« first day  last day (15 days later) » 

12:04 AM
i mean ‘reinterpret’
If the equal sign doesn’t mean equal there’s a shot
 
12:15 AM
Oh that's interesting.
Then what can the equal sign be defined as?
 
 
1 hour later…
1:23 AM
sorry, was busy
The idea is to replace $\sum_{i=0}^\infty$ in $$\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_n = a$$ with some other operator $T$ that replicates some features of $\sum$. The simplest example is the alternating ones. Instead of summing, you can take the average of the partial sums
for a_n = 1,-1,1,-1,1,...
standard partial sums s_n = 1,0,1,0,1,0,...
and the average of partial sums is
1, 1/2, 2/3, 1/2, 3/5, ...
which does converge to 1/2 if you check it right
if a series converges normally, then it "converges" in this sense as well, and to the same "sum". And its linear, like summation. So it somehow manages to extend summation of usual convergent series
this is called Cesaro summation, but not everything about summation is preserved. If you put in lots of zeros, i.e. replace a_1+a_2+a_3+... with a_1+0+..+0+a_2+0+... then you can spoil Cesaro summability
Tao observed that this and other generalised summability methods work by "smoothing" the sharp cut-off in the partial sum
I'll leave it at that for now and drop some resources. First, there should be many places for Cesaro summation, since it is known that Fourier series of continuous functions Cesaro-converge back to the original function. I would guess a readable intro to Fourier analysis is Stein and Shakarchi's first book.
A book specifically devoted to divergent series is Hardy's Divergent Series
and I don't really understand Ramanujan summation but these notes exist which are now in book form
The fact that the Fourier series of continuous functions Cesaro converges is not because it converges normally. See third-last paragraph of 'Pointwise Convergence' section in this wiki page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
 
1:52 AM
Thanks for the explanation. Honestly, this stuff is a bit of a stretch for me. It'll take a while to digest all of it.
 
Fourier series in general could be another idea. Cantor originally started studying trigonometric series and decided that in order to answer the questions he had to first improve what we understand about sets jstor.org/stable/41133951
@bumblebee no problem, just throwing ideas out
 
I want to start formulating some questions now that I have a lot of topics to choose from.
Honestly, your calculus of variations question basically sums it up.
 
doing a report on fourier analysis/divergent series would require a nontrivial amount of calculation
what are the restrictions on the report?
In mathematics, the moving sofa problem or sofa problem is a two-dimensional idealisation of real-life furniture-moving problems and asks for the rigid two-dimensional shape of largest area A that can be maneuvered through an L-shaped planar region with legs of unit width. The area A thus obtained is referred to as the sofa constant. The exact value of the sofa constant is an open problem. == History == The first formal publication was by the Austrian-Canadian mathematician Leo Moser in 1966, although there had been many informal mentions before that date. == Bounds == Work has been don...
 
It has to be 3000 words.
There are other things, give me some time
It has to be a specific question on a specific part of a topic.
It has to be researched using unbiased sources
It must be written so that fellow students can understand
All work must be cited
Etc
Basically how any research paper is written except capped at 3000 words.
Note that calculations do not add to the word count.
For Number theory a question could be: How to go from modular arithmetic to the AKS primarily test?
 
2:18 AM
ok noted
a bit hard to find a biased source in math, I would think...
 
Agreed.
Accept when we’re working with stats
*except
 
:61176935 Oh ok.
 
@bumblebee haha ok fair
 
To me, axiom of choice seems a bit too boring of a topic compared to other topics on the big list =P Logicians and Set-theorist and Philosophers are interested in these kinds of things.
 
@Prithubiswasleftmse it can be very interesting 🧐
 
2:27 AM
@CalvinKhor I have read enough about the axiom of choice to say that I know nothing about the axiom of choice.
Maybe asaf can help with this XD
 
@Prithubiswasleftmse of course. As humans we are ignorant of so many things.
Yeah, these 300k dudes are insane
I can’t even imagine what it was like during Hilberts time.
I’ve heard that he knew every part of math
During his time
Anyways I got tuition now. Feel free to drop some more ideas if you wish.
 
:)
ordinal numbers perhaps leading to Goodstein's theorem
Fundamental Theorem of Symmetric Functions mathworld.wolfram.com/…
In mathematics, a Padé approximant is the "best" approximation of a function by a rational function of given order. Under this technique, the approximant's power series agrees with the power series of the function it is approximating. The technique was developed around 1890 by Henri Padé, but goes back to Georg Frobenius, who introduced the idea and investigated the features of rational approximations of power series. The Padé approximant often gives better approximation of the function than truncating its Taylor series, and it may still work where the Taylor series does not converge. For these...
 
 
7 hours later…
10:02 AM
@bumblebee I am not sure what you said there.
 
 
5 hours later…
2:39 PM
Idea: I suck at math and physics
 
Better idea: Prithu sucks at math and physics.
 
2:57 PM
Best idea: TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY BRATS!!!!!
Actually wait, both of you are older than me.
I humbly apolagize.
 
#elderrespect
 

« first day  last day (15 days later) »