Nicholas Roberts

 Mathematics

Associated with Math.SE; for both general discussion & math qu...
Aug 11, 2021 17:41
pretty much the same as what i wrote
Aug 11, 2021 17:41
oh yeah, much easier lol
Aug 11, 2021 17:36
@Koro Suppose $f(y) = 0$ and take any $x < y$. Then $0 < \frac{f(x)-f(y)}{x-y} = \frac{f(x)}{x-y}$. Since the denominator is negative, and the quotient is positive, the numerator must also be negative, that is, $f(x) < 0$ which is a contradiction to the first part of the proof. Does this work?
Aug 11, 2021 17:27
yup, just making sure
Aug 11, 2021 17:26
just to make sure, you took epsilon to be $-f(y)$ in the assumption of the limit being 0 at negative infinity, right?
Aug 11, 2021 17:26
@Koro thanks, i filled in the details of what you wrote. will work on $f(y)=0$ now
Aug 11, 2021 17:25
@ko
Aug 11, 2021 17:08
statement*
Aug 11, 2021 17:08
Do you mean to fill in the missing details? Because that seems like it proves the statemewnt
Aug 11, 2021 17:08
@Koro
Aug 11, 2021 16:11
i have a basic question, can someone give me a hint or a step in the right direction? Suppose I have a strictly increasing function with $\lim_{x \to -\infty}f(x) = 0$. Can we deduce that $f(x) > 0$? Seems like it should be true
Dec 27, 2020 18:28
Yeah, that'll do it. thanks
Dec 27, 2020 18:26
so how come the statement isnt usually presented with this relaxed condition?
Dec 27, 2020 18:22
Hi all, in the statement of the dominated convergence we need a dominating function $g$ such that $|f_n| \leq g$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$. Can this condition be relaxed to there exists an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|f_n| \leq g$ for all $n \geq N$? It seems like that should work.
Nov 17, 2020 04:13
Yeah, maybe by messing with the sum/difference identites. Anyways, thanks!
Nov 17, 2020 04:12
I was wondering if there was a way to explicitly solve for these values. Or find like a closed form of them as opposed to proving existence of such
Nov 17, 2020 04:11
Ahh, intermediate value theorem.
Nov 17, 2020 04:10
Hm, well $\cos(a+b)=\cos(a)\cos(b)-\sin(a)\sin(b)$
Nov 17, 2020 04:09
I'm trying. Can't seem to find any
Nov 17, 2020 04:05
Would it be possible to find some values $\theta$ and $\phi$ such that $\cos(\theta + \phi) = \cos(\theta)+\cos(\phi)$? In other words, do there exist values in which any of the trig functions are additive?
Aug 13, 2020 22:55
very cool. thanks guys
Aug 13, 2020 22:39
@Thorgott
Aug 13, 2020 22:39
Thanks, have you read it? is it any good?
Aug 13, 2020 22:36
@Thorgott springer.com/gp/book/9780817646769 is this the book you speak of?
Aug 13, 2020 19:35
linear functionals on compactly supported differential m-forms
Aug 13, 2020 19:34
does anyone know a good resource for learning about currents?
May 9, 2020 22:51
Hi all, can anyone care to point me in the right direction regarding proving this trig identity? $\dfrac{1 + \cos(x/2) - \sin(x/2)}{1 - \cos(x/2) - \sin(x/2)} = -\cot(x/4)$
Jan 6, 2020 05:30
1
Q: $f \in L^+$ with $\int f = k < \infty$ then $\{x : f(x) = \infty\}$ has measure zero proof verification

Nicholas RobertsI have come up with a proof that if $f \in L^+$ with $\int f = k < \infty$ then $\{x : f(x) = \infty\}$ has measure zero. However, all of the proofs I have seen use contradiction but I did not. So I would appreciate if someone could verify/critique my attempt. As usual, $L^+$ is the set of measur...

Jan 6, 2020 05:30
hi can someone verify/critique my proof
Oct 8, 2019 19:15
@Semiclassical hmmmm ok
Oct 8, 2019 18:58
@LeakyNun regarding a PID
Oct 8, 2019 18:57
@LeakyNun Can you scroll up and look at my message?
Oct 8, 2019 18:00
Suppose I have a subring R of $\mathbb{C}[x]$ with the property that $f(1) = f(-1)$ for all $f \in R$. Can anyone show me or give me a hint to show that R is not principal ideal domain?
Sep 5, 2019 16:21
reffering to*?
Sep 5, 2019 16:21
When you say Big Rudin, what book are we referring?
Sep 5, 2019 16:20
ok thanks!
Sep 5, 2019 16:19
@TedShifrin random question, but do you know any good Functional Analysis books? My only background in the subject is Chapter 5 in Folland (which is very brief) and I'm interested in going deeper in it.
Sep 5, 2019 16:17
very nice @RScrlli ! Depending on your background in analysis, Stein may be good for you to look at.
Sep 5, 2019 16:17
@RScrlli The second book I mentioned, Stein and Shakarchi, is more forgiving than Folland. I see it as a nice bridge between Undergrad and Graduate analysis. Folland is definitely a graduate text.
Sep 5, 2019 16:16
Oh!
Sep 5, 2019 16:15
@TedShifrin True. I'm not aware of @RScrlli 's background
Sep 5, 2019 16:14
@RScrlli May I suggest Folland's Real Analysis for a nice exposition on Measure Theory as well as Stein and Shakarchi's Book 3 Real Analysis. Both have served me very well
Sep 5, 2019 03:34
But 4m+1 is not equal to 4k + 1, 4m + 1 is an element of your set R with m = 2k
Sep 5, 2019 03:33
To gain entrance into the set R, it needs to be of the form 4m + 1 for a positive integer m. Surely, 2k is a positive integer. So x = 8k + 1 = 4(2k) + 1 is an element of R
Sep 5, 2019 03:32
@krauser126 exactly! Good job
Sep 5, 2019 03:25
@krauser126 If $n = 8k + 1$ for some positive integer $k$, do you see a way re-write the expression $8k + 1$ as $4m + 1$ where $m$ is another positive integer?
Sep 4, 2019 16:33
I was thinking this: $|f| = |\lim f_n| = \lim |f_n| < \lim g = g$ but im not sure
Sep 4, 2019 16:32
Hi all, I have somewhat of a basic question. Consider of a seqence $\{f_n\}$ such that there is a $g$ with $|f_n| < g$. Suppose $f_n \rightarrow f$ pointwise. Will it follow that $|f| < g$? And how to prove this?
May 5, 2019 02:33
Oh right, ok. Thanks guys
May 5, 2019 02:33
What is MVP?