Mykola Pochekai

 Homotopy Theory

A room for anyone interested in homotopy theory, or any nearby...
Jul 4, 2017 08:16
Does anybody have a good references for fact that stable homotopy groups forms generalized homology theory (in sense of Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms)?
 

 Functional Analysis Study Group

This is a room to discuss the lecture notes of Prof. Einsiedle...
Nov 9, 2015 21:04
See ya! Thanks for helping and good night! :3
Nov 9, 2015 21:01
Ok, thanks! I think that your first argument: "You can define $f$ on the subspace $E\oplus[v]$ first and then extend it using Hahn-Banach theorem.", - much simplier than argument on your book.
Nov 9, 2015 20:56
Truly...
Nov 9, 2015 20:48
So, your proof:

So for the modified problem if we assume that $T[E]\ne F$ (i.e. $T$ is not surjective) and if we take and $f\in F^*$ such that $f\ne 0$ but the restriction to $T[E]$ is zero.
Then $T^*(f)=0$, i.e. $f\in\ker T$ and $T$ is not injective.

is right?
Nov 9, 2015 20:35
It is always possible to choose nonzero functional $f$ such that $f|_E = 0$ and $E \subset F$ - closed subspace?
Nov 9, 2015 16:09
Ok, but I like to think about that problem, I always find something new in trying to solve it. :3 So, I will continue to try.
Nov 9, 2015 16:06
Ok, good luck on your deals, and thanks for your helping! It is really useful for me!
Nov 9, 2015 16:05
Oh yes... I knew that injective and topological injective it is not the same, but forget it ):
Nov 9, 2015 16:02
Yes, thats it.
Nov 9, 2015 16:02
Or T is injective and exists some constants c, C > 0 that c ||x|| \leqslant ||Tx|| \leqslant C ||x|| (it is equivalent)
Nov 9, 2015 16:01
T - topological injective iff T - homeomorphism between dom T and Im T (in topological sense)
Nov 9, 2015 16:00
Ok. Hence, it is inaccuracy in the Helemskii textbook.
Nov 9, 2015 15:59
Yes I also notice that, but I think that I am too stupid to understand that is the same.
Nov 9, 2015 15:56
Its ok :3 Do you find remark?
Nov 9, 2015 15:52
Yes but at bottom there must be remark: "Statement (ii) true in two sides, but proof of that difficult, see <refference on Rudin>" or something like that.
Nov 9, 2015 15:50
It is fast, 2 minutes.
Nov 9, 2015 15:50
Ok, but I read it in russian language, so I need to download english version to reffer page
Nov 9, 2015 15:49
I will screen your a page that confused me.
Nov 9, 2015 15:48
Nov 9, 2015 15:47
I think it is error in Khelemsky book.
Nov 9, 2015 15:40
I am too, wait a few minutes...
Nov 9, 2015 15:34
Aw, yes. I think that T(E) may be not closed is problem. I found proof of that fact in Rudin "Functional analysis" theorem 4.15 but he use more powerful methods.
Nov 9, 2015 15:30
Just a minute, I think about your proof.
Nov 9, 2015 15:25
Sorry. I confused problems. Right problem is that: "if $T^* : F^* \to E^*$ is injective than $T : E \to F$ surjective".
Nov 9, 2015 15:23
Banach spaces. T - linear bounded operator. * - adjoint.
Nov 9, 2015 15:19
@MartinSleziak For me too :3 i wanna to find naturally proof of next fact: "if $T^* : F^* \to E^*$ surjective then $T : E \to F$ injective". Proof of that fact are exist, but it use very difficult techniques. I think naturally proof can be finded if we find some good properties of banach adjoint functor. I tried proof that fact the third week in a row 3:
Nov 9, 2015 15:03
Hi there! I am interesting about homological methods in functional analysis, maybe someone else interesting too?