user769707

Im not doing any studying so much right now but i have a few projects i’m working on, gmt obviously involved in and around the dg

I know who he is but idk him

it’s a good book

maggis book was actually open on my desk before i wandered in here so this discussion is appropriate

yeah

and that’s good because measure convergence is analytically good to talk about

and you can think about rectifiable things as giving you measures (just the hausdorff measure restricted to it) and the push forward of that measure by the blow up maps is gonna converge in the measure theoretic sense to the measure of the plane

the point is just that if you take something rectifiable than a.e. if you blow it up you get a plane

we have italians in our department too

(note this is a lie)

every one Ive ever met in real life is tbh

i thought all italians knew this when they were born

@AlessandroCodenotti this is fine and good

that’s true but i also read more now than i used to

about GH!

smh

@BalarkaSen i open chat to see this shit

@TedShifrin see i did read some!

errors

there are

ch 3

griffithss and harris

you have to do Currents tho

you can do it for the whole differential complex on an n-dim complex manifold

i said up at the top it's all about PDE

nice

how is life for you

zooming with people to do math just isn’t a good replacement

I have a lot of reading projects right now to make up for not being around people doing math all the time and it’s a decent flow but not getting to go to my department really sucks

if I can’t do it in person in fall i’ll suck it up and just do it on zoom

I postponed till fall because I wanted to wait and see if I could do it in person

so @TedShifrin can be happy once and for all

read griffiths and harris with me

not even once

complex analysis

(all hyperbolic though sorry)

if there were none the sky would be full of pde

@Thorgott that's cause of light polution

fuck my copy is buried in a box somewhere

isnt there a cute little paragraph in griffiths and harris about this

1st order elliptic pde are a spook buddy

what i saaid

log r

by line of course i mean circle

bladiblah

integrating 1/z on a line is coming straight from integrating a dirac mass at 0 over the disk

so distributional magic

@BalarkaSen i wonder if there is a PDE kind of pov here, 1/z looks like r/|r|^2 (this is not exactly right ik dont at me) which is the gradient of log|r| which is the fundamental solution to the laplacian

it still pings me

no he doesnt