« first day (3016 days earlier)      last day (2007 days later) » 

12:00 AM
Hi chat
Hi chat
Hi chat
Hi chat
Hi chat
Hi chat
 
12:27 AM
@MatheinBoulomenos what is that?
 
Hey Ultradark!
What?
oh
that makes sense
 
@LeakyNun Let $R$ be a ring and $\alpha$ be an endomorphism of $R$, then an $\alpha$-derivation of $R$ is an additive map $\delta:R\to R$ satisfying $\delta(rs)=\alpha(r)\delta(s)+\delta(r)s$. Given such things, one can form the skew polynomial ring $R[x;\alpha,\delta]$ which is a free left $R$-module with basis $\{1,x,x^2, \dots\}$ and multiplication defined such that $xr=\alpha(r)x+\delta(r)$ for $r \in R$
 
but I don't see how you got from the third step to the fourth step
 
one can show that if $R$ is left Noetherian and $\alpha$ is an automorphism, then $R[x;\alpha,\delta]$ is left Noetherian (and analogously for right Noetherian)
if you take $\alpha=\mathrm{id}_R$ and $\delta=0$, you recover the usual Hilbert basis theorem
 
that's convenient
Regression Equation

Virus Growth = 29.625 - 4.958 Time_12 + 4.958 Time_18 + 0.625 Culture Medium_1
- 0.625 Culture Medium_2 - 1.958 Time*Culture Medium_12 1
+ 1.958 Time*Culture Medium_12 2 + 1.958 Time*Culture Medium_18 1
- 1.958 Time*Culture Medium_18 2
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
2.26016 87.13% 85.20% 81.46%
 
12:42 AM
Please don't spam the room like this.
hi @CaptainAmerica
 
School is a nightmare I can't wake up from.
Oh hai Ted.
 
Most students think I'm their worst nightmare, @CaptainAmerica, so think very carefully.
 
Comments on the maximal combination of the two factors:
The maximal combination is being defined as the combination of the culture medium and time duration which yields the highest number of viruses grown, within the given parameters of time duration and culture medium. When the culture medium varies from approximately 1 – 1.2 and the time duration hits 17.5, this yields the most viruses grown. This number is about 36 or greater, according to the contour plot.
I just am not sure
if the R squared value is correct?
 
@TedShifrin At least it would be a fun nightmare ;-;
 
So you think now, @CaptainAmerica. So why is school being nightmarish?
 
12:46 AM
@TedShifrin There are too many deadlines. I never have time to do any math, I just want to take a break and do something else. It's actually giving me anxiety.
 
No point getting anxious. Just make a schedule to follow and be organized.
 
I can try.
 
That is a skill that will serve you well for a long while.
If anxiety is getting truly serious, talk to your parents or to your counselor at school.
 
I have talked to my parents about it a bit. I just get worried they'll say it's my fault for doing so many extracurriculars - which I guess it is. Robotics is one of the only ways I get a mental break.
 
Well, budget your time wisely and so that you still get to do some stuff that gives you pleasure, but cut back if you have to.
 
12:51 AM
I am. Next year I'm legit only taking like 5 classes. I'm SO done.
 
Word to the wise: This sort of problem will not get easier as you proceed in life :P
 
The actual question is this: Consider the power series $\displaystyle f(z)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty z^{n!}$.
a) Show that the function $f$ is analytic on the open unit disk $\{z\in\mathbb{C}:|z|<1\}$
b) Show that, whenever $\lambda$ is a root of unity, we have
$\lim_{r\to 1^-}|f(\lambda r)|=\infty$.
I asked this question this afternoon for part (b) and was given the following answer by @MikeMiller
Consider the sequence $r_n = (1/2)^{1/n!}$. Then $\sum_{k=0}^n r_n^{k!}$ is bounded below by $\sum_{k=0}^n r_n^{n!}$, since $r_n < 1$ and $n! > k!$. Now $r_n^{n!} = 1/2$, so $$\sum_{k=0}^n r_n^{k!} \geq n/2$$
In particular, if we write $S(r)$ to be the sum $\sum_{k=0}^\infty r^{k!}$, this says $S(r_n) \geq n/2$
Therefore $S(r) \to \infty$ as $r \to 1$ - the function $S$ is monotonic and we've exhibited an unbounded increasing subset
 
@TedShifrin I guess it's better I learn now. I'm going to make a real, true schedule tomorrow and try my hardest to stick to it.
 
