Polyglot Development

Feeds

00:10

0

120. TRANSCRIPT, 4382 bytes #16 "?63(o?23!*# #@"/*"r"{\Dv;'[af2.q]PkPPX)\('#CO"14" ^; */ #/*0|7//```"` [>.>.])[-'][(x>77*;,68*,@,1',;# l1011)(22)/ \S \7aa*+42@n;iiipsddpsdoh coding=utf8␉␉␉␉(1P''53'S^'?????!?!??!??!!!!???!?!??!!?!?!!!!!?!!!!?????!????????????????????!) (qx #>␉xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...

Chance

01:21

So, I've noticed Whirl has been a problem on a few answers lately, and I think there is an easy solution.

They typical problem seemed to be using a 1 before the incident line where whirl completes.

If you added a 1 you can just add several more 1s until the dial is pointing back at the same operation that it started in.

I want to say that the dial has 8 operations it can point to, but I don't remember for sure. In any event, it can be derived experimentally, easily enough.

Similarly, if you need to use a zero, just follow it up with enough 1s to spin the dial and put another zero to put the dial back where it started.

Feeds

03:22

0

A: Add a language to a polyglot

121. Braincopter, 4410 bytes #16 "?63(o?23!*# #@"/*"r"{\Dv;'[af2.q]PkPPX)\('#CO"14" ^; */ #/*0|7//```"` [>.>.])[-'][(x>77*;,68*,@,1',;# l1011)(22)/ \S \7aa*+42@n;iiipsddpsdoh coding=utf8␉␉␉␉(1P''53'S^'?????!?!??!??!!!!???!?!??!!?!?!!!!!?!!!!?????!????????????????????!) (qx #>␉QQxQxxxxxxxxxxx...

Wheat Wizard

04:26

@Chance You have 1s and 0s mixed up but the dial is 8 wide

I've been saving bytes by adding zeros in recent answers..

Also if anyone else thinks they should be RO just ping me. My rise to RO was a bit undemocratic.

Wheat Wizard

05:30

Where might I figure out how the smbf code works? I remember it had a little bit at the end that was important.

Cause right now its the only non-stupid language that's broken

I'm going to sleep here is my current situation so I can recover it later:

https://tio.run/##rb3bcuvKkiD2vBD@g37BorQ3SfECgndKotbiVaLEm0iRFHXZ2iAIkCBBAALA69o60X6Z6W5P2OOedkdPz7jPdMc4oiPsp3E4YhzTEY7wvM5XnB/w@YPjzALAi0SttXZ3UyJRqMrKysrKysqqShR6nDH8wx8O8EPXVXk5kFWTNgXDpPu6NBP0IJ1d0p85yYiFIxSFUBl9MJ0IimkcUwc0S0sKL/XhljbVsaBIK0GH6DCt6epA5ya0OeRMWjB4ThMMWp2a2tSkVXF/rghdmKgjKYAZJ5IyAChT0DVdMElylG4pMjfp9blXCbHd0jQdkg06L8i/TH4xaV6dTDilbwBgnM7XsoVy5lX@BF1RdUNALLxgGCrGJelFQeBfAaboCqdLajlTPd9JsRhT19X@lEe6zaEA6VhVUZIFg@KBqjNas9kbxAB9QOsC17fAKFHVacxCT8YyLdG8ptE9mRsGeVqWALYYStICsoZeQfoBbagTYZsAg1YEoU8bmsBLosSTUmlhYQqKIamKEaQlfkzPJVmm@4IMGTak8H5ARk@NrSir4CDVVykaPrz2ivD13aEAMIrgVF7…

stasoid

08:24

I don't know exactly how SMBF works, but returning the pointer to where it was before \/ code fixes the problem (it still doesn't work in \/ though):
https://tio.run/##rb3bcuvKkiD2vBD@g37BorQ3SfECgndKotbiVaLEm0iRFHXZ2iAIkCBBAALA69o60X6Z6W5P2OOedkdPz7jPdMc4oiPsp3E4YhzTEY7wvM5XnB/w@YPjzALAi0SttXZ3UyJRqMrKysrKysqqShR6nDH8wx8O8EPXVXk5kFWTNgXDpPu6NBP0IJ1d0p85yYiFIxSFUBl9MJ0IimkcUwc0S0sKL/XhljbVsaBIK0GH6DCt6epA5ya0OeRMWjB4ThMMWp2a2tSkVXF/rghdmKgjKYAZJ5IyAChT0DVdMElylG4pMjfp9blXCbHd0jQdkg06L8i/TH4xaV6dTDilbwBgnM7XsoVy5lX@BF1RdUNALLxgGCrGJelFQeBfAaboCqdLajlTPd9JsRhT19X@lEe6zaEA6VhVUZIFg@KBqjNas9kbx…

Potato44

09:20

The SMBF works by moving back from the start (which i believe is a no-op in regular BF) this allows it to enter a loop that regular brainfuck doesn't. Which is used to print the answer by reading the 3rd last character of the source code. At least that is how I think it works off the top of my head.

