Mar 14, 2017 12:30
@can-ned_food The idea of being subpoena'd for a drug screen is ridiculous. Very simply, the company can (even retroactively) make complying with the test a condition of employment, and this isn't a court, so taking the 5th is really nothing more than retracting your application.
 

 The h Bar

General chat for Physics SE (physics.stackexchange.com). For M...
Mar 7, 2017 20:27
makes it very clear
Mar 7, 2017 20:27
I really like the figure you made that shows the geometric relation between those two Gaussian point-clouds on the IQ plane
Mar 7, 2017 20:24
@DanielSank Convolutions and kernels are something I have been trying to learn about recently for neural network applications.
Mar 7, 2017 20:23
I don't really have the background to understand your answer, but the question is very interesting.
Mar 7, 2017 20:23
@DanielSank WOW !
Mar 7, 2017 20:19
Yeah, I really like the whole "as he distance to home approaches infinity" deal.
Mar 7, 2017 20:18
Nice.
Mar 7, 2017 20:18
i'm a fan of R but i think there are better for stochastics, neh?
Mar 7, 2017 20:18
@DanielSank yeah. what do you like to use for modeling?
Mar 7, 2017 20:17
Random walk stochastics, sick.
Mar 7, 2017 20:17
VERY cool solution, @DanielSank.
Mar 7, 2017 20:16
He says "show how X" and almost nothing inbetween.
Mar 7, 2017 20:15
That's really my interest in jackson.
Mar 7, 2017 20:15
Yeah!!
Mar 7, 2017 20:15
It changed me!
Mar 7, 2017 20:15
While, many of the actual math majors were like "uggghh".
Mar 7, 2017 20:15
Yeah. I took real analysis as an elective and loved it.
Mar 7, 2017 20:15
yeah!
Mar 7, 2017 20:14
@BenNiehoff, I am a glutton for punishment.
Mar 7, 2017 20:14
@DanielSank Noted. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place.
Mar 7, 2017 20:13
I'm not a physicist, but I love challenging texts.
Mar 7, 2017 20:13
From many people, I have got the sentiment "after Jackson, my vector calc and problem solving muscles are so strong, I can crunch anything"
Mar 7, 2017 20:13
@BenNiehoff, That's primarily why I'm interested in it.
Mar 7, 2017 20:12
Maybe I should reconsider my priorities.
Mar 7, 2017 20:12
Hmmm..
Mar 7, 2017 20:12
Really?
Mar 7, 2017 20:12
Enthused!
Mar 7, 2017 20:12
hahaha
Mar 7, 2017 20:11
People come out the other end of the 2nd grad class on Jackson a different person.
Mar 7, 2017 20:11
It's like Goku training with a stone on his back.
Mar 7, 2017 20:11
I have heard that from my physics grad student friends and professors, but I have also heard that there is a great reward from pushing through it.
Mar 7, 2017 20:10
Whereas Jackson just says "ok show how this vector field"
Mar 7, 2017 20:10
Ch.1 in Zangwill, Mathematical Preliminaries, really helped me brush up on my multivariate vector calculus / fields
Mar 7, 2017 20:09
I'm actually using Zangwill to help me understand Jackson. I'm glad you suggested it, maybe i'm on the right path.
Mar 7, 2017 20:09
OH!
Mar 7, 2017 20:09
I mean, I want Jackson for the challenge, but if there's a more modern text which doesn't rake you against the coals maybe I could get some understanding from it and take another look at Jackson.
Mar 7, 2017 20:08
Don't tease me.
Mar 7, 2017 20:08
!!!
Mar 7, 2017 20:07
Anyway, if anybody has any favorite texts or suggestions for how to get a better grasp on approaching Jackson, hit me.
Mar 7, 2017 20:07
Watchmen is maybe one of the most "literary" works in the graphic novel medium.
Mar 7, 2017 20:07
haha
Mar 7, 2017 20:06
The graphic novel is tops, too.
Mar 7, 2017 20:06
Brilliant.
Mar 7, 2017 20:06
Yeah.
Mar 7, 2017 20:04
Is that why following his notation is so confusing?
Mar 7, 2017 20:04
I'm glad you said it
Mar 7, 2017 20:04
PHEW
Mar 7, 2017 20:03
It seems that largely, we're talking vector calc of real fields, and PDEs in cartesian/ellipisoidal/polar/spherical/cylindrical blah blah blah
Mar 7, 2017 20:03
I'm working through Griffith.