waldyrious

@quassy I don't think you should make your answer only about removing old kernels, since the question was more generic, and also because there already is a question for that, with good answers (sorry, on mobile, but you can find the link in my profile since I wrote one of the answers to it)

The author of the bogus question should probably be blocked, there's no way such an action was made by mistake. May be an attempt to gain reputation by reposting existing questions, in order to be able to post clickable links.

Not sure I made myself clear enough. Only the first link was problematic, the other two questions had nothing to do with it except for the fact that they were copied.all three had a different author.

nevermind, found the "flag" link (I may have been searching for "report", or maybe there's a time-out since I had reported a spam answer just a few minutes before)

correction: almost verbatim, with slight changes

I'm thinking the user is a spammer, but I can't see a report option for neither the question nor the user. Please take the appropriate actions.

@LewisGoddard, @embik, @RolandiXor: this question appears to use the title of this one and the body of this other one, both verbatim.

But looking again at the questions, the instructions for Freya already say that gtk-widgets.css is the file to edit, but that's for gtk3 apps. Can you take another look and confirm what's missing / wrong?

Hahah I suppose so. Still, the answers can be edited for a reason :) it's best if they're correct now, and either be updated or have a deprecation note added when things change.

Hm, reading that again, only step 3 is incorrect for Freya, since one needs to edit gtk.css rather than gtkrc, right? If so, what needs to be changed in gtk.css?

As for the correctness of the instructions for Freya, thanks for the clarification. I understand if you prefer not encouraging people to tweak the system like that, but the answer is misleading as it stands. What do you suggest?

@DanielForé hahaha fair enough. Don't forget to delete your comment on @mazienho's answer, though, since it doesn't apply anymore

and while we're at it, @mazienho, perhaps you could remove this comment as well, since the answer now includes both Luna and Freya instructions.

Also, you might want to delete your answer (although I'm afraid that it will be just hidden from public view, but remain visible to you and moderators), since it's been integrated into @mazienho's

Btw is the answer as I edited it correct? Especially for Freya, since I only tested in Luna

I'll delete mine then

@DanielForé yep, my point exactly.

@PNG that was the fastest acceptance of an edit suggestion I've had in any SE network site :)

@Tim I am not sure I understand your question. Happy to chat about that at a time we both are online

@DanielForé let me know when I can find you around so we can sort out the scrollbar question.

You mean disagreed with the post, or disagreed with the removal? And are you talking about comments too, or just answers? I just woke up so sorry if I'm a little slow :P

I would suggest you to restore the post, even to make it clear to others that it's ok that nominations aren't unanimously accepted -- in fact, that's pretty much guaranteed when there are more candidates than available positions.

In fact, that removal demonstrates precisely one of the traits that led me to comment there: you unilaterally decided to remove a post based on an assessment that it wasn't useful to the community, when in fact I (and I believe others would agree) think the opposite.

@Tim I totally understand your reasoning, but that's no reason to remove the post. Community support is decided in the votes, and seeing what the community doesn't support is just as useful as seeing what it does support. I understand that for you it's a personal matter, kind of having a public demonstration of a negative assessment of your fitness for moderation, but I think the discussion there was honest, civil and generic enough not to read as a personal attack.

I think the discussion in the comments was pretty relevant for us to define what we want or not from moderators, and IMO it would be a net positive for them to remain public.

@Tim, did you delete your nomination in the moderator discussion on meta?

Agreed @elmato

@Tim, I've deleted the other comments, the only one remaining is this one: elementaryos.stackexchange.com/questions/35/…

do you think we should delete the comments in the answers prior to this discussion, to remove pollution?

I think it's fine now :D

gotta go now, ttyl

ok. Maybe I'll try installing it one of these days and I might have some extra details to add to the answer :)

the problem with the program

I'm still confused xD

okay, so... what was the problem?

or maybe it could be rephrased to mention the problems, and to say that the "active window" screenshot mode + "with borders" setting (hope I got that right) is the closest to what you are asking for, i.e. a screenshot without the background

if that is indeed the case, the answer shouldn't be accepted, since it's precisely what you asked for

that doesn't play well with elementaryos' window manager (gala)

2) the with/without borders is meant to include or exclude border decorations, i.e. title, scrollbars, borders, etc. and take a screenshot of the window contents only

(or combination of options)

1) the tool isn't working well in elementaryos, perhaps for that specific option

here's my guess

I have no idea what's going on

That doesn't make sense :/ the window seems cropped (e.g. the title doesn't show up), and part of the background appears. Am I missing something?

no problem :)

Was the first image also taken with the active window shortcut?

@Tim let's chat here, it's better

I don't understand why the background appears in the first image and not in the second, unless you chose different areas to capture. Are you taking both screenshots using the same shortcut?

Does it actually have a "with/without borders" setting, or is that a window screenshot vs. custom area screenshot? From the images it seems you're doing the latter.

@Tim thanks for editing the question and greatly improving it. I organized it some more, but the final part, with the images, is a little confusing to me, since both images show the shadow, but you wrote "it can (...) exclude the window borders, which means you won't get the shadow"