« first day (472 days earlier)      last day (4124 days later) » 

6:28 PM
@JackDouglas Virginia Woolf, The Letters of Virginia Woolf: Vol II, 1912-1922, 1975:
> I read the book of Job last night — I don't think God comes well out of it.
Source (in comments).
 
@TRiG People often know what kind of a God they want to believe in even if they aren't sure they believe in God at all :)
I find that curious
Far be it for God not to be created in my image ;)
4
Q: What options did Mary have in mind with Gabriel's greeting?

Jon EricsonWhen Gabriel visited Mary, she was, as is usual when meeting an angel, troubled by it: In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. And the virgin's name was Mary. And h...

thinking about answering this
anyone know of an angelic visitation in the Bible that isn't accompanied by fear in the visited?
and what proportion have an element of confusion about whether the visitor is man or angel?
 
@JackDouglas Do you? I don't.
I have quite strong opinions on the character(s) of g/God(s), actually.
 
Why do people expect (a) God to fit into their ideas of what He should be like, morally or otherwise? (I already think I know the answer, secretly we all think we are the ultimate judge of morality, which is why we all know which laws it is ok for us to break)
I heard someone having a right old moan about getting a ticket for doing 29 in a 20 zone last week, and I managed to restrain myself from shouting that line from Liar Liar: "Quit breaking the law, *******!"
 
@JackDouglas We all are judges of morality, our own and others. It behooves us to do our best to be good judges.
 
@TRiG good judges in whose opinion? our own? I spot a flaw in that argument ;)
 
6:44 PM
@JackDouglas It is sort of circular, but I think it has to be.
 
the mum who's kid gets mown down in the 20 zone disagrees fundamentally on whether speeding is a petty offence
 
@JackDouglas Most of us can agree that callous disregard for others' lives is a bad thing; even while we all do it. (Ref. "The ones who walk away from Omelas".)
 
@TRiG easily overcome by dehumanising a group, then their lives 'don't count'
whether it is Tutsis, Muslims, non-Aryans, etc
 
@JackDouglas Or if they're just far enough away, and the causal chain long enough, we can disregard our contribution to their misfortune. (Ref. the entire western world, most definitely including myself.)
However, let us return to our sheep.
;)
 
had to google that :)
 
6:48 PM
The character of God. I don't particularly expect God to be kind, just, whatever .... I don't expect God to exist. That doesn't mean I can't form an opinon on the characters of various gods as expressed by their followers.
@JackDouglas It's a good phrase.
There is the line that most gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child. (I can't remember who said that, but it does contain a certain amount of truth.) But it's not the entire truth. Most gods are complex creatures (probably because they have many worshippers, each of whom have different perspectives).
 
Of course, but surely it is logical to expect that if there is a God, He is unlikely to be nice and cosy in exactly the way we'd like him to be, even if only because our small brains and 'breath-like' lifespans mean we probably have picked up some funny ideas about morality ourselves along the way?
I understand people who are taken aback by the God of the Bible (I often am), but not those who say "I refuse to believe in that God" as if his existence of otherwise somehow depends on their say so!
 
And I've said before that I'd rather like to be Liberal Christian, but I can't convince myself it's true. (Also, I'm somewhat wary of beliefs I like. I stayed a Witness for longer precisely because I was gay, and therefore distrusted my own reasons for leaving. It can be hard to explain that to people.)
@JackDouglas Well, I think what's happening there is actually a conflation of different definitions of the slightly slippery word believe (particularly in its form as a phrasal verb: believe in). I could say, perhaps, that I wouldn't reverence such a God.
 
@TRiG I can understand that if you mean you didn't want to be open to the accusation (even from yourself) that I was making above? ie "I wont believe in that God because it's not convenient"?
@TRiG ah yes, terminology again :)
that is quite a different thing and in my opinion not arrogant in the same way
 
@JackDouglas Precisely. But it's surprising how hard it can be to get that point across to some people.
@JackDouglas It is quite a different thing, at least in my mind and your mind, but .... I think you're not entirely wrong there. Some people are perfectly happy to say they believe things because they like them. And definitions can get very slippery in this area.
> A thing is not necessarily true because a man died for it.
Oscar Wilde.
And people who "believe" things while not knowing whether they're true. That's ... a different definition of belief than the one I'm used to. I know a woman who believes in reincarnation, because she finds the idea comforting. I don't know what to do with that sort of thing. My brain gives up on it.
 
@TRiG How long did they know you are gay before you left if you don't mind me asking? The associate minister at my last church has just come out. Then he wrote this (I haven't read it so fair warning you may find it offensive)
Still haven't worked out what I think
We left the church under something of a cloud which makes it all the more difficult to think rationally...
 
7:04 PM
@JackDouglas ... a gay lifestyle. It would be very very difficult to explain, without a lot of context, why that phrase gives me pause. On the other hand, it's significantly better than the version with the definite article. Shall continue reading.
Hmm. Ends with a rather bald assertion. Not convincing to me, but then, I'm not the target audience.
 
@TRiG I imagine it is written to Christians and people who want to be Christians?
I know, I know, I should read it myself
 
@JackDouglas It's more a series of evangelising tips than anything else, really. It's not marketing: it's guidance for the marketeers.
@JackDouglas And it's not very long.
 
you call it marketing, we call it love ;)
terminology again...
 
@JackDouglas ... Nah. It's very definitely marketing. That's not a disagreement about terminology. It's about the tactics and methods used.
 
@TRiG it's not the length, its that anything from St Marys brings back painful memories of us leaving
 
7:09 PM
@JackDouglas Ah. Right.
If you want a similarish perspective, you could try a now abandoned blog by "College Jay". Right up your street.
 
@TRiG can love not have tactics? Isn't that what writing poetry and buying flowers is about? Not that I've ever done the former I hasten to add...
 
@JackDouglas Take it up with Fred Clark (Slacktivist). ;)
 
googles again
 
> As an antidote, to remind myself that religious people are not necessarily evil, I hang around slacktivist.
 
I'm sure I could spend half my life there (but I won't of course!) :)
Not sure what to think about "College Jay"
but I'm comfortable with that: I don't think I understand more than a few percent of what I read or hear in an average day :)
 
7:20 PM
@JackDouglas Well, nor am I. But he's Side B, which is tricky for me to get a hold on. I used to read his blog a fair bit when it was still active.
@JackDouglas Slacktivist is one of the best writers I know. His blog is a simply astounding resource. (He's particularly famous for his analysis of Left Behind, which isn't just a snarky response, but a proper, thorough, meaningful, and thought-out, multi-post epic which has been going on for years.)
 
@TRiG actually I hadn't registered that it was one person
 
@JackDouglas There is a community there, it that there are regular commenters whose names would be recognised, but the actual posts are all written by Fred Clark himself. He used to write for a newspaper, and he's been blogging on faith, politics, and literature for a very long time now.
 

« first day (472 days earlier)      last day (4124 days later) »