The h Bar

General chat for Physics SE (physics.stackexchange.com). For M...
Nov 12, 2019 16:43
When I was in school, Phds seemed to be about doing what the professor wanted to get done, not anything of one's own volition. I guess the trick is finding a topic that both you and your supervisor are excited about.
Oct 26, 2016 13:59
@PhysicsGuy I dont get it either.
Oct 25, 2016 14:54
charged zealot!
Oct 14, 2016 16:23
@JohnRennie OK. Perfectly acceptable. Worth a try.... :)
Oct 14, 2016 16:20
@JohnRennie How does intrinsic curving work? What is the mechanism?
Oct 14, 2016 16:18
@JohnRennie Is it proven that space in intrinsic? Or assumed so because the extra dimension (extrinsic) has not been sensed?
Oct 14, 2016 16:16
@JohnRennie OK, will do.
Oct 14, 2016 16:07
@JohnRennie Sorry I didnt see it earlier.
Oct 14, 2016 16:06
@JohnRennie I could.
Oct 11, 2016 15:00
@Jim I am the real Jim. Jim is the imposter.
Oct 11, 2016 13:03
@SirCumference I think the default pic is AWESOME!
Jul 21, 2016 17:54
I know, I think this is an inf. Hilbert space in that handwriting....
Jul 21, 2016 17:51
(I am not Paul Davies)
Jul 21, 2016 17:51
Paul Davies cites QM as the reason he believes the world is non-deterministic.
May 2, 2016 17:53
@ACuriousMind Is that from personal experience?
Apr 29, 2016 19:36
Put my question on hold.

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/252909/how-can-there-be-an-infinite-number-of-universes
Apr 29, 2016 19:17
John Rennie hosed me again.... :) (jk)
Apr 26, 2016 15:08
@AmithKK It shouldn't be hard to work out the diff. equation.
Apr 26, 2016 15:04
@dmckee I don't think we'd be able to see a micro-blackhole in space. (I'm referring to the really tiny ones - electron sized or whatever.)
Apr 26, 2016 14:57
@dmckee Yes, proof that they exist. Has anyone ever detected one?
Apr 26, 2016 14:56
Is there any proof for micro black holes?
Apr 26, 2016 14:51
@DavidZ Well, they give back the energy "borrowed" to produce the part./anti-part. pair.
Apr 26, 2016 13:50
So, does the particle/anti-particle notion mean that a 3rd particle can translate or 'jump', by merging with the anti-particle and the remaining particle taking it's place? Is HR then somewhat akin to quantum tunneling?
Apr 25, 2016 20:46
@Slereah "Hello Ladies!" - Clancy Brown (The Kurgan)
Apr 25, 2016 19:06
@NoahP This helps, in the sense it tells me what hawking radiation is NOT. At to what it is, I might need 15 minutes or so to grok QFT.....
Apr 25, 2016 19:00
@JohnRennie We were actually saying in a prayer, hoping you would appear....
Apr 25, 2016 18:53
Every substantive physics question (to a neophyte) turns into Feymann bitching at a reporter about magnets....
Apr 25, 2016 18:52
@ACuriousMind Hmm, so sort of like two wrongs making a right? ;)
Apr 25, 2016 18:48
@NoahP JohnRennie mentioned particles with 'negative energy'. I've never ever heard of that before. Ever.
Apr 25, 2016 18:46
@JohnDuffield Hmm. That's not a particularly good or encouraging sign w.r.t. your comment on the question....
Apr 25, 2016 18:46
@ACuriousMind The site should have its own search.... (but I've heard that b4)
Apr 25, 2016 18:45
@JohnDuffield So, are you saying Hawking radiation is not real?
Apr 25, 2016 18:44
@ACuriousMind Yep, I'm working on it. I still don't know if John Duffield thinks Hawking radiation is a farce.
Apr 25, 2016 18:44
(to avoid duplicate questions - SO needs a better searching mechanism. I've said this like a billion times...)
Apr 25, 2016 18:43
@NoahP Black hole evaporating... yada yada
Apr 25, 2016 18:42
@ACuriousMind I'll delete if you want. (I might be a simpleton, but I can be reasoned with..)
Apr 25, 2016 18:41
@NoahP Ha. That was me....
Apr 21, 2016 15:41
@DanielSank Yes, a variation of a Groucho Marx line. (I think the original had to do with reading a good book.)
Apr 21, 2016 15:40
@JohnRennie I don't. I think it's a reflection of your efforts to explain very complicated subjects.
Apr 20, 2016 20:28
Outside of a dog, solving Physics problems gives me great comfort. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to solve Physics problems.
2
Apr 20, 2016 20:27
It seems to be all about the math. If the math works and is predictive, then the underlying reality (whatever that is) doesn't matter.
Apr 20, 2016 19:26
@JohnDuffield So fields REALLY exist?
Apr 20, 2016 19:20
Virtual Particle Representation (valid?):

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwirseHT953MAhXonIMKHVLGCukQjRwIBw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.physics.adelaide.edu.au%2Ftheory%2Fstaff%2Fleinweber%2Fteaching%2FActionXs24t36gradient.html&psig=AFQjCNETKqTDfoxnp6kU0RO6tDRbvcYULw&ust=1461266384830797
Apr 20, 2016 19:18
<snarky>John is good at telling what things are not, rather than what they are!</snarky> :)
Apr 20, 2016 13:25
I think it was by Mather and Smoot?
Apr 20, 2016 13:20
@ACuriousMind It is part of a video showing stuff winking in and out of existence. It is supposed to be what's happening inside a proton (and responsible for most of its mass).
Apr 20, 2016 13:13
So this is a poor representation of vacuum energy?

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/J3xLuZNKhlY/hqdefault.jpg
Apr 19, 2016 17:36
@Martin If such a machine was developed at Wolfram, it would be "a new branch of science". :)
2
 
Sep 17, 2016 22:14
But isn't each and every electron EXACTLY the same as any other?