Cool, @CaptainAmerica. I'm doing my best to give good advice :)
 
My doubt only doubt here is that we have not shown this for all every $r \rightarrow 1^-$. Is the above(i.e. what Mike gave me) sufficient? I don't think so.
 
12:56 AM
Well, you typed that $S(r)$ was a monotonic function of $r$. Do you understand that?
 
@TedShifrin Lol, you have. I've been getting straight A's in calc since you gave me that talk about reading stuff carefully.
 
Well, that is satisfying, isn't it? :)
 
To be clear, I typed that.
 
LOL, @MikeM. Oh.
So I guess the answer to my question might be No. :P
 
Not a fan of "Is X sufficient? I don't think so."
 
12:58 AM
@TedShifrin Yes, yes it is :D
 
I don't think it's meant to be a personal affront, @MikeM.
 
@TedShifrin @MikeMiller Yes. That is not a problem. My only problem is that we have approached $r \rightarrow 1$ using this one sequence. What about other ways of approaching $1$ from the left?
 
So you're ignoring what I just asked, @user330477?
 
@TedShifrin I said yes.
But not for satsifying.
 
The answer to your question is precisely the statement "$S$ is monotonic".
 
1:00 AM
If $g(r)$ is an increasing function as $r\to\infty$ and $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} f(n) = \infty$, what does that tell us?
 
Your goal should be to understand why.
 
@TedShifrin I think I know the answer to that specific isolated question.
 
@TedShifrin I think you interchanged $g$ and $f$ and $1$ and $\infty$ there.
 
And you haven't even gotten to the limit chapter of Spivak yet, @CaptainAmerica. :P
Oh, I meant $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} g(n) = \infty$.
I changed the question slightly, but I want you to understand that rephrased question.
 
@TedShifrin Ugh, I know. Every time I think I have time, it just gets sucked up. I'm going to put Spivak time into my new schedule.
I used the word "time" too many times in that post.
^ and in that one.
 
1:05 AM
@TedShifrin Is it the definition of this that you are talking about?
 
I have one particular sequence — namely the positive integers — going to $\infty$. Why does knowing that $g(n)\to\infty$ tell us that $g(x)\to\infty$ as $x\to\infty$?
 
@TedShifrin Does this not contradict the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem?
 
Huh?
 
you're better off to stop trying to prove Ted wrong and instead try to understand the concept of a monotonic function...
 
I said "increasing" because I wasn't sure "monotonic" was known.
 
1:10 AM
@TedShifrin Sorry, what I wrote was completely wrong.
@MikeMiller Being Monotonic means it suffices to consider only one such sequence? But why?
 
we are asking you to prove that.
 
I thought you might see it more easily with the way I phrased it. Hence my making that choice to change the problem slightly.
@MikeM: I was scandalized to find out that the two kids I "tutor" AP calc to on webcam are using a textbook in Seattle that's written by a high school AP teacher (NOT a college calculus text). That textbook does not even have a section on max/min word problems. WTF !!!
 
Lol, no max/min problems.
 
So, you have monotonic sequences, bitonic sequences. I wonder what's the origin of the "-tonic" part of those words. Obviously it's referring to direction, but I can't think of any words that use the same root.
 
To me that's the most important topic in all of differential calculus.
 
1:16 AM
Really? I figured you might have said limits were.
 
@Rithaniel: It comes from monotone as in music/sound.
 
