ffahim

You will find two answers don't match. A little difference of sqrt of a

@Axoren combining 1 and 6 you will find what is wrong with the answer

Pls do write one for me. and then give a picture

no that was not the problem.

Pls write the actual answer. I really need this @Axoren

Are the terms inside ln correct? @Axoren

Actually googled it but there were two pages where they had a slight dissimilarity in the answers.

Hey what's the integral of sqrt (ax^2 +bx+c) write the ln format answer

In how many possible ways we can Rearrange the word "" MATHEMATICS """" such that all the vowels stay separately?

What is the integral of sqrt(ax^2 +bx+c) ? (give the answer in ln format

:)

OK thanks a lot

The black lines refer that those energies have been absorbed? Or emitted?

When energy is being transmitted will I see rainbow or a specific color (where only one orbit change is found)

Yeh

I see thanks a lot. Another little help. What quantization has to do with spectrum having black lines

I know they assumed n=1, but is that even correct to assume. Does that support in practical cases

They didn't bring the concept of Quantization. Rather they just simply used E=hv

If that's the case why in our textbook just divided the energy 100kj by plank's constant to get the value of the frequency. Is that theoretically correct?

But to get the energy of that photon I need to know it's frequency?

Ok I think I got it, I should always keep in mind that the 100kj energy will be absorbed be n numbers of photon?? @pentavalentcarbon

E=100KJ

E=nhv

@pentavalentcarbon

OK do you mean to say even though we know the energy difference between two levels is 100kj we don't know the energy of the photon in this case

Different Energy levels have different energies. So there are energy differences required to go from one energy level to another. Right?

The energy absorbtion or emission will always be an integer multiple of a quantized energy according to Plancks quantum theory

What is quantized energy actually?

@pentavalentcarbon just tell me Pls whether quantization is related to Bohr's model or not. If so how Pls elaborate

So to jump to the 4th shell from 3rd the required energy is 100kj , if this 100kj is absorbed by quantization. By n multiple a photon E=hv whose n multiple =nhv=100kj, how do we get the energy of photon here @pentavalentcarbon

Energy of n=4 is 300 kj

OK listen. Let's say the energy of n=3 is 200kj,

@pentavalentcarbon fine. As 100kj will be absorbed in a quantized way. Then it has to be n multiple of 1 quanta or photon. What would be the energy of this photon. Of whose n times =100kj

According to quantization it's said that emitted or absorbed energy is quantized. So when it's said in bohr's model an electron changes its orbit. Let's say the energy difference is 100kj, now, according to quantization is the 100kj itself a quantum. Or the 100kj will be absorbed in quantized way?

Hey everyone

Why doesn't electron emit energy in Bohr's Orbit (stationary orbit) ? As Rutherford's model can't describe why electrons don't fall into nucleus but in bohr's model bohr suggested that electrons stay in some specified stationary orbit where they don't lose energy. But why don't they lose energy there

Hello

Thank you so much, now it's clear :) @Semiclassical

I got that r represents here the radial distance fine, and when finding out two equal radial distance and showing that the change in distance is zero hence the radial velocity (speed) is zero, but what sign flip has to do anything with that

So how does it change sign? Since it's not a vector

Radial means vertical component?

@Semiclassical "" radial velocity goes to zero and changes sign""?

Oh I see. I am sending another picture, what does that mean by the line I circled

@Semiclassical what zero velocity has to do with the maximum radial distance since the radial velocity never becomes zero only the vertical component of velocity is zero at maximum point still there is no zero velocity. Can you please elaborate more

Hey guys while reading an article about the unusual characteristic of Projectile motion I came to know that for angle greater than 70.5288 ° the projectile starts oscillating. And we can find two points where the radial vectors magnitude is same. When I was reading the proof of this phenomenon I saw they used radial velocity =dr/dt= 0 then kept proceeding. But how could the radial velocity be zero? See the pictures