« first day (2307 days earlier)      last day (2082 days later) » 

11:24 AM
Aw man
I spent like 5 mins making
[I₃]⁻
@GaurangTandon
 
 
1 hour later…
12:35 PM
@AvnishKabaj hehe ;)
 
@GaurangTandon Pls tell me something
How is Delta H=delta q at const pressure?
The part that is haunting me is delta U=q-P(delta)V
at const pressure is being usd to derive
delta H value
How would a different value in pressure affect my solution?
Am I making sense?
 
1:00 PM
@gateprep Note that H = U + pV.
ΔH represents the difference in enthalpy between state 1, and state 2, i.e. ΔH = H_2 - H_1.
 
Yes but how is that important to derive delta H
Why should I assume const pressure
 
Now, H_2 = U_2 + p_2V_2.
 
The internal energy counterpart and const volume is clear to me.
Ok @orthocresol then
 
Likewise H_1 = U_1 + p_1V_1.
 
Const pressure is not important
then
Alright then @orthocresol what next
 
1:01 PM
Look, i haven't finished typing. If you want to reach your own conclusion...
ok. Now we have ΔH = H_2 - H_1 = U_2 + p_2V_2 - U_1 - p_1V_1.
 
Yes true then
 
we can identify U_2 - U_1 = ΔU, right?
 
Yes
 
likewise V_2 - V_1 = ΔV
 
Yup then
 
1:03 PM
Now the issue is that p_2V_2 - p_1V_1 doesn't factorise into pΔV ( = p(V_2 - V_1)), unless you have p_2 = p_1 = p.
 
ok
But q is a path dependant func
 
So you cannot say that ΔH = ΔU + pΔV unless the initial pressure p_1 and the final pressure p_2 are equal.
 
So When delta U=q-P delta V
 
That is correct, but work is also a path dependent function, and here you need to use the fact that w = -pΔV, correct?
 
is that q in const voulme or const pressure?
ok
 
1:05 PM
That means you already made some assumptions about the path that is being taken.
 
Yes
So how do u justify that
 
Well, you don't need to justify it. You just need to realise that the result that you prove, i.e. ΔH = q, only holds when this assumption is true.
 
Ok now I get there is a practical justification for delta U
But not for delta H...It is mostly mathematical right?
@orthocresol
@orthocresol How does Scwatz identity work for Maxwell relations?
tbh I cant figure out anyhting of maxwell and the four parent equations related to that
 
Enthalpy is a mathematical construction, but exactly because ΔH = q (under certain conditions), it makes it much easier to measure ΔH than to measure ΔU. So I would hesitate to say that there is no "practical justification".
 
yes but U is more trivial practically without the use of mathematics
 
1:11 PM
I don't know what you mean by that.
I'm also unaware of a Scwatz identity, I'm afraid.
 
I mean I got you and I am pleased by your ans I didnt find any justification as clear as yours. Btw when do u generally remain online on this chatroom so that I can
get
 
It's tough to say, I come and go at odd times of the day and it generally depends on what I'm doing in real life. What I'd say is to just post your question, if anybody is able and willing to help then they will.
 
Alright any mail id or facebook or any other profile that will help me to get in touch directly with u?
In case u r willing to share?
 
Sorry, but I'd rather keep that separate.
 
Can u help me about maxwell realtions in thermo
 
1:15 PM
What about them?
 
I would be happy if u forward some genuine link
It seems Hebrew to me..
I have tried again and again
I mean I dont understand anything of it...
 
I learnt my thermodynamics primarily from Levine's Physical Chemistry. I think part of the issue is that if you really want to understand thermo, multivariable calculus is a prerequisite.
 
Ok but I don't find a good book for the same...
Gaskel is good but too much in detail
Can u suggest a book for multivariable calculus?
 
Levine has an introductory chapter on it which gives you enough info to apply it to the thermo. I liked that book partly because of that.
 
Ok would u mind if I would tag u in the chat in case I would want an answer directly from u?
 
