@b3m2a1 It says, "Context: PacletName". Looks like PacletName was not substituted. It would also be good to list the SystemIDs under compatibility. This is of course relevant only for packages with binary components, but it's nice e.g. to be able to see that some are compatible with the raspberry pi.
@Szabolcs Good catch. It looks like it didn't update that parameter from the template for some reason. Are the SystemIDs cooked into the Paclet expression? All that page is generated from is the PacletSite.mz
@Szabolcs I merged the changes. I think I've gotten everything, but I've been swimming in pages the past few days. I also think I've got the interface paclet working well enough to publicize: community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/1330267
But I'm still a little bit nervous
Once everything is truly settled I'll write a long Q/A discussing how to do this type of thing for oneself on SE, but Wolfram Community is much smaller, and so a better place to put out the beta paclet.
@KraZug wonderful. It looks like the pull request never went through though. Did you submit it? If so I need to do some bug fixing as usual :) Getting all these PRs and things working smoothly via the API turns out to be a fair bit of work.
If you're using the paclet you just run PublicPacletServer["SubmitPullRequest"]
No worries. I thought about merging them and maybe I'll put in a default option to "SubmitPullRequest" so it does that automatically. For now I think two lines of code is okay though.
@AmrSaleh - I was being a bit snarky, sorry. When you created your question, you didn't add any code to show what you had already tried. Also, you didn't say you needed a quad mesh, and now 3 people have spent time answering the question.