FlashCactus

As is the whole topic, though, and I really hope for a revival.

FYI, we also have a separate "tag" chat where we could have lengthy discussions without writing hundreds of comments under each post in Meta, though it's somewhat unpopular right now.

Tags are indeed one of the things we should get (at least reasonably close to) right as early as possible, so I'd love to see everyone's active participation in the discussion of this topic.

welll, congrats everyone

okay, the feed is seriously messed up now.

//I almost wish there were something else to burninate :)

Yeah, it was great!

Bye!

great!

(while it is about an under250 drone, the answer doesn't change either way)

@Daniil I'd untag this one if I were you: drones.stackexchange.com/questions/112/…

No. Why?

so there's no reason to rename the tag, just remove it from questions that aren't really affected by the size of the drone

even though they are the minority

Not all questions about sub250 are about regulations

erm, no

context for the rest of the chat: drones.meta.stackexchange.com/a/97/272

Although I agree with @Catija's point somewhat, I still think the tag itself is needed, although maybe we need to make a second pass over the questions that have it and remove it from those whose answers aren't affected by the drone being under 250g, i.e. probably most non-legislation questions

ah, okay

(the other is that as you go on, there's more questions that need your attention and more people who got used to something you now don't want)

and that's one of the main reasons to do all the tag related stuff early on

it stirs up all of the sediment from the bottom of the feed and confuses people who don't know what the heck is happening

@CaptainJ.LPicard yeah, that's the main problem with mass-editing tags after private beta

yay

apparently we're done

ok, great

(or rather the long version, ready-to-fly)

I'd go with RTF

the main distinction is whether it's meant to be customizable/rebuildable, or sold as a proprietary, non-modifiable package

actually, RTF seems like a good option. almost all of the commercial sealed drones are RTF

unfortunately, "prebuilt" includes drones that are DIY-type but built by someone else

non-diy?

I think such a tag would be very useful, but I'm stuck with the naming.

Should we have a tag about drones that are commercially built/storebought/prebuilt/you get it?

Okay, one thing I should discuss.

erm, I'm just using the "edit tags" function, it doesn't have the option to put in descriptions AFAIK

I'd say get rid of the tag on this one entirely (and add more relevant tags probably)

I'm going to start with mine as well.

Ok, sure

ok, let's begin. I'd drop in on the fun as well.

Rename it to sub-250g maybe?

Did you create the sub-250 tag already?

Aaaand I'm still hoping @Catija or someone else would clarify whether SE has some kind of "restrict tag" functionality so that the tags we just removed couldn't be recreated in the future by some random user.

what's your take on it?

I'm not quite sure about how to name it

wait wait

Otherwise, sure.

The only thing I'd change is make the sub250 tag first so that it could be used in the retagging.

We need to get rid of both, retag the existing questions, and probably add a dedicated sub250 tag.