Wheat Wizard

15:01

@stasoid Looks like the original didn't work anyway. There is some undocumented behavior in the interpreter.

SnoringFrog

@Potato44 That's pretty much it.

Chance

20:23

@WheatWizard I documented the bit at the end with SMBF in the asm answer

Wheat Wizard

I was talking about V documentation

V works when you remove all the "noops" but not when they are present

Chance

weird

Wheat Wizard

yeah it might be a bug

I don't really know how to debug it though

Chance

22:33

I might have 122, but I suspect Moorhens may prevent the answer.

https://tio.run/##rb3bcuvKkiD2vBD@g37BorQ3SfECgndKotbiVaJEkRSvoi5bGwQBEiQIQAB4XVsn2i8z3e0Je9zT7ujpGfeZ7hhHdIT9NA5HjGM6whGe1/mK8wM@f3CcWQB4kai11u5uSiQKVVlZWVlZWVlViUKPM4Z/@MMBfuiaKi8HsmrSpmCYdF@XZoIepLNL@jMnGbFwhKIQKqMPphNBMY1j6oBmaUnhpT7c0qY6FhRpJegQHaY1XR3o3IQ2h5xJCwbPaYJBq1NTm5q0Ku7PFaELE3UkBTDjRFIGAGUKuqYLJkmO0i1F5ia9PvcqIbZbmqZDskHnBfmXyS8mzauTCaf0DQCM0/lqtlDOvMqfoK9V3RAQCy8YhopxSXpREPhXgCn6mtMltZypnO@kWIyp6Wp/yiPd5lCAdKyqKMmCQfFA1Rmt2ewNYoA@oHWB61tglKjqNGahJ2OZlmhe0@iezA2DPC1LAFsMJWkBWUOvIP2ANtSJsE2AQSuC0KcNTeAlUeJJqbSwMAXFkFTFCNISP6bnkizTfUGGDBtSeD8go6fGVpRVcJDqqxQNH157Rfj67lAAGEVwKi9…

can someone test, and maybe suggest a Moorhens fix if possible?

Chance

23:40

actually, did the last answer work in moorhens? the Moorhens Semi-Tokenizer seems to indicate that Doxe got tokenized in the last answer, which I think would make the output 62

in any event, it seems like I can just drop a no to fix.

https://tio.run/##rb3bcuvKkiD2vBD@g37BorQ3SfECgndKotbiVaJEkRSvoi5bGwQBEiQIQAB4XVsn2i8z3e0Je9zT7ujpGfeZ7hhHdIT9NA5HjGM6whGe1/mK8wM@f3CcWQB4kai11u5uSiQKVVlZWVlZWVlViUKPM4Z/@MMBfuiaKi8HsmrSpmCYdF@XZoIepLNL@jMnGbFwhKIQKqMPphNBMY1j6oBmaUnhpT7c0qY6FhRpJegQHaY1XR3o3IQ2h5xJCwbPaYJBq1NTm5q0Ku7PFaELE3UkBTDjRFIGAGUKuqYLJkmO0i1F5ia9PvcqIbZbmqZDskHnBfmXyS8mzauTCaf0DQCM0/lqtlDOvMqfoK9V3RAQCy8YhopxSXpREPhXgCn6mtMltZypnO@kWIyp6Wp/yiPd5lCAdKyqKMmCQfFA1Rmt2ewNYoA@oHWB61tglKjqNGahJ2OZlmhe0@iezA2DPC1LAFsMJWkBWUOvIP2ANtSJsE2AQSuC0KcNTeAlUeJJqbSwMAXFkFTFCNISP6bnkizTfUGGDBtSeD8go6fGVpRVcJDqqxQNH157Rfj67lAAGEVwKi9…

can someone run this through the paces. I'll start a write up.

Transcript for

Polyglot Development