickly pick up a new tool/language/framework.

In computer science, a marketable skill isn't necessarily mastery/knowledge of a specific language, but rather higher-level skills you can apply and reuse in many contexts.

@StanShunpike "Does a cs course have to be in a marketable language to be of use?" In short, no. You can learn something marketable from any cs course, though you can also learn nothing from any cs course. The marketable skill won't necessarily be directly from the language, but might instead be debugging skills, a better understanding of machine organization, or other so-called marketable skills.

Have a better morpheme?

@StoneyB I got that vibe from an alternate definition

I don't really care if such a word exists, I was just wondering if anyone here knew of such a word

@StoneyB also chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/21053126#21053126

Welp

@StoneyB I gave an example usage above

It's an owl O.O

Was hoping there was a /me

aww

/help

"Nature can also be ascribed value in religious frameworks: a monotheistic god creates the world, and either effectively declares it a work of art, or implies that humankind should assume the role of ruler. Casually, this remains an anthropocentric view, but it does so in the context of a higher power, thus making it monotheistic-god-centric view."

not necessarily the only definition

Not sure that's what I'm going for

monotheocentrism — the assumption that worship of the one God is the only legitimate form of religion

How a view could be considered anthropocentric, but instead of pertaining to humans, pertaining to a singular god

I'm looking for a word that could be described as "of or pertaining to a monotheistic god'

haha

It's not pretty but it's the most accurate thing I could come up with

@JimReynolds That's what I have written right now

@JimReynolds I guess I'm not entirely sure what the difference is

@DamkerngT. that seems like an option

@MARamezani Hi :D

I'm not sure if there is...

I found ecclesiastical, but that's more pertaining to church structures and the human aspect of monotheistic religions.

Is there a word for monotheistic-god-centric (similar to anthropocentric for humans)?

Alright, figured it out. And that was the problem...I'll have to figure out how to unblock it.

I'm trying to figure out how to temporarily disable the firewall on Avast

@Paul Sorry, I'm multitasking a bunch

but I don't know how to use it

looks like it

hmmm

I've run the test enough times in Wireshark to know that I'm not making a typo in the filter

But if I try telnet google.com 80, nothing shows up in Wireshark

I can see the TCP packet

If I try to telnet to, say, my host

to see what packets actually get out of the guest

I tried running Wireshark

The guest's mac address differs from all other networked devices I can see

if so, then yes, they are identical.