Jul 5, 2016 09:14
Balloon Whales for all
Jul 5, 2016 09:13
Jun 1, 2016 12:34
Sometimes yes, sometimes no
May 17, 2016 19:25
I went through his entire stack profiles, you got the best ones. All the questions he has logged are on his superstructure site
May 17, 2016 19:16
Ignore my comment
May 17, 2016 19:16
nevermind, I was wrong
May 17, 2016 19:15
Hey @PavelJanicek when you looked at his user profile, did you look at the meta ones? They have different text :P
May 17, 2016 19:11
full list of insults to person
May 17, 2016 19:07
But any time he gives an opinion, it divebombs
May 17, 2016 19:07
I don't know if he is actually a troll. His actual answers seem to be well recieved for the most part in math and physic SEs
May 17, 2016 19:05
May 17, 2016 19:00
From wikipedia user page: This user encourage disputes and critics, hates JPEG drawings, bigotry and Upload Wizard.
May 17, 2016 18:58
-9
Q: Is is possible to expand the set of allowed HTML features On Stack Exchanges sites?

user2284570Newer versions of HTML introduce features like the contenteditable="true" attribute (for example). Can new HTML features be added to the supported HTML on Stack Exchange sites, or is the list of allowed HTML tags frozen. The Wikimedia projects decided to ban dangerous HTML features as well as t...

May 17, 2016 18:57
Oh wow, I was only looking at his questions on the meta, not his profile information. Lawl
May 17, 2016 18:56
Any more good ones, oh great and masterful expert on the subject matter?
May 17, 2016 18:53
I already read through most of his meta posts on other sites before deciding he was a snob rather than a troll.
May 17, 2016 18:50
Or, you could give it to your enemies!
May 17, 2016 18:49
I don't know. Its possible he has a point, but that since I can't stick my head that far up my ass, I can't see it.
May 17, 2016 18:48
Okay, removed.
May 17, 2016 18:46
However, I have posted a sarcastic comment :-)
May 17, 2016 18:44
I felt that was too aggressive. I'd get told off.
May 17, 2016 18:43
Yeah. I felt like writing up the following:
There are no specific guidelines on formatting at this site. We tend to reject edits that are purely cosmetic here.
It would also be appreciated if you could moderate your tone. A number of comments you have made come across as elitist and condescending. You main problem however appears to be that you take issue with a fundamental aspect of how SE works, and you are welcome to not participate if you don't agree with it. We will mourn your loss dearly.
2
May 17, 2016 18:41
Which in my opinion, actually makes it look worse.
May 17, 2016 18:41
They are very very minor formatting, mostly removing the tiny slant that LaTeX gives the units he talked about.
May 17, 2016 18:40
They do not really help in any way.
May 17, 2016 18:40
I also took the liberty of actually copying his markup into an active edit box, to see the changes.
May 17, 2016 18:38
That is also hilarious
May 17, 2016 18:38
Edited.
May 17, 2016 18:36
I'll try to reword it.
May 17, 2016 18:34
Does my answer come across as neutral, or has some of my irritating leaked in?
May 17, 2016 18:33
I wanted to write something similar to @dot_Sp0T's comment about the door, but I felt that antagonising someone with their frame of mind was probably not a productive effort.
May 17, 2016 18:32
Yeah, I read his meta posts from his top three sites.
May 17, 2016 18:32
Its only snobbish.
May 17, 2016 18:32
Ah, I misremembered it.
May 17, 2016 18:32
Never write SI unit symbols in italic. One hasn’t follow strict guidelines (similar to Wikipedia’s) every time, but there are several things an educated person must do. Writing “m”, “s”, and “kg” in Roman is one of them. – Incnis Mrsi 7 hours ago
May 17, 2016 18:31
May 17, 2016 18:30
And his comment on the answer was frankly, insulting.
May 17, 2016 18:30
His edits were anal, in the non bodily function meaning of the word.
May 17, 2016 18:29
Answered
May 17, 2016 18:26
The markup stuff?
May 17, 2016 18:25
It's called LaTex right? Or MathJax
May 17, 2016 18:21
That is what I'm doing, having waiting a few minutes before typing.
May 17, 2016 18:21
Of course.
May 17, 2016 18:21
His last comment in particular annoys me. He chastices people for not reading things, and then doesn't bother looking up the proper user.
May 17, 2016 18:20
I'm trying to write up a neutral response.
May 17, 2016 18:18
I think the word snobbery is starting to form as my reason for dislike.