« first day (446 days earlier)      last day (4732 days later) » 

00:11
@Ninefingers Whoah, cool. A chat not associated with any SE site, just the network.
 
2 hours later…
02:22
Shog9 on March 05, 2012

If you’ve been around Meta Stack Overflow the past few days, you’ve seen a fair bit of conversation sparked by the recent changes to how reputation is calculated:

To be clear: reputation values are not changing, every action in the system is still worth the same amount. Here’s what will be different:

Your reputation will be correct at all times

Deletions will have a much more immediate effect on reputation, not waiting on a recalc (but reputation sync takes up to 5 minutes on a delete/undelete action; as to not block the user’s response thread, it’s offloaded to a background queue) …

 
2 hours later…
04:32
anyone still online?
@ThomasWard yo
was wondering whether you know anything about linux rootkits and can confirm whether this is a security problem in a kernel on a launchpad ppa: paste.ubuntu.com/870943
if so, i have to inform the Ubuntu Security Team, and the Launchpad admins
@ThomasWard Interesting. But I don't know much from a practical standpoint about rootkits
04:47
yeah, well i've already filed the security bug against the relevant package, and team, so...
shrugs
there's a reason i got the nickname "Evil Phoenix" on IRC by the Ubuntu peoples...
(1) I can be extraordinarily evil about bugs and what not, to the point of insane
(2) I constantly show up even after the bug is closed, because i find new bugs
@ThomasWard Thanks! Though I wonder what "evil" means in this context :)
insanely annoying and persistent to the point of insane without violating the ubuntu code of conduct
@ThomasWard Link?
to?
the bug?
the bug report
04:54
its private because its flagged as a security bug
ahh - thanks
if it was visible, i'd give you the link, but its a security bug so...
 
9 hours later…
13:32
@Ninefingers hadn't seen that. Cool - although full of ranting, it seems :-)
@RoryAlsop It's not so bad :)
14:25
Morn'
14:40
@Iszi A'noon
@RoryAlsop I thought we'd discussed the whole GMT-5 thing.
Aye - and I'd come to the conclusion that everyone else was wrong |:-)
15:03
@RoryAlsop Nice unibrow northman.
@ScottPack :-)
15:27
can anyone make sense of this? If not, feel free to vote to close - if I see a couple of votes I'll kill it.
0
Q: When in the keys switching happens in RSA-rc4

ZoZo123Assuming I want to surf securely on gmail, and I use SSL. the RSA is RC4 and using key of 128 bits, my question is how can I make the my browser and google to generate a new key and when does it happen naturally ?

15:37
Alex Miller on March 06, 2012

With the recent “REP-OCALYPSE” that happened over the weekend, we thought it was a great time to do another podcast – so come join Joel, Jarrod, and Josh as they talk about some of the recent changes to the site and the motivations behind them.

JOEL: This is not necessarily a podcast, but it might turn into something useable, perhaps in the form of a podcast, maybe. The goal is to talk about all of the questions that are getting closed, aka REP-OCALYPSE NOW.

Part One: there has been closing and deletion of very popular old questions going on lately. Are we happy with how this is going? What are the other options? …

 
1 hour later…
16:38
@RoryAlsop I think I sort-of understand what's being asked, but I'm not totally sure.
Does it ever bother any of you when you can actually make some sort of sense out of a post of that? Kinda makes you wonder what might be wrong with you?
@Iszi heh.
various levels of eh? - is he asking how to force a key renegotiation? If so, why? And what does he mean by RSA-RC4?
Perhaps we should just say - close the browser and reopen it: job (probably) done
@RoryAlsop I think forcing the key renegotiation is exactly what he's asking for, but the whole RSA-RC4 thing throws it off a good bit.
 
2 hours later…
19:06
Is there an RFC or proposal that limits which CAs a website will use (in effect protecting me from a DigiNotar) I've seen it on this site, but can't find it.
19:18
Hell yea! Got Security.SE free swag in the mail today! Awesome tshirt :)
19:40
Hmmm seems like the answer is: DANE for TLS: tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-protocol-17
@Iszi I am hopefully going to SANS. Don't know which event yet or which course
20:07
heh
the center cannot hold!
OMIGOD THAT IS SO COOL!
just had to see if it works...
4435
A: RegEx match open tags except XHTML self-contained tags

bobinceYou can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool th...

of course, the classic.
that is the highest voted post on SO, isnt it?
@Karrax Excellent
@AviD yes
@Karrax oo, my turn, MY TURN!!
20:31
@AviD Drat. I missed something?
@Iszi It was sort of like the top scoring Tony the Pony Zalgo post I linked to up there, only in chat
@RoryAlsop Wow... WTF?
I love that answer
and some of the comments on it
If it weren't CW, that'd be worth a metric crap-ton in rep.
@Iszi ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ กิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิ ก้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ กิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิ ก้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ กิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิ ก้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ กิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิ ก้้้้้้้้
20:49
@AviD wtf ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ กิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิ ก้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ กิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิ ก้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ กิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิ ก้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ก็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ กิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิิ ก้้้้้้้้
try parsing that with regex.
There's a pixel dying on my monitor, and it's annoying the hell out of me. CPR is only carrying it so long now.
@Iszi That's what happens. Zalgo. He COMES!
@RoryAlsop the angles are not real
21:06
Robert Cartaino on March 06, 2012

I wanted to give you a quick look at the new Stack Exchange Beta theme. Yes, we are retiring the familiar “Sketchy” theme and rolling out a more-polished and finished design for the beta sites.

Raise the curtain, cue the trumpet fanfare…

Alas, poor Sketchy…

Over the course of the next few weeks, we will be rolling out the new Stack Exchange Beta theme to all the sites still in beta.

At first glance, the new beta theme looks like an unembellished version of any graduated site: Finished, but without any particular “beta” theme, per se. But that’s sort of the point. …

21:18
Just ran across this hysterical old post - re snappy answers to stupid programmer interview question: exold.com/article/stupid-interview-questions
@AviD I like it
Im thinking I will start asking that stupid question - just to see if I get great answers like that. You try coding a copy function without asking those questions? NO HIRE!
21:35
@AviD I like it!
22:34
Hello people
Hiyo
Got the SWAG today
Apparently mailed a fortnight ago
Not that good a performance for a Massachussets -> Québec journey

« first day (446 days earlier)      last day (4732 days later) »