Ah, okay, that's fair enough.
 
@MikeMiller you said "the function S is monotonic and we've exhibited an unbounded increasing subset." This is where I am stuck? How did you do that?
 
You really, really should be able to finish from there. I'm not going to do it for you.
 
one tone, literally, @Rithaniel.
 
1:17 AM
Your job is to show that if a monotonic function goes to infinity on some increasing subsequence (whose limit is 1), then it goes to infinity on every increasing subsequence (whose limit is 1).
If you can cite the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, I'm sure you can do this.
 
@CaptainAmerica: We make a joke of teaching limits in high school and college calculus. It's really a topic in analysis (or for Spivak-type courses).
 
That makes me think of the apparent connection between music theory and the harmonic series. Never read much into that, but I know it's there.
 
@Rithaniel: Read about harmonics (literally) in music. It all comes from basic mathematics.
 
@Rithanial You should check out Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid then.
 
There's also a wonderful book (that you can download free) on math & music by my former colleague David Benson.
 
1:21 AM
Well, maybe over Christmas break. Right now I'm in the midst of complex variables, real analysis, and topology courses.
 
Well, fine, then.
 
@TedShifrin Wow, I'm glad I'm preparing now. No wonder so many "good" students suddenly flunk when they get to college - high schools seem to give a distorted view of many subjects.
 
Did someone say the words "complex" and "analysis" in the same sentence?
 
Also, you know this book "A classical introduction to modern number theory" by Ireland and Rosen?
 
(Perhaps with other things in between)
 
1:22 AM
Yeah, I don't know it personally, but it's a classic undergrad text.
 
I'm trying to find a copy of it for a reading course next semester.
 
@MikeMiller I am really confused.
 
Ah, I've used it a bit since at the beginning of my reading course my professor told me to read a chapter from it as a quick intro to algebraic number theory @Rithaniel
 
Having limited success, as I'm looking for free copies.
 
covers eyes and ears
 
1:24 AM
Unrelated: Library genesis is quite a website
 
Best I've got is a copy from a library
 
If you don't respond, you're not an accomplice.
 
Some Springer books you can get honestly for free, I don't think Ireland and Rosen is one of them, sadly
 
Honestly, I'm debating buying it, due to the difficulty in finding a free copy.
(That I can hold onto for the whole semester)
 
Tbh more of my books at this point are either Springer deal free pdfs or pdfs that authors put up on their websites for free
 
1:29 AM
I should actually get more physical books. I have a few lower level textbooks, but, as I've gotten higher up, professors stopped requiring we have any of them. So, if I bought this, it would be my first actual textbook since introductory calculus.
 
I loved having actual books. But most of my career I didn't have other options.
 
@TedShifrin I prefer hard copies as well. I always like to sniff the new books.
 
Just try to steer clear of glue-sniffing.
 
I haven't done that since, like, 3rd grade Ted. I'm not a hooligan.
 
:eyes:
 
1:32 AM
LOL ... ponders
injects CaptainAmerica with an iota of a sense of humor :P
 
@user330477 You need to start somewhere. What does monotonic mean? What does $\lim_{r \to 1^-} f(r) = \infty$ mean?
 
@TedShifrin Body rejects it
 
Not surprised in the least.
 
@MikeMiller There exists an increasing subsequence for which the limit is zero.
 
I'M GOING TO FINISH SPIVAK - IF IT'S THE LAST THING I DO
 
1:35 AM
No yelling, @CaptainAmerica.
 
@user330477 Huh? Which of those does that mean?
 
But what if it's not the last thing you do? Will you finish it then?
 
@TedShifrin Sorry, I just got reinvigorated for a second.
@Daminark I haven't thought that far ahead.
 
@MikeMiller I am really not feeling like myself today. I am not sure what you mean?
 
@user330477 What is this sentence responding to?
It's a definition of something but I'm not sure what you're trying to define.
 