1:21 PM
You probably don't need to, if you post something I'll usually see it if/when I pop in.
 
Alright I will do that then
 
 
2 hours later…
2:55 PM
@paracetamol Yep! Most everybody in my classes did, actually.
Pretty sure I was one of the few to learn to program on theirs, though.
 
@paracetamol What about Kerala are u all safe now?
2
 
3:19 PM
@orthocresol
I am stuck up with the topic why we need to draw common tangents for delta G curves
What is the significance of common tangents
 
@hBy2Py Phew For a moment I was afraid I fell too far behind the times ;-P
@gateprep Yep. Thanks for concern O:)
The flood-water's receding \o/
 
@paracetamol
I am stuck up with the topic why we need to draw common tangents for delta G curves
What is the significance of common tangents
I am happy that things are improving
 
@gateprep Ouch, that's not a part of my "expertise", sorry >_< (If I had been on earlier, I'd probably have helped you with the enthalpy-at-constant-pressure thingy) :3
 
Alright not an issue..
 
Looks like you'll have to await ortho's divine intervention (again) O:)
@hBy2Py Ah yes, I don't think I've told you,
Kerala () is a state on the southwestern, Malabar Coast of India. It was formed on 1 November 1956 following the States Reorganisation Act by combining Malayalam-speaking regions. Spread over 38,863 km2 (15,005 sq mi), it is bordered by Karnataka to the north and northeast, Tamil Nadu to the east and south, and the Lakshadweep Sea to the west. With 33,387,677 inhabitants as per the 2011 Census, Kerala is the thirteenth-largest Indian state by population. It is divided into 14 districts with the capital being Thiruvananthapuram. Malayalam is the most widely spoken language and is also the official...
^ I'm from here O:)
No biggie Jan was the first person to know ;-P
 
3:27 PM
Yes @paracetamol u told me
LOL
 
common tangents are important because otherwise you violate thermodynamic stability
 
@paracetamol is the malabari paratha from Kerala or Karnataka
 
3:55 PM
@AvnishKabaj I think I have put you out of your misery of choosing ;) (At least for now)
 
4:12 PM
@Martin-マーチン waaa
The answer's been deleted
Thanks
 
@gateprep Yep O:)
@AvnishKabaj I don't know ._.
 
Well... that was not my intention with the comment... but I guess that was the result anyway
 
@paracetamol you're no true keralite
 
0
A: Why does the hydrogen atom in HCl (when dissociated in water) bond to the oxygen rather than staying with the chlorine atom?

Dr OChemI’m going to answer to the posted question without reading all of the commentary. First, the answer should NOT be given in terms of electronegativity. I cannot go into detail here, but the failure of electronegativity theory to predict or explain that HI is a strong acid must not be ignored. ...

Another day, another crackpot.
4
 
I didn't try to read all of that.
 
4:23 PM
> We know that HF is tetrahedral
I can't even...
 
@Martin-マーチン i assumed it was referring to electron domains in F, but...
 
yeah... that might be meant that way, but then it's wrong, too
 
 
2 hours later…
6:21 PM
What is i(suffix) cod and E(suffix) cod in corrosion?
@a-cyclohexane-molecule
@a-cyclohexane-molecule Why are u saying so that not drawing common tangent will violate thermodynamic stability?
 
@gateprep without drawing common tangents, your gibbs function is not convex. the common-tangent construction produces the convex envelope of the gibbs function, which is required for thermodynamic stability
 
WHat does common tangent ensure..Does it ensure a common minima by any chance
What is its utility@a-cyclohexane-molecule
 
@gateprep as i've repeated multiple times now, it ensures thermodynamic stability
@gateprep no
 
Why on earth do we draw common tangents in a graph
forget about thermo@a-cyclohexane-molecule
 
@gateprep to produce the convex (concave) envelope of a function
 
6:30 PM
Alright@a-cyclohexane-molecule
 

« first day (2307 days earlier)      last day (2082 days later) »