« first day (754 days earlier)      last day (3988 days later) » 

12:18 AM
@Monica Cellio and @double aa: What's ironic about this case is that if @moridoweedhyaagob just used the common
spelling of Gemara (or even Gemoro, as some here do) instead ofmaking up his own spelling of Gamoro, the G could be pronounced as a J. Have you thought about that, Doweedh?
 
1:01 AM
@SethJ jemoro? jemara? lol
@SethJ jamoro is what i will use if you will understand what i am saying. if not then ill stick with gamoro :)
 
1:42 AM
@moridoweedhyaagob my point is that if you follow a G with an E you (often) get the sound of a J. So there's really no need to write a J.
 
1:54 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob not speaking for Seth, but I would prefer that you use one of the three transliteration schemes that we all already deal with -- Ashkenazi, Israeli, or academic. I'm not motivated to put much effort into learning a fourth, especially one that is a small niche (you are the only person I've seen use this scheme). You'll do what works best for you; I'm just pointing out that it comes with a cognitive load for the rest of us, and you should not be surprised if sometimes we don't meet it.
 
 
2 hours later…
3:31 AM
@SethJ ge sounds like j? geh not is in the throat or back of the tongue. j is your tongue hitting the front of the teeth
@MonicaCellio what is academic? also there is nothing really to learn. if you know the context of the word in which it is being used. and you know the word itself. you can make it out just fine ;)
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob As in "germ" (or German/y). Or geriatric. Or genetic.
 
@SethJ do you read gemara as germany?
jermara
 
3:47 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob No. Dude, I'm just saying that you can pronounce "Ge" as "Je", so there is no need to spell it with a J if you use the more common spelling of Gemara (or even Gemoro) instead of Gamoro. And nobody would be confused. It would fit your pronunciation, and it would be clear to everyone here.
 
@SethJ how does gemara sound like j if you are reading it in regular hebrew?
@SethJ :( iim lost
 
 
9 hours later…
12:27 PM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob academic books/journals/etc tend toward things like 'w' for vav, 'h' with a dot under it for chet, precise use of the apostrophe to signal 'ayin, 'q' for kuf, etc. I suspect a lot of this was established back when just including the Hebrew was a bigger typesetting challenge, and knowing exactly what letters you're talking about s important.
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob it's obvious to you because you're writing it. To me what you write is sometimes a write-only language. I'm just saying that sometimes I'm just not going to make the effort to solve the Dhoweedh cypher; life is too short and this site is full of people whose writing I can understand. Sorry about that, but I figured it was better to tell you than quietly ignore you much of the time.
 
1:20 PM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I. Can't. Help. You.
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob You really don't understand what I mean?
It's a letter 'G', for crying out loud. It has two sounds. One in the back of the throat, and one in the front of the mouth. The latter sound is identical to the sound a 'J' always makes. It is usually indicated by being followed by the letters 'I', 'E', or 'Y'. "Gemara" has an 'E' after the 'G': GEmara. Just because everyone else pronounces it like it has a back-of-the-throat sound, that does not mean you have to. And the choice of the letter 'E' is more intuitive than the letter 'A' anyway.
...so "Gemoro" works better all around: you get your 'J' sound (which is the important part), and everyone else can recognize the word because it's what they're used to. (Using 'O's after the 'M' and 'R' instead of an 'A' works, as I think others will recognize either.) Of course all of this is up to you; I'm just trying to explain my point. I hope it makes sense now.
 
1:47 PM
I think this answer avoids the question altogether. Any proof with "loopholes" is not a valid proof. Also, any proof that relies on facts that are "hidden from human eyes" cannot be a logically deduced proof. This is why every "logical" proof of the existance of God that I have seen is unconvincing, which is exactly what the OP is asking about. — Daniel 4 mins ago
Am I the only one who thinks he's avoiding the question with that answer?
 
2:39 PM
@Daniel I don't think he's trying to prove the existence of G-d. I think he's trying to show that contemporary models of proof don't work.
(I'm not sure it's a good answer, or that he makes his case, but I think that's his intent.)
 
@SethJ I don't think he's trying to prove God in this answer. I do think that he's arguing that the common proofs of God are true, and that anybody who disagrees with them simply does not understand that people can't understand everything
But that defeats the purpose of a proof!
 
@Daniel But that's not the question. The question is, do we need these proofs?
 
