Marek

Is that the same ? It made us a lot of money. It caused us to earn a lot of money.

"It made us a lot of money." If this clause includes meaning "earn" and "enable"

The fact that we sold our car last year makes us enable to earn a lot of money. The fact that we sold our car last year makes it possible for us to earn a lot of money.

You are right "can" is bad , I meant "enable"

"be able to" is ok.

if "can" is synonymous for "possible" in that context ?

Thanks

Do they mean the same ? His behaviour towards employees makes us have to change our job. His behaviour towards employees makes it necessary to change our job.

But , it is English textbook SPECTRUM

By Dr. Elaine Ramsey

Some research shows

Is the clause correct ? Taking aspirin might make that your cold will last longer.

It was something as : I clicked

I mean fingers click

How to describe the situation when I just understood something. Such a slang .....

Which clause is correct ? We had to make clear same complex matters. we had to make some complex matters clear.

Which sentence is correct? I have done it for your happiness. I have done it for your being happy.

vs. I stopped for pedestrians.

I didn't buy a new car for money.

Thanks

but what about that one : I didn't buy a new car for failing to have any money. or I didn't buy a new car to have no money.

What works better here : I didn't have money. or I failed to have money.

I mean : He didn't win until his second try.

Do the sentences mean the same and are they correct ? His winning was not until for a second time. He won only for a second time.

Thanks

yes

I looked for him in the room ? I looked the room for him ?

Are there clauses correct?

Thank you.

What kind of clause would be best ?

Is it correct to say : Do you like a butter to eat ? or Do you like to eat a butter ?

Can I change position of object in sentence ?