@TomMcW the ILS 36C puts GINIE at 5NM from the threshold, which would leave you at 1993ft thus well within rounding errors. I wonder why they're shown as different distances.
Thanks, I'll give those a try - says it can't read them, I'll have to have a look tomorrow. The first one works though, I'll play around with that one a bit
Got my turbocharger and retractable gear endorsement yesterday in a pa28rt-201. That elevator though, first take off I struggled to get it off the ground it needed so much force (yes it was trimmed correctly).
@TannerSwett I hear it used regularly - that is, using both numbers - when listening to KFMY tower (they have a 13/31, but usually one of 5/23 is in use).
@ymb1 As for what you should vote, that's up entirely up to you. Vote your own conscience, no one tells you how to vote (at least they shouldn't) - that's what makes a site community driven.
In this particular case I don't think it's good question though, since a quick google will give you all that information (and that particular question is unlikely to end up high on google which would make a case for answering it anyway - to provide better/more succinct information in a google search), but that shouldn't be confused with being a duplicate.
@ymb1 My opinion is that if the answer to a question can be found in a different answer - but that question didn't actually ask for it - chances are the "answer" is peripheral in nature (with respect to that other question) and it'd be better of to get its own answers. The key for me is the ability to provide more information to a question. That's not how it works on Aviation.SE, but I don't have the energy to fight it.
Ah yes the old "the other question has an answer that I decide answers this question sufficiently and can thus this one can be closed, even though the other question didn't ask about it, and this question could generate better answer and we don't want that"-duplicate. ;)
@TomMcW yes, the up down part yes, but it grabs air from the top and shows it into the wind at the bottom creating higher pressure... I'm sure my reasoning is flawed though :)
@TomMcW Maybe. I always envisioned it like the rotating object "took" air from the top and pushed it into the air at the bottom (increasing the pressure there, pushing it up) - in the case of a fastball that is obviously.. ;)
@Pondlife In my contracts there's a caveat that I'll only get reimbursed up to some maximum amount / gallon when renting wet (a reference value tied to the cost of fuel at the local field + some percentage). Don't know if you have any of that, figured it might be worth mentioning.
Let's take a look to itinerary of a flight from Dubai to Tokyo taken here
And from Tokyo to Dubai
It's the same airline.
One more example. Here is the route of flight from Istanbul to Tokyo
And from Tokyo to Istanbul
Can somebody explain why return route is so different flying from Ea...
@Federico it's fascinating how biased a mind can be. Once I saw the picture of the roughed up antonov I was like "yep, that's an antonov", but it didn't click when it was all shiny and maintained. :P
If I am not horribly mistaken, it seems to be an Antonov 72 or 74, that were produced together, hence the similarity.
Another image (not included for copyright reasons) can be found here.
The wikipedia article classifies it as a "transport aircraft". It mentions a VIP transport variant and a ma...
@Shalvenay Yeah, that bolt was behind a sealed access panel anyway though. Just a general remark, I always check all accessible cotter pins on my walk-arounds. I know people who don't. :P
The Hangar
The Hangar
Let's take a look to itinerary of a flight from Dubai to Tokyo taken here
And from Tokyo to Dubai
It's the same airline.
One more example. Here is the route of flight from Istanbul to Tokyo
And from Tokyo to Istanbul
Can somebody explain why return route is so different flying from Ea...
If I am not horribly mistaken, it seems to be an Antonov 72 or 74, that were produced together, hence the similarity.
Another image (not included for copyright reasons) can be found here.
The wikipedia article classifies it as a "transport aircraft". It mentions a VIP transport variant and a ma...