The premise of the question is "Nowadays, many of the classic philosophical arguments for God's existence (argument from design, ontological, cosmological) have either been disproven, or simply found not to be very convincing."
My understanding is that he is trying to undermine that premise with his answer
But I think he makes a circular argument in the process
 
@Daniel So downvote his answer.
 
@SethJ I did. But since it also has two upvotes, I'm trying to understand why two people upvoted it
Because I wonder if I am missing something
 
2:50 PM
@msh210 Thanks(rev.#34).
 
@seth-j yea but which hebrew speaking person pronounce Gemara as jemara? Yes ge makes a j sound in English but not in hebrew. So yes if it was an English word I would use ge obviously but this is not the case here :)
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob He's saying that since you already write gamoro which is not in accordance with the way you would pronounce it, but is still different from the standard way that we expect it to be written, why not just write it the standard way "gemara" or even "gemoro"?
That way, it makes more sense to us because it looks more standard
And it even conveys the j sound because of the "ge" if you want to read it that way
unlike "gamoro" which does not
 
@monica-cellio I can do academic however I won't use dots or w.e I will use sS for a sSadi hH for a hHeth or a 7 aA for aAyeen or 3 I can deal with q for quf although I use g because I say guf :)
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob why not just use the academic standard the way it is, like "dh" for the "th" sound as in "the"?
You don't need to make us understand exactly the way you pronounce it
 
I don't see the difference between ge n ga that is why I was typing gamoro instead of jamoro since atleast I have a g there so you know what I am saying
 
2:59 PM
As long as you are conveying the proper spelling, it's fine
 
@daniel oh yea I missed th n dh
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I actually find academic the hardest to read of the three styles I listed. But at least it has conventions. OTOH, I have no idea what you mean by sS or 7 ro 3, though I've seen you use the latter two and when you do I just shrug and move on.
 
I do use them when typing as evident from my typing
 
I've seen you use numbers in the middle of words in chat. I have no idea what you mean when you do this. And even if you tell me I'm probably not going to remember, because in my experience nobody else does that so I'll only ever see it from you.
 
@MonicaCellio I think that the 3 is used for Ayin informally because it looks like the Arabic letter Ayin
 
3:03 PM
@Daniel thanks. Since I don't read Arabic that association is completely lost on me.
 
7 is hHeth 5 is sSadhee 3 is aAyeen
Also I use w for wow not v
 
ah, you mean 7 is chet and 5 is tzadi and 3 is 'ayin. I'm never going to remember that, sorry. And becuase you use vowels very differently than I do, I'm not going to get hints that way. (You use w for vav. See what I mean?)
 
:9726046 Sorry, I got confused for a second
That was wrong
 
NP.
Off to meet my chevruta -- later, all.
 
@MonicaCellio Learn something interesting :)
2
 
3:12 PM
@SethJ Welcs.
 
@Daniel (I haven't yet caught up on backread here, but:) IMO he's disputing a stated premise of the question (viz that the classical proofs have been debunked), which is a valid thing to do generally. The problem here is that that stated premise need not have been stated: the question is a good one without it.
 
@msh210 Yes, continue with the backread
 
@Daniel I don't see that it's circular. It's simply saying what scientists propose as a method of proof is an insufficient one.
@Daniel Am doing.
@MonicaCellio I've seen it before for Hebrew also. (Rarely.)
 
@msh210 Well then I don't understand what the question is about
Are we talking about scientific proofs or are we talking about some strange "proof" concept that doesn't have anything to do with logic
and that we don't understand
Because I see that as the exact same thing as emunah
 
3:20 PM
@Daniel The question asks about proof "through philosophical and logical arguments". I don't know that a scientist would call those scientific.
 
@msh210 He would
 
@Daniel Yes, it does sound rather similar. :-)
 
But that's really what I mean anyway
@msh210 So if the question is whether we need logical proofs, or whether emunah is good enough, it doesn't answer the question to say that logic works, but it's this weird kind of logic that is really emunah
 
@Daniel if that's the answer then it does answer the question: it's saying emuna is enough. :-) But I don't think that's precisely the answerer's intent.
 
Can you link q pls
 
3:23 PM
@msh210 Right. That's why I downvoted. Because his intent is clearly different from what he is saying
 
@msh210 I think the answerer's intent is something like this: A proof of God's existence is necessary (or a Good Thing), but the ones provided by sages of generations past are good ones. We should trust those proofs (emunas chachamim or something), even though we hsould not have blind emuna in God's existence itself.
3
Q: Halachic Relevancy of 'Proving God'

Eilu V'EiluThe first halacha in the Mishnah Torah states that you must know for certain that God exists (Yesodei Hatorah 1:1). Does this mean that according to Rambam, God can be proven to exist through philosophical and logical arguments? Nowadays, many of the classic philosophical arguments for God's ex...

