« first day (223 days earlier)      last day (1176 days later) » 

8:15 PM
Hi Timothy, you are tending to ask questions about generic research. You are attempting to reduce it down to two simple questions which is good, but I think based on what you are asking you will not get a satisfactory answer. I also think this falls more towards Physics rather that matter modeling, but I think it should be reworked rather than transferred.
 
@TristanMaxson That is my question. I want to ask the question I have, not a question I don't have. I don't see how my question can be made clearer than it is. I think it's not worth closing. We don't want to assume definitely it can never be answered. Maybe the world is going to slowly become smarter and then it will be so easy for researchers to figure out how to answer those questions. When questions get closed that were clear, they can't be answered. Then we don't learn when somebody would have had the capability to answer them. It's also useful for research on which clear questions
actually can be answered to give them a chance to answer them and not make them unable to be answered by closing them.
 
You give a lot of unrelated information to your question. Your entire question could be summed up as "What research has been done on improving the strength of graphite/graphene based materials". Since graphene is known for strength, you can probably assume there has been some work, but you should put in more effort to ask a narrower question. Right now it is very broad and somewhat off topic for this SE.
 
@TristanMaxson I thought it was clear that my question was what was in the question box and the rest was me sharing information or giving people reason to see why giving an answer may be worth while because it might enable researchers to invest in new research. I don't know how to fix it up better.
 
I suspect that you are not too familiar with the research process, you should contact people involved in these materials and talk to them directly if you want to contribute. This forum is more for people doing active research or hobby research and asking about how to model the materials.
 
mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/questions/4350/… is my question. Go ahead and explain about the research process in an answer if you want. If you can explain how it really works and why you think researchers aren't going to invest in research based on an answer to the question and eplain it really well in a clear undertble way that does a really good job of explaining to me what I need to know and why that's
what I need to know that I can understand, maybe it will solve my problem.
 
8:40 PM
1
Q: Has it been researched whether face centered cubic carbon is stable?

TimothyAccording to this paper, carbon has a face centered cubic phase which is a metallic form. My question is: Has it been researched whether face centered cubic carbon is stable? Reasons why I'm interested in this question can be found in the edit history of this post.

 
9:21 PM
@Timothy I would really appreciate it if you do not make any new chat rooms here, again. I would like to avoid this:
7
Q: Avoiding making so many new chatrooms called "Discussion between user[A] and user [B]" which later become frozen or not very useful

user1271772The observation Some sites have hundreds of rooms with almost the same title; for example, there's an entire page of rooms on Mathematics.SE that were created from the comments on a specific question or answer: Most of these rooms end up getting frozen, because they are only relevant for a very ...

you can use the "Physical Properties of Matter" room to discuss questions about the strength of materials, and other existing rooms for other things.
 
10:07 PM
@Timothy Explaining the general research process is not something that should be on our SE, please use outside references for that. This isn't a place to request research.
 
@Timothy you seem to be quite active at academia.stackexchange.com why don't you ask about the research process over there?
 

« first day (223 days earlier)      last day (1176 days later) »