Apr 12, 2022 20:31
congrats @forest
Mar 29, 2022 15:18
As a clarification for how this works: This election determines a new full-fledged moderator. Elections are for life-time. If a moderator steps down (in good standing) they can be reinstated again without a full election (following a defined process).
3
 

 The Side Channel

Mostly randomly generated noise. – crypto.stackexchange.com
Jan 10, 2022 18:55
@bdegnan well, you could run for it anyways and let the voters decide whether they want you or one of the other candidates?
Jan 7, 2022 09:09
As an update: SE has now acknowledged my request and will schedule the election along with the others in early 2022
Jan 6, 2022 10:40
FYI: I have requested a new moderator election to find my successor. This is fully happening on good terms with everyone involved and there's no drama to be found here. I'm stepping down essentially because I no longer find myself spending much time on Crypto.SE and believe that it's not sensible for such a person to be a moderator. Thank you all for electing and supporting me as a moderator though <3 I will also post a message like this below the election announcement.
Jul 12, 2021 17:49
iacr.org/fellows <- Nice, one of our quite active contributors, Yehuda Lindell, received an IACR Fellowship
Jul 12, 2021 14:32
@MaartenBodewes there was a (negative) validation (of the previous one) using Sage which should simplify this kind of thing
Jul 9, 2021 20:46
88
Q: Does Schnorr's 2021 factoring method show that the RSA cryptosystem is not secure?

TeamBrightClaus Peter Schnorr recently posted a 12-page factoring method by SVP algorithms. Is it correct? It says that the algorithm factors integers $N \approx 2^{400}$ and $N \approx 2^{800}$ by $4.2 \cdot 10^{9}$ and $8.4 \cdot 10^{10}$ arithmetic operations. Does this lead to the conclusion that the R...

Jul 9, 2021 20:46
@ngn Schnorr previously already wrote a similar paper, which was not ... well-received
Jul 9, 2021 19:05
May 19, 2021 12:18
^ we are included in the list of sites this will get tested on
May 19, 2021 12:18
19
Q: The future of Community Promotion, Open Source, and Hot Network Questions Ads

JNatIt's now May, and if Community Promotion or Open Source Ads are something you care about, you may have noticed that there hasn't been a 2021 refresh yet. In case you missed this post, please check it out for some details about why the refresh was pushed back, and why a project around the rethinki...

May 14, 2021 18:07
totally doesn't look at @kelalaka
May 14, 2021 18:07
^ it has been suggested that some kind of merge be done with this question, however, I'm a bit unsure about the direction (i.e. whether the above should be the original or the others)
May 14, 2021 18:06
2
Q: What does it mean for “1^n”(i.e., the security parameter written in unary)?

涂新宇As it is mentioned above, I am confused about “Gen takes as input $1^n$ and outputs a key“. Does it mean that the input of Gen is 1111....111 with length of n?

May 12, 2021 10:15
@Maeher I think the "canonical" SE way if you care about a question is to "follow" it
May 10, 2021 18:48
@JBis I don't know the details but perhaps so the server can look up the user's specific stored authenticator
May 4, 2021 18:49
it appears we didn't make the cut on three vote closure
May 4, 2021 18:49
81
Q: Testing three-vote close and reopen on 13 network sites

CatijaAlmost two years ago I ran a test for single vote closure/reopen on Hardware Recommendations after one of their moderators reached out to me about the strain of being the person doing most of the work to close questions on that site. Shortly after that, Shog9 ran a three-vote test on Stack Overfl...