 
It's like saying "It's impossible for you to make me a peanutbutter sandwich because I am a human and cannot turn into peanut butter"
 
@Daniel If the answerer's intent is as I explain above then I think he worded it okay (though more explanation would help). I didn't upvote it because I don't think it's a logical answer or well supported by the quotations he includes.
 
@Daniel OK, now I see your problem with it.
@msh210 See, I think it's just a bad answer.
 
@SethJ You mean, written badly, or illogical, or what?
 
3:28 PM
Alex Miller on June 03, 2013

Welcome to Stack Exchange Podcast #48! Our guest today is Jorge Castro, member of the Community Team at Canonical (of Ubuntu fame). We also have Robert Cartaino, our very own Director of Community Development, here at Stack Exchange, as well as the usual suspects – David Fullerton, Jay Hanlon, and Joel Spolsky..  Our guest Jorge Castro works on Ubuntu, at Canonical. He says to pretend it’s double Os instead of U’s: Ooboontoo. (David, Jay, and Joel work on Stack Exchange, at Stack Exchange.) …

 
@msh210 mean poorly thought out and not coherent. He may have had several disjointed thoughts going on at once (that all make sense to him) that have nothing (or little) to do with each other, and he may have gotten sidetracked on a side-point while writing his answer. I do this sometimes, but I usually catch myself and finish my thought and tie the different elements together, sometimes before clicking 'Submit', sometimes with an edit.
 
we need to use the sciences and philosophies of our times, which is up to date, and use it to our advantage to prove HaShem. We can't understand Him but we can prove Him being "existent" – MoriDoweedhYaAgob 11 hours ago delete
:)
 
@SethJ @msh210 When this happens it's usually because I've run out of coffee in my cup. :)
 
ISO 259 is a series of international standards for the romanization of Hebrew, dating to 1984, with updated ISO 259-2 (a simplification, disregarding several vowel signs, 1994) and ISO 259-3 (Phonemic Conversion, 1999). See also *List of ISO transliterations *ISO 233 for Arabic transliteration External links * http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~ornan/maamarim/taatiq-latini/ISO.doc
 
I forgot my log in thing for se I am automatically signed in n I want to sign in on the schools comp how do I find out my info?
 
3:37 PM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Do you not use OpenID?
Otherwise, there should be a "forgot your password" link on the login screen
 
Ok, I'll be waiting for this story in chat :) — Daniel 52 mins ago
@Daniel You may be waiting a while...
 
Idk I think I do
 
;)
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob So try the different OpenID options
If that doesn't work, then try the forgot your password link
@HodofHod noooooo That sounds like a fantastic story
 
Nm I got in with google lol
 
3:40 PM
Cool, when did christianity.se gradutate?
 
@HodofHod last week
 
@msh210 mazel tov?
 
in The Upper Room, May 30 at 17:37, by msh210
Hey, congratulations, guys. :-)
Oh, I just saw this:
in The Upper Room, May 30 at 18:11, by wax eagle
ooh community promotion ads are live. anyone have any ideas for what we should advertise?
in The Upper Room, May 30 at 18:26, by El'endia Starman
Maybe Mi Yodeya and Islam.SE too?
in The Upper Room, May 30 at 18:27, by wax eagle
@El'endiaStarman very possibly, we can let those communities decide if they'd like to place an ad
IMO no. Anyone else?
 
@msh210 I'm going to say no, too. Those who are genuinely curious will come of their own accord, methinks. As they have until now.
 
What are community promotion ads?
Each S.E. community gets to choose which other S.E. communities to advertise?
 
3:46 PM
5
Q: Community Promotion Ads - 2013

Grace NoteAs it is December 2012, we are now going to reset our Community Promotion Ads for the new year. What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting pro...

@Daniel Each community can choose to advertise pretty much anything they like. (I'm sure there are some kind of content limits, but I don't know what they are)
 
@HodofHod Obviously, your and my saying no won't stop someone from proposing such an ad there if he so desires.
 
@msh210 Obviously. And b'dieved, I'm not sure I would have much of a problem with that. L'chatchila, I don't think it's necessary, and possibly a little inadvisable. The last thing anyone from this community wants is to start getting questions like /r/Judaism.
 
@HodofHod s/start getting/get more/ , yeah.
 
