Brian Schroth

rather than point out that someone is "ignorant", merely point out whatever information you allege that they are ignorant of. There is never a need to talk about the person behind a statement rather than the statement itself.

It seems your questions are all of the variety "I don't understand concept X in science, can someone explain it to me?". Those are fine, but they aren't suited for skeptics.SE; they'd be better suited for physics.SE.

skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/2929/… - This one at least hasn't been closed, but it's not much of a question either so I'm a bit surprised it's still open. What's the specific claim to debunk/support? The generic "evolution"?

skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/2987/… - This one was closed for the same reason- it's merely asking for information about Darwin, not specifying any specific claim to debunk/support.

skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/2986/… - this one was closed for being off topic; it is not questioning any specific claim. It is merely asking for information about a subject. Further, you should be aware that this question has absolutely nothing to do with evolution, so I'm not sure why you used the word "evolve" or why you tagged it with "evolution".

So I looked at your profile to see what your questions were, and here's what I found...

If you want to actually discuss this, you should probably link to the questions.