Mathematics

Associated with Math.SE; for both general discussion & math qu...
Nov 8, 2016 22:29
Thank's man wouldn't have expected a soo fast answer ;)
Nov 8, 2016 22:29
Yes makes perfectly sense ;)
Nov 8, 2016 22:26
Yes but the question wants me to show it thats the problem
Nov 8, 2016 22:25
oeww precisely ;)
Nov 8, 2016 22:23
Guy i got a question I need to show that K[X] is K-Vektorroom. I know the definition of a polynom and a vektorroom, but my question is can i just choose 3 random polynoms from my vektorroom to show for example associativity under addition?
Oct 19, 2016 18:12
nope ... I had only a brief introduction to groups rings and morphisms ... and this is part of my linear algebra course
Oct 19, 2016 18:10
hmm i think that's precisely what i do not understand .. I mean I only understand what a ring / group is... and the different types of morphism...
Oct 19, 2016 18:04
@Alessandro I mean i just do not fully understand how i mean how would i do this for the first example a)
Oct 19, 2016 17:56
I mean i do not grasp what i have to show
Oct 19, 2016 17:55
Well this is the question i have . I dont really fully understand the answer and need to see how to do thus
Oct 19, 2016 17:47
Hey guys you have time to help me a bit out in linear algebra?
Oct 12, 2016 20:07
anyone here able to proof this math.stackexchange.com/questions/1965764/…
Sep 28, 2016 21:39
This is harder then i thought
Sep 28, 2016 21:39
hmm ... damn
Sep 28, 2016 21:36
@Semiclassical Isn't just the same as 1) Just the difference that 2) are the subset that include Z with a smallest Element
Sep 28, 2016 21:33
This
Sep 28, 2016 21:33
Well 1) is just all sets T which are subsets of N so that they have a smallest Element
and 2) is the same but with all subsets with Z included
Sep 28, 2016 21:32
*what
Sep 28, 2016 21:32
@Danu yep thats why i meant to say before
Sep 28, 2016 21:31
@TedShifrin well how could i logically proof it as the same if A=N doesnt count to the statement
Sep 28, 2016 21:30
@TedShifrin Well i could understand this in number theory but not here
Sep 28, 2016 21:28
Damn i have no clue why this is included in my linear algebra class
Sep 28, 2016 21:27
xD
Sep 28, 2016 21:27
Hmmm now im getting confused
Sep 28, 2016 21:24
So we could argue they are equivalent
Sep 28, 2016 21:23
and 2) is the same but with all subsets with Z included
Sep 28, 2016 21:23
Well 1) is just all sets T which are subsets of N so that they have a smallest Element
Sep 28, 2016 21:21
@TedShifrin well me neither ;) well i think i got part 1) done I'm just struggeling with the second part of the question the most proof that [3] implies [2]
Sep 28, 2016 21:19
@TedShifrin Well thats the problem the prof gave us the exercice like this
Sep 28, 2016 21:17
@TedShifrin hmmm okj
Sep 28, 2016 21:15
@SimpleArt Sorry i'm new here need to get first used to it :(
Sep 28, 2016 21:13
Hey guys if anyones good with elementary-number-theory I would be very happy if u could help with this one math.stackexchange.com/questions/1943982/…
Sep 27, 2016 19:06
Well a) wants the logical proof that (1*) = (2*) Question b) Here is the question to show that (3*) implies (2*) and c) is about proofing the formulae (3*) by induction
Sep 27, 2016 19:02
a,b,c are just subquestions ;)
Sep 27, 2016 19:01
ahhh ;) a,b,c are the questions and 1*, 2* , 3* thingies are just to see what we have to do with it
Sep 27, 2016 18:56
I just seem too not get it
Sep 27, 2016 18:55
0
Q: Logic and the ZFC - set theorem Problem with Induction

Ajax EdmI really need some help with my assignment. Im terrible at Logic and the ZFC - set theorem I hope you can help check my work so far and help me solve this hard one All the best Ajax In this exercice we need to prove that: (1*)Is T a not empty subset of the natural numbers N, that means their ex...

Sep 27, 2016 18:55
Guys I really need ur help with this one ...
Sep 27, 2016 16:19
?
Sep 27, 2016 16:19
Anyone really good with ZFC-set theory
Sep 27, 2016 16:03
Sep 27, 2016 13:27
If anyone is good at Logic and Set theorem I would love to see some attempts... It's to abstract for meLogic and the ZFC - set theorem Problem
Sep 27, 2016 13:23
could really need some help with that question
Sep 27, 2016 13:22
Damn :(
Sep 27, 2016 13:21
@MAFIA36790 How can i do that xD
Sep 27, 2016 13:19
Anybody really good with ZFC-set theorem and logic ?
 

 Set theory

Anything related to set theory. For instructions how to render...
Sep 27, 2016 13:36
0
Q: Logic and the ZFC - set theorem Problem

Ajax EdmI really need some help with my assignment. Im terrible at Logic and the ZFC - set theorem I hope you can help check my work so far and help me solve this hard one All the best Ajax In this exercice we need to prove that: (1*)Is T a not empty subset of the natural numbers N, that means their...