@msh210 Fair enough.
Proposal: Next one we get, can we please go full troll on them?
2
(Pretty please?)
 
@HodofHod That sounds like fun :)
The other day, a really strange thing happened to me
 
3:58 PM
@HodofHod you want to invade my house :O
?
 
I was sitting in my car waiting for my sister to come out of Walgreens and a lady stops her car in front of mine
I was in a parking spot
And she pulls her car up in the row of parking spots in front of me
and was staring at me
but I thought she was looking at the door to Walgreens
 
everyone was doing the dinosaur?
lol
 
Then she drives her car around behind me and stares at me again
Then she pulls around back in front of me again
I assume that she saw my kippa
Because she pulls out a little cross, points it at me through her car window for a couple of seconds
and then drives off
I really wanted to go up to her and tell her "Thank you so much! After all of these years, you've finally convinced me!"
 
you live in cali right?
 
@Daniel Maybe she was trying to fend you off, like a demon or something.
2
 
4:01 PM
@Daniel "pew! pew!"
 
@mods can one of the mods change the link in this comment: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/29195/… -- I accidentally put the wrong link, and I don't want to just delete it and repost it, because it will ruin the flow of the comments.
 
@Menachem Done.
 
@msh210 Well I think my kippa was hiding my Jew horns pretty well so...
 
@msh210 thanks
 
4:31 PM
14
Q: Would quick-link support for BibleGateway be... useful?

Shog9So... Congratulations on graduating to a full-fledged Stack Exchange site! We'd kinda like to do something special for y'all, and this is currently the top-ranked feature request: Add Markdown and/or OneBox support for BibleGateway That said, oneboxing is troublesome. BibleGateway doesn't offer...

awwwww.....
 
4:51 PM
This may be worth stealing:
First of all, please take the time when composing a question to follow norms of grammar and spelling to the best of your ability. We don't mind helping, but we need to see here. This is supposed to be a place for experts, which puts us more on the academic end of things. Please write as if you were submitting your work in a professional or public setting. — Caleb 7 hours ago
 
@msh210 I agree. Every so often, we get a prolific questioner who can't be bothered with that stuff
 
5:07 PM
@Ali You have been warned against continuing to try to prove or convince people on Mi Yodeya that all Jews are Muslim, or all Muslims are Jewish, or all Muslims are Muslim, or whatever this idea you have is, and against proselytizing. I'm warning you now (though I think this has been done already) not to do so in the site's associated chat rooms, either.
4
 
@HodofHod thanks; I'd seen many but not all of those convensions. I guess they're aiming for single grapheme, hence no "th","sh", etc. Still 'c' for tzadi seems like it would throw me. :-)
 
Ali
@msh210 This is no way proseleytization
 
@MonicaCellio FWIW Hungarian pronounces the spelling <c> as /ts/. I think some other languages do, too.
 
@MonicaCellio Yeah, me too.
 
Ali
ok no Islamic discussions here
 
5:11 PM
@Ali That's probably a good idea for you, though that's not what I said.
 
We should probably move this convo back to the other room
 
@Ali Perhaps not. I added it in there mostly because I was warning you against the other stuff already.
 
Ali
@msh210 Are you a math professor?
 
@Ali No.
 
I request that today's apparent spill-over from the dialogue chat room be moved to that chat room.
 
5:14 PM
@IsaacMoses I'm on it :)
 
@AlUmmatمجاهد shukran jazilan
 
Ali
Is that even possible for inter site transfers?
 
@AlUmmatمجاهد Thanks.
 
Ali
@msh210 Can you inform a policy of what kind of discussions are allowed \ not allowed here?
 
@IsaacMoses Al Affuw (العفو)
@msh210 no problem :)
 
5:18 PM
4 messages moved from Islam and Judaism dialogue
 
@msh210 thank you; I was catching up on backread and was about to say the same thing. This is not the place for whatever it is that you're trying to do, Ali. Stop it.
 
@msh210 Toda rabba :)
 
Also, we have already told you approximately a gazillion times how Judaism defines Jews, and religion versus peoplehood, and all that. If we didn't want it the first time we sure don't want it in reruns.
 
@IsaacMoses عَفْوًا
 
5:21 PM
@msh210 I like it, but I'd rework the penultimate sentence for our context (which explicitly includes "those interested in learning more")
 
@msh210 Gezundheit.
 
@IsaacMoses yeah.
 
