Adnan

Thank you @NewMainPosts.

where is everyone?

perhaps haha

assuming you are referring to the moment where a lot of moderators quit being a moderator

oh I think it already became more quiet before that whole mess

what happened

@Anush hello :)

it's a lot more quiet than I remembered it to be

435 days since my last message here in TNB

@DJMcMayhem 05AB1E, 3 bytes: €F)

.

@KevinCruijssen no not yet sorry, I've been very busy the last couple of weeks

I have now added it to the info.txt file

@KevinCruijssen no idea, this is the first one I found that I forgot to document in the info.txt file

@KevinCruijssen Yeah, that is caused by the lazy evaluation of Elixir. I haven't figured out how to fix this, but adding the --no-lazy flag should work: tio.run/##yy9OTMpM/f//…

@Emigna Yep you are correct, 355 is the max not 356

whereas that is not possible with Ž

@KevinCruijssen Well, for numbers between 101 and 356 it can be represented in two bytes

but I haven't found an 8-byter

This one works for 9 as well: ¾4Ƶ{·Dиии

@KevinCruijssen I think this one should work for 9 bytes: 448LDδ4Å0.

I'll ask Dennis for a sync request

@KevinCruijssen Oops, it is now fixed in the latest commit.

@KevinCruijssen Added a comment

@KevinCruijssen Thanks! This should be fixed in the latest commit.

@KevinCruijssen Thank you! Have a nice weekend as well :)

@Emigna Yeah, this is most likely caused by the lazy evaluation of loops etc. I have added the option of using the --no-lazy flag at PR#151 as a quick fix.

@KevinCruijssen Fixed at PR#150.

@KevinCruijssen Currently being fixed at PR#149.

@KevinCruijssen Fixed at PR#148

@KevinCruijssen Nice catch! Fixed at PR#147.

@Don'tbeax-tripledot It is indeed by design, basically because of this example: €D

@KevinCruijssen It retrieves the flat index of a list in a list, for example: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] [4, 5, 6] .k returns 3

My assumption is that it has something to do with the way loops are implemented, but I cannot pinpoint what the problem is

@KevinCruijssen Honestly, I have no idea. I expected the Elixir version to be faster than the Python version, but for some reason this doesn't seem to be the case.

I think I forgot to add it in the docs

@KevinCruijssen .X converts a decimal number to Roman and .v converts from a Roman number to decimal

they keep track of variables within a scope

Of course, this is entirely dependent on the specs of your language, so it's possible that you don't need environments and stuff

Yeah, that should not be a problem, but stuff like environments might bring up some problems

Maintaining stack-based languages can be tricky though, since you would need to consider the design choices at the beginning of the project.

@lirtosiast I am not sure how hard or easy it is to implement a parser like Jelly, but stack-based languages are very easy to implement.

@KevinCruijssen Currently being fixed at PR#146

@Mr.Xcoder I'm not entirely sure what you mean, could you give an example?

Ooh alright, I'll see what I can do

Also, for Å1λ¹L'₆â˜J.VO}s£, why can't you replace ¹L'₆â˜J.V with ¹L₆?

@Mr.Xcoder Currently being checked at PR#145.

@Emigna Also being added right now: PR#144.

@Dennis Thank you!

@Dennis Could you please sync 05AB1E?