SAJW

Add the General case

Maybe this ist more philosophical, but can IT be that a certain Insight ist better understood from a 1d creature thank from a 2d, outside of what IT feels to be in the former

Sorry for Bad capitalization

Mmh i think of gödels incompleteness vs consistency Like the halting Problem, because the solution i ready where very similar. But ist the Numbers of "different" unprovable Statements Infinite? Like different thoughtbranches of a Axiom based system. That there are infinitely many of the Same branch i understand by now.

Why does the Principe of induction Not Work in gödels incompleteness, Like OK there ist a Statement that ist true but Not provable by some theory, then add that and all next Statements too that occur by the Same logic

Hi can x!-y! Be expressed differently (Not Just writing ist Out)

Also have a A1 day

Can a Infinite Powertower equal a negative Numbers? I assume yes with a complex x, but I can Not find anything on the topic.

and probability per try times tries is simply the expected value or?

probabilities like 1/1,000,000 per try

How big can the error be: Instead of using the binomial coefficient to calc probability of something happening over x tries, simply multiply by tries. Of course with reason, as it is obvious that the chance that I throw heads in 2 tries is not 100% ;)

Ok, I figured my real problem out. I don't understand the probabilistic method.

Didn't even know you can proof something with probability. Lucky day

...Still sceptical, but I guess it's right haha

But that's what youtube decided to throw in my suggestions :D

Probably!

just watched it and I don't understand the proof at all

yes, you can use fewer

Where am I wrong?

then just place the rest of the points somewhere, such that the down point is the middle of a slightly bigger circle

if the red line is the radius of the unit circle

ibb.co/WkNsLLm the 3 upper points can't all be covered by nonoverlapping circles

Why does the 45 configuration-technique not apply to ten?

I don't understand why 10 points can always be covered by 10 non-overlapping unit-circles

An item in diablo 2 has usually a fingerprint which is 4 bytes big. So that would be 2^32 possibilities if I'm right. What is the formula to calculate the neccessary items to have a P% chance to have 2 or more items with the same fingerprint? This is just the birthday paradoxon with different numbers or?

Does it make sense? "The odds are low (or high)"? and what does it mean?

I tend to think it's one of 0.25 or 0.5

OK another try: $P(A∧\neg B)=0.5$ , $P(B∧\neg A)=0.25$ and $P(A∧B)=0.25$. Can I deduct the chance for A when B is given?

latex too hard haha

Ok, lets say suffix is event A, prefix B. Then $P(A\nand B)=0.5$ , $P(B \nand A)=0.25$ and $P(A\and B)=0.25%$. So now the questions is, if B is given, what's the chance of A. Can that be deducted from those chances?

"Magical items have a 50% chance of a suffix only, 25% chance of a prefix only, and 25% chance of both." How to determine from these facts the chance that a Item with a prefix also has a suffix? is it 25% or 50%?

How is the problem called? You want to cross a river with a boat, but it has a current. So you have to travel at a specific angle to cross it the fastest way possible.

i think that's called amplitude

the waves height is also arbitrary

has a wave with an arbitrary small frequency a finite length? that would be in a sense fractal and smooth at the same time

can a surface be fractal and smooth at the same time?

@leslietownes Ah ok. I don't have something in mind, just find the surface area of a ball/sphere interesting. I'll check it out.

What is a good book about the surface area of smooth things?

Is there a mathematical proof that is not verifiable by any human?

@shintuku what was the solution to your $y-y^3$ with [-1,1]?

oops, $1-3y^2$ should be it

to look for a extremum

@shintuku is that what deriviative is for? y-y^3-> 1-2y^2?

Why not make $z=(1-y^2)^2y$?

@shintuku I can only think of arguing vague, that x must be larger than y, because it where small the product would be even smaller

So it's impossible? Is every paradox impossible?

Ah that set must include itself, but then it is a member of itself.

What is a simple logic paradox?

Ah it can save time when the evaluation of one variable is expensive I see.