May 3, 2021 18:50
@kelalaka enough to convince the CM looking at the post
May 2, 2021 20:08
it might take a few days for things to update properly there
May 2, 2021 20:07
@kelalaka the "featured" sidebar is heavily cached
May 2, 2021 19:58
Finally, I also edited the title so it's a bit clearer (I think)
May 2, 2021 19:57
I also answered with the info that the lowering is not automatic and included the info on the expected timeline
May 2, 2021 19:56
re-tagging done
May 2, 2021 19:48
(I'll also temporarily unfeature the cryptocurrency / close reasons roadmap as we only have two featured slots)
May 2, 2021 19:47
we can also feature it, I'll do that
Apr 24, 2021 09:45
@kelalaka FYI I have tightened my wording a bit more
Apr 22, 2021 08:45
Though I kinda fear it might be a bit long
Apr 22, 2021 08:45
0
A: Do we want to update our "Ask Question" side-bar and if so, how?

SEJPMI agree with the more exhaustive proposal initiated by kelalaka that a bulleted list might be helpful. However, I think we should keep it contained to the most common issues we encounter and leave the exhaustiveness to our Help Center. So instead my below suggestion focuses on our four close reas...

Apr 22, 2021 08:45
I have added an alternative side-bar suggestion
Apr 15, 2021 18:32
@bdegnan there are contexts where it is only used as a n-out-of-n secret sharing scheme, in what contexts did you encounter it?
Apr 15, 2021 18:30
@bdegnan ^ what Aman said, the point of shamir secret sharing is to literally provide k-out-of-n threshold secret sharing
Apr 9, 2021 18:21
what you could probably do is copy the state after the update step, finalize the copy and send the hash falling out of that, continuing to update the "original" state
Apr 9, 2021 18:20
the best illustration for how hashes process data is typically that you initialize state, then update state (which either buffers the input or triggers a compression call with the buffer and the state) and then a finalization step
Apr 9, 2021 18:18
asserting that everything seen so far is correct according to the received hash?
Apr 9, 2021 18:18
@bdegnan so you want some kind of "intermediate tags / hash" where the intermediate hash state is inserted into the stream?
Apr 9, 2021 17:52
Grab your popcorn and wait and see what happens this time: eprint.iacr.org/2021/232
Apr 9, 2021 17:51
Schnorr paper update time
Apr 8, 2021 17:42
tumbleweed flies by
Apr 5, 2021 18:44
0
A: Let's formulate our Cryptocurrency Close-Reason!

SEJPMBrief Description Cryptocurrency, not Cryptography Finding a few words that encapsulate the sentiment of this close reason is tricky. This is my attempt to encapsulate that cryptocurrency is not always cryptography while keeping the sentiment that we only ban questions about non-cryptographic a...

Apr 5, 2021 15:11
(I hope you guys like meta, because there will be two meta posts today)
Apr 5, 2021 13:49
0
A: Can We get a Fourth Custom Close Reason Slot for Cryptocurrency Questions?

CatijaIt definitely looks like y'all need some help disambiguating cryptography from cryptocurrency and this seems like a good place to start - that said, this still requires that y'all do the work of closing the questions after the fact. I'd suggest y'all take some time to craft more customized text f...

Apr 5, 2021 10:13
^ this has the details
Apr 5, 2021 10:13
205
A: What are the limits on how I can cast, change, and retract votes?

jjnguyLimits on casting votes The SE network defines a "day" by the UTC/GMT clock. New days start at 00:00:00 UTC/GMT. (The current UTC time is always available to logged-in users.) Post votes (votes on questions and answers; upvotes and downvotes count the same) The exact number of votes available d...

 

 Modeling Matters!

Matters related to modeling matter, because modeling matters!
Jun 15, 2021 18:06
@NikeDattani these should work :) Thanks!
Jun 15, 2021 14:26
paging @Camps as a mod and asker of the question 👀
Jun 15, 2021 14:25
(i.e. a paper or set of papers doing fancy things with random numbers and potentially even having random number generation as a serious performance concern)
Jun 15, 2021 14:24
I'm currently writing a thing about accelerating things with better AES implementations. Given my previous answer (mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/a/1682/1128) it seems matter modelling people do a lot of randomized simulations requiring lots of random numbers. Do you guys by chance have a default paper to reference for such things?