Nice full room here right now :)
 
12
Q: Saying "Laberiut" "God bless you" or "Gesundheit"

Hacham GabrielIs there are source for saying "Laberiut" "God bless you" "Gesundheit" or any other response to a sneeze? In other words, are there posekim who mention it in Halacha?

 
@Daniel Twelve people, though I'm not sure we have a minyan. ;-)
 
Ali
5:23 PM
@MonicaCellio But can't it be possible for a professor of a complex subject say like a Masters in game theory not knowing much about it. It happens many a times that students know more about the subject more than the professor, I have seen this happening
 
About ads, I concur with what the others said -- I don't think we need to specifically advertise on C.SE, but if something shows up there, shrug. Also, the SE ad engine pulls questions for ads on its own, in addition to the community-promotion ads; my very first view of the new C.SE design included an ad for a Mi Yodeya question! (I forget which one, though.)
 
@Ali It happens many times that some students know a particular aspect of the professor's subject, which aspect the professor doesn't happen to know. It hardly ever happens that the students know more about the professor's subject than he.
3
 
Ali
Also this happens in creative fields like painting , designing where many times students out do the professors
 
And it's "many times" or "many a time" not "many a times". Just fyi.
 
Mar 1 at 1:58, by Isaac Moses
In interactions with people of other religions, the basis of mutual respect is to start from an assumption that you don't and won't have a better understanding of their beliefs and practices than they have.
3
 
5:26 PM
@msh210 Well if we're counting Muslims as Jews as Ali seems to want, maybe we could have a minyan :)
 
@Daniel Other room
2
 
@Ali you have consistently demonstrated that this characterization, even if true in some cases, does not hold for you. You have no credibility on Jewish topics, which means the sources you prefer (which tend to have "islam" in their names) also have no credibility here.
2
I'm done. Sorry, @IsaacMoses, I didn't realize I wasn't keeping up with the room.
 
@MonicaCellio Not sure what you're apologizing for
 
And if this meta-discussion about what's okay here re-enters discussion about Islam, I'm going to start spam-flagging or at least deleting messages, @Ali, all.
2
 
@IsaacMoses continuing to engage.
(I took your comment to Daniel as "take it to the other room" -- maybe I misunderstood. Anyway, don't want to keep Ali's argument going here.)
 
5:30 PM
@MonicaCellio I was referring specifically to Daniel's (albeit in jest) reference to questions of personal status
 
@HodofHod some related discussion in the Library starting here: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9691908#9691908
in The Library, 2 days ago, by Monica Cellio
@Shog9, if what you end up asking for is the BG-specific implementation, could you ask the devs to look at the Mi Yodeya feature request just for background? Not because I expect them to do that too, but they may notice something design-wise that could make doing that easier later. Or, at least, they shouldn't do anything that will make doing that harder later.
To which Shog said: yeah.
@IsaacMoses ah. Ok, thanks. As I said, hard to keep up at the moment. :-)
 
@MonicaCellio Thanks for speaking up for our interests in your characteristically fair and diplomatic way
 
@Ali If the discussion is about another's religion/culture, then rejecting a view that is antithetical to that is not only constructive but is entirely the point of the discussion (from the perspective of the person whose religion/culture is being discussed).
 
5:54 PM
@Ali this discussion is more fit in the other room
 
@Ali take it elsewhere. If you keep it up I will delete (not move) inappropriate messages.
 
Ali
I better leave then
 
@AlUmmatمجاهد I concur. @Ali, as I've already stated, I'm done arguing with you; that's what it is, an argument, not a debate, because trolls don't debate, they argue, and they refuse to stop, ever, never ceasing, like the Energizer Bunny, or the Nile, or the universe, or 42, or this run-on sentence...
 
@SethJ or............................
 
6:26 PM
1
Q: Add question title to comment links for links to other SE questions

Charles KoppelmanOften, we put things in comments like "related: judaism.se.com/question/1244" (e.g., Garments that unintentionally require tzitzit). In a "post" (question or answer) these get rendered as the text of a question (see above). In a comment, however, it's simply related: http://judaism.stackexchang...

 
 
3 hours later…
9:24 PM
Global creepy search finds someone who probably Googled us up and considered the result to be a useful reference: answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130529173243AAVMhgx
 
@IsaacMoses nice
one step closer to being the next Wikipedia
 
Hello!
 
@Charlie Hi there, Charlie
 
@Daniel hi, Daniel, how are you?
 
@Charlie Quite well
It's been a busy day at work
How about you?
 
9:40 PM
@Daniel good, I'm good
 

« first day (754 days earlier)      last day (3988 days later) »