1:38 AM
@MikeMiller I don't know what definition are you talking about?
 
I don't understand what's going on here.
What I asked was "What does monotonic mean? What does the limit of $f$ being infinity mean?" And then you responded with "There exists an increasing subsequence for which the limit is zero.", which is neither of those.
In any case I think maybe you should come back to this tomorrow.
 
@Fargle !!
 
!!?
 
I can't handle factorial you.
 
@MikeMiller Can I answer those two questions?
 
1:45 AM
I think it would probably be unproductive.
But I can't stop you.
 
whispers "May" to @CaptainAmerica
 
@MikeMiller Where can I find this theorem: "if a monotonic function goes to infinity on some increasing subsequence (whose limit is 1), then it goes to infinity on every increasing subsequence (whose limit is 1)." I have an exam tomorrow, so I would like to get this done today
 
Bad move.
 
OMG, I've been trying to so hard to sound like a sophisticated human lately. I wish had paid more attention in English after all these years. It's still the worst class though.
 
The rule is that if you can't say anything nice... so I'm done.
 
1:49 AM
I wish my privileges as room owner actually included real smacking.
 
Just because you don't have power now does not mean you cannot seize it!
 
"Can" is actually still correct in an informal context. It's just that you want to favor "may" if you're wanting to be more formal.
 
@MikeMiller A function is monotonic if it's defined on a subset of the real numbers that are entirely increasing or decreasing. So I think the limit of $f$ being infinity means that it's monotonically increasing.
 
@Rithaniel: It's not a matter of formality. It's a question of meaning.
 
Sorry it's wrong.
 
1:50 AM
@CaptainAmerica16 Neither of those are correct as stated.
 
I tried.
 
"Can I answer this?" means "Do I know enough to give a (correct) answer?"
"May I?" asks for permission. Not skills.
 
No to both of those. I knew I was going to be embarrassed today.
 
Demonark: I don't have the wherewithal to smack, even if I seize.
 
We are all embarrassed every day of our lives.
 
1:52 AM
@CaptainAmerica: Your English sucked there with your answer. I think you have the right mathematical idea.
 
@TedShifrin Care to expand?
 
@MikeMiller I am a bit time-pressed today. I just want to see how to do this?
 
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. "Can" can be used to ask for permission. It's one of the two definitions.
 
"defined on a subset of the real numbers that are entirely increasing or decreasing"?? Say what?
 
Well, it might have more than two definitions, actually.
 
1:53 AM
@Rithaniel: But in this case, although I might admit you're right, there really is a question of competence.
 
Gonna google that.
 
@TedShifrin Meaning a group of real numbers that are decreasing forever or increasing forever. I guess I said it wrong.
 
But we're talking about the function. We presume the domain is an entire real interval.
 
(Three definitions, actually. "be able to," "be permitted to," and "used to indicate that something is typically the case.")
 
1:54 AM
("monotonic" is not a property of an interval)
 
@MikeMiller Ok, so how does that help?
 
(Also "to put into a cylindrical metal container for the purposes of preservation")
 
smacks @Rithaniel
 
(but that's a different word entirely, I'd say)
XD
 
So...I ate 6 sandwiches today and I feel fat.
 
1:57 AM
No comment.
 
Of course, you wouldn't. Stop judging me Shifrin!
 
@Rithaniel I think the point is that in general, "Can I do X?" can only reasonably be interpreted as asking for permission, since context dictates that you wouldn't be asking whether you have the ability to do something. But in this particular context, it does actually make sense to ask someone with more experience whether you are even able to answer a question, and thus it is more appropriate to use "May" if you're merely asking for permission
 
1 hour ago, by MatheinBoulomenos
@LeakyNun Let $R$ be a ring and $\alpha$ be an endomorphism of $R$, then an $\alpha$-derivation of $R$ is an additive map $\delta:R\to R$ satisfying $\delta(rs)=\alpha(r)\delta(s)+\delta(r)s$. Given such things, one can form the skew polynomial ring $R[x;\alpha,\delta]$ which is a free left $R$-module with basis $\{1,x,x^2, \dots\}$ and multiplication defined such that $xr=\alpha(r)x+\delta(r)$ for $r \in R$
 
@CaptainAmerica: You take me way too seriously.
I disagree, Demonark. "Can I do this problem or not? I'm really not sure."
Oh, you agreed with me by the end. Never mind.
 
