The Nineteenth Byte

The Nineteenth Byte: General discussion for codegolf.stackexc...
Sep 12, 2023 15:26
Also I'm not sure if we've had something similar.
Sep 12, 2023 15:25
^ just a rough idea I had, but I have no idea how much it would even make sense. If anyone has any inputs let me know, I'd be happy to discuss!
Jul 28, 2023 13:28
@mousetail what about olds?
Jul 28, 2023 12:03
@mousetail thanks for the link, I thought there must have been something similar, but didn't find it in my first round of searching!
Jul 28, 2023 11:56
@LuisMendo but double has +-Inf, it cannot possibly be finite? :D
Jul 28, 2023 11:56
For clarity, maybe include double as an example of a finite data type — Luis Mendo 4 mins ago
Jul 28, 2023 11:42
@SandboxPosts <--- anyway would anyone mind taking a look at this challenge?
Jul 28, 2023 11:41
can't have been more than a few months
Jul 28, 2023 11:41
but it's barely a pandemic
Jul 28, 2023 10:43
and a few years? It cant have been possibly more than a few months since the monica disaster
Jul 28, 2023 10:43
you mean regarding the AI stuff?
Jul 28, 2023 10:41
Again?
Jul 28, 2023 10:40
haven't been here in a while:)
Mar 28, 2023 08:14
... au chocolat
Feb 3, 2023 10:32
Feb 3, 2023 10:32
looks nice
Nov 27, 2022 20:39
good afternoon, just wanted to say hi and share this: loda-lang.org - it might be interesting for oeis enthusiasts!
Oct 14, 2022 20:53
can you also access the ones of other users?
Oct 14, 2022 20:52
oooh neat:)
Oct 14, 2022 20:51
see, the wrong hat makes your CTU (central thinking unit) completely confused
Oct 14, 2022 20:50
so it definitely is christmas time now
Oct 14, 2022 20:50
I'm pretty sure halloween happened last year
Oct 14, 2022 20:49
I must say I'm a little bit disappointed that you wear a non-christmassy hat now that we're in the christmas season
Oct 14, 2022 20:48
@cairdcoinheringaahing 'grats! may the hat protect your brain cells!
Oct 3, 2022 20:09
@WheatWizard will two mods be elected?
Oct 1, 2022 18:23
@Neil In case you're using numpy arrays instead of lists, you can just B[A] (assuming A is boolean)
Oct 1, 2022 14:28
right I know, but it would be most elegant:)
Oct 1, 2022 14:25
I'd go for arbitrary size integers:)
Oct 1, 2022 14:22
so that would be one avenue to solve the proposed challenge
Oct 1, 2022 14:21
with that theorem you can bound the range in which you have to search for solutions
Oct 1, 2022 14:19
(hence it would have a different focus than your original proposal)
Oct 1, 2022 14:19
or work with a methdo that works for all ranges
Oct 1, 2022 14:19
nothing, but they'd have to find the range themselves
Oct 1, 2022 14:18
and finding the solutinos itself would be relatively simple, but there would be many ways to approach it
Oct 1, 2022 14:17
That would make it trivial to reason about the correctness
Oct 1, 2022 14:17
e.g: Input is an arbitrary polynomial with integer coefficients where all real solutions are integers too. And the output should be all the integer solutions.
Oct 1, 2022 14:16
My suggestion is making a challenge that has a slightly different focus
Oct 1, 2022 14:15
@graffe do you know about the gershgorin circles?
Oct 1, 2022 14:12
brb (in a minute)
Oct 1, 2022 14:11
@graffe that is not actually much more difficult, just a little bit more fluff
Oct 1, 2022 14:11
with only integer solutions
Oct 1, 2022 14:11
but not sure if it has been done: you could extend your challenge to arbitrary polynomials
Oct 1, 2022 14:10
sure!
Oct 1, 2022 14:10
can happen to anyone:)
Oct 1, 2022 14:10
:)
Oct 1, 2022 14:09
you only need to do it 201 times
Oct 1, 2022 14:09
but why 201^5 times?
Oct 1, 2022 14:08
to check if a number is a solution, you just need to plug it into the equation and see if 0 comes out, no?
Oct 1, 2022 14:05
then I guess many people would just iterate over the integers until all solutions have been found
Oct 1, 2022 14:03
What would be your criterion for correctness?