It's one thing for a game to rely heavily on eg. using two analog sticks at the same time, and another for the game to have been made for the four-button + d-pad NES controller
This one time I googled what "ascorbic" means, in the longer-form name of Vitamin C "ascorbic acid". It comes from Latin "a-" (negation) and "scorbutus" --- so literally "anti-scurvy acid".
@BESW Yeah, I've understood the "acid" theory was quite popular: some other sour foods like sauerkraut also worked. (And I mean: vitamin C is a type of acid, so it's not 100% wrong!)
More than that, there's also everything BESW said on the topic. RAW is just a very convenient conversational tool compared to alternatives, for DnD-like games. Perhaps games with a more pronounced design philosophy could offer better alternatives
But thankfully for this particular case the rules do feature a snippet that explains rather clearly (not quite perfectly, but still) what attack is intended to mean in the context of the game: the intent is explained in RAW but only if you know where to look
My favorite example is attack. Without even getting into the "Attack action" vs "attack" case which adds a new layer of obfuscation on its own, it's very reasonable for a newcomer to assume that a Fireball counts as an attack, or a Magic missile. The game recognizes neither as attacks even though in natural language, both of them would obviously be attacks.
That is, they contain a chunk of terminology that appears frequently and is fertile land for confusion due to counterintuitive definitions, while also being relatively clear with their definitions for the most part if one knows where to look.
@Powerdork I guess that'd mean what specifically is meant by discussions about RAW. With DnD 5e in particular I've often found it a useful way to convince people that the rules don't mean what they think they mean, if only because they are somewhat unclear despite being rather explicit.
And we have an exceptionally good culture of friendly discourse, not entirely without its lapses of course but still way better than most open online communities I've seen.
If I had to moderate something (apart from this chat which I kinda do, pretty nominally but still) RPG.se would at least be nice in the sense that it's a fairly low-traffic community
It's been a very long time since I last read the LotR books but the Scouring had some really nice memories to me because it extended the denouement a fair bit, it showed in concrete terms how half a year of waging guerilla war against almost-literal Satan has hardened our heroes, and it gave Saruman a nice send-off that somehow reminds me of the works of Dante Alighieri
One of my favorite parts of the LotR novels is one that made it to no film: how Frodo et co, after saving the world, return to the Shire and have to do one last adventure to kick out some bandit warlords who have set up shop there.
A couple of months back there was a news story headlined something like "Truck drives into tram's overhead powerlines --- not the first time the tram has caused problems in Tampere"
The discussion took well over ten hours and judging from the opposition to the initiative it sounded almost like a tram is like the worst thing that can happen to a city