@TedShifrin You should start using emoticons so I can tell when you're being sarcastic.
 
2:00 AM
I mean there's also the descriptivist's "you know what I meant" defense. I'm quite partial to that one.
 
That's fair, though given how the situation unfolded I'm no longer sure what was originally meant
 
I say "you know what I mean" all of the time. Most people don't "know what I mean".
 
@CaptainAmerica16 what do you mean?
 
Well, I meant I felt fat at first.
 
Like, for the most part I do agree, and so many times I get on people's cases, perhaps even a bit too much, for not autocorrecting mistakes that have obvious fixes
 
2:02 AM
I suppose that's fair @Daminark. Clarity should take precedence in situations where it could be interpreted in different ways.
 
Before that, I meant I wanted to try and answer a question, but I embarrassed myself.
 
But in principle I think Ted did have a point there
 
@CaptainAmerica16 you weren't supposed to answer my question lol
 
That needs to go on the starboard for posterity. (No, I'm joking.)
 
I guess I didn't know what you meant. badum tss
 
2:03 AM
By the way, @CaptainAmerica, when I said make a schedule, I didn't mean for it to include goofing off here for hours on end :P
 
B... but that's an integral part of my schedule!
 
I guess many people implicitly put that on their schedule
oh god
 
Pew pew
 
@TedShifrin Oh snap.
 
it's 3am now and I'm supposed to be up at 8
and I'm sick
 
2:04 AM
Go to sleep fam
 
so I guess I'll just get more sick
 
I've been here for 90 minutes.
 
that's 91 minutes too long
 
:0
 
More like 91 minutes too short - ayyyy
@TedShifrin All jokes aside, I'll put Math.SE chat at the bottom. School first because I'm responsible.
Starting tomorrow.
 
2:08 AM
@CaptainAmerica16 that's how it starts
 
How what starts? My life of success and responsibility?
Or a life of seclusion and incorrectly stated analysis definitions?
 
Our lives of wasting time goofing off on here start with the phrase "Tomorrow I'll stop goofing off"
 
;-;
WAIT @TedShifrin are you still here?
 
Who?
 
You said I had the right mathematical idea? So the way I phrased things was what was wrong? Could you put the correct way to say it?
Doctor who
 
2:13 AM
I think you're missing here that the way to learn isn't to just absorb what people tell you, but rather think through it.
 
@MikeMiller Oh come on, why you gotta be like that
It's going to keep me up at night.
 
Right, that's why we should work through it.
 
@MikeMiller but he has school...
 
First, what kind of things are monotonic? What should we even be talking about in this conversation?
 
(Note: I already answered this one above.)
 
2:16 AM
i guess there's a reason you stopped
 
FOget schooll
Give me a second.
I'm only 17, you guys are mean.
Fine. I guess I'll have to sort it out myself.
 
this is just as frustrating as the earlier conversation
 
I don't want to be frustrating.
I'm sick of being a math noob.
...and I'm starting to sound like Adam. I need sleep.
 
4 years older than you and still a math noob tbh. It's gonna require patience, you have to slowly work and you'll improve
 
I don't think people stop being math noobs until they're out of graduate school for a year or two, tbh.
 
2:24 AM
Most of us never stop learning ...
 
Fine, I want to be less nooby that I am now. I want to at least know basic analysis.
@TedShifrin Now you respond.
 
After you work through Spivak, you'll know a lot. But it takes time.
I did respond earlier, @CaptainAmerica.
 
slow and steady or u fall off the cliff
 
I feel angsty now.
 
