« first day (2 days earlier)      last day (30 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 23:00

12:02 AM
@ArtOfCode *couple of years
 
Assuming by "here" you mean Europe.
 
JK
 
@Randal'Thor row faster, dammit!
 
@Shog9 There's already a row between the High Court and the government.
 
12:08 AM
I expect videos of wig-slapping
 
No, that was the last PM ... oh, wait, you said "wig".
 
Kaz
12:30 AM
this was a really good article.
 
Kaz
12:55 AM
 
1:09 AM
@Kaz y'know... This touches on something that's been bugging me all day.
After coming across this "tweet storm"
I'm from the rural midwest. All of this talk about coastal elites needing to understand more