Honestly, to say someone is/isn't a math noob would require us to first define "math noob."
 
2:27 AM
Math noob: "A cringy teenager who spends hours on Math.SE, but doesn't know what a monotonic function is. Also, anyone who doesn't know basic analysis. Also, someone who hasn't been out of grad school for a year or two."
 
qed
 
LOL ... from the ridiculous to the sublime.
 
I'm glad you lol'd at that Ted ;-;
 
@Ted this duke app is driving me crazy
it gets more broken every day lol
 
LOL, seriously?
 
2:35 AM
yeah it just is impossible to log in now unless i restart my computwr every time i log out
same w the app for stony
 
That's f***ed.
What if you delete browser memory/cache?
 
yeah that was working before but now it stopped working lol
 
There are minors here.
 
You should send an email to the folks who run that website. Seriously.
 
the worst is that they're intertwined, if i log out of stony i cant log into duke till i restart everything and vice versa
yeah i probably will do that
until further notice im just gonna write down what those apps need and just do it all at once later
 
2:38 AM
Well, in my day, I had to do everything with paper and typewriter. So you're still ahead.
 
Typewriter...
 
how did y'all even find out the requirements for grad programs applications in the before times
 
Pigeons brought them, that's obvi.
 
^
Only reasonable explanation
 
@Daminark r u applying anywhere that uses this shitty site
applyyourself
is the name
 
2:41 AM
I haven't quite started looking at college apps yet
Err
 
tfw college apps
 
Grad apps
 
dude u should cuz this shit's a lot
 
There were books with compiled information, and then one sent mail asking for an application (best I can remember).
 
I've always wanted to send a letter.
 
2:43 AM
Still need to ask Matt about suggestions to the list, though I'm in this Whatsapp group whose original purpose was to complain about the GRE and holy damn someone compiled this massive list of places, some of which actually have a number of seemingly good people and which went completely under my radar
 
Maybe we made long distance phone calls. I honestly don't remember.
 
that's crazy man
@Daminark did i tell u soug called me out
 
Told you to apply here?
 
@Daminark come to one of the cheap grad schools I'm going to
 
well that and about applying to UCI
 
2:44 AM
/not to UCI?
 
I just roasted my mom. She said "I want to put out fake flowers" and I said "More like busted flowers."
 
Fake flowers for your funeral, @CaptainAmerica?
 
F
 
@Daminark schlag followed suit on the UCI comment lol
 
Lmao
It's good your folk are at least confident
 
2:45 AM
im still gonna apply but i look like a joker
 
@TedShifrin I was only half listening, so most likely.
 
What's UCI, Eric?
 
irvine
Neves suggested it cuz apparently they have some good geometers and old man Schoen there rn and its a safety
and then i get emails from my other writers being like "why even apply to uci"
 
Oh. I don't think you need it.
 
ya but an extra safety dont hurt
 
2:47 AM
Although then you'd be close to me ... for food :)
 
Did someone say food?
 
idk how safe my other schools are, NU and Duke i think are the other two most safe on my app
 
Two of my old geometer friends (who're both retired) up at Irvine have invited me to come up to go out for Chinese dinner. I need to schedule that when my life calms down.
 
ooooh i want chinese dinner
 
As do I. Haven't eaten in 3 hours.
 
2:49 AM
ROFL
CaptainAmerica is at that rapidly-growing stage.
I'm at the getting-fat stage.
 
im rapidly growing
horizontally
 
LOL ... I just bought some shirts today. I don't quite fit in the new "slim fit" cuts ... not remotely.
 
Lol, I wear a small.
/medium
That's not funny though.
 
Not for long, @CaptainAmerica :D
What's not funny?
 
Oh, I didn't want to be mean about your "slim fits"
 
2:51 AM
It's crazy. 7/8 of the shirts in one of the department stores were "slim fit." Excuse me! Most of the world isn't slim.
Maybe we should be, but really ...
 
That's an unrealistic ideal.
 
It's all psychology. Buy a large slim instead of a medium regular, I suppose.
Grr.
 
Do they make xl slim?
I might need to know in a few years.
 
Probably.
 
I'll be skinny forever.
 
2:54 AM
xxxl slim xD
 
Good morning :)
 
It's 10 pm where I am.
Good evening.
 
I'm gonna cook dinner, so I'm disappearing. Happy schedule-writing, @CaptainAmerica.
 
@TedShifrin Peace on the streets Mr. Shifrin. Have seconds for me.
 
2:57 AM
LOL
BTW, you really should chill about thinking I judge you. I'm only here to encourage your learning!
 
@TedShifrin That means a lot. For real, I'm not used to someone be so patient and stuff. Don't want to be annoying or anything.
I'm done being cringy.
 
Ted uses up his judgment on me so you're in the clear for now
 
OK :)
Demonark: You have evolved a great deal in the time I've known you.
 
From imp to full-fledged demon :)
 
>:)
But really, thank you, that means a lot
 
3:00 AM
That might be about right, @Fargle.
 
@Érico just noticed your ping from before and l m a o about that email
The guy just copy pasted the whole email
I even put the actual part he was supposed to forward in quotation marks!
 
The ire of Ted, real or imagined, is a powerful thing.
 
Hi Ted. Do you know much about Anti-de Sitter spaces? I was wondering about embedding the "universal cover" in pseudo-Euclidean space. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-de_Sitter_space#Global_coordinates . Couldn't we simply replace the timelike circle (cos(t),sin(t)) (signature - -) with a helix (cos(t),sin(t),t) in signature - - 0, or a parabola (t,t^2,t^2) in signature - - + ?
 
He's a mystical man.
 
I, for one, in my time, have gone from being a snot-nosed know-it-all kid to a snot-nosed know-it-all adult.
But I do have tissues now.
 
3:03 AM
I'm an adult too. I have no tissues. I used my shirt and regretted it.
 
F
 
It's a meme, "Press F to pay respects"
 
@Daminark ppl don’t read my man
 
Oh, I've seen that. I'm hip and stuff. F
I really need to finish my homework- and make a schedule. Goodbye all.
F
 
3:10 AM
Lol, "F" is more a substitute for "Rip" as opposed to something you just throw around
 
Actually, the parabola might have to be displaced from the origin.
 
I think "F" is rooted in some video game where there is a scene is at a funeral, and a prompt comes up which reads "press f to pay respects"
 
Yeah, I think some variant of Call of Duty?
 
Hello
 
Yeah, I think so.
 
3:21 AM
I am having problem with a notation.
Suppose A, B are two operators and f is some function.
If it's written (A+B)f , does it mean Af + Bf ?
 
Yes, that parabola should be (t, t^2/2 - 1, t^2/2) in signature - - +.
 
@mr_e_man Can you help me with my question?
 
@Mockingbird -- I would assume that's what it means. Addition of operators is usually defined that way.
 
mr_e_man thanks
 
4:25 AM
@ÉricoMeloSilva i go to stonybrook
 
5:13 AM
@NicholasRoberts cool, im applying
 
anyone familiar about linear algebra?
 
5:46 AM
depends on what type
 
6:19 AM
lol
anyone know how to prove T-1(E) = T(u) belongs to E ? E is a subspace of vector space V
 
6:32 AM
What does the Ricci square $R_{ab}R^{ab}$ curvature invariant correspond to, geometrically?
 
@CaptainAmerica16 you are the gerbil to my Richard Gere you know what I mean?
 
6:50 AM
Hello!
How do we get this identity for vector fields
$\int_V \nabla \times \vec{F} dv = \int_S \vec{F} \times \vec{n} ds$
Is it a form of divergence theorem?
 

« first day (3016 days earlier)      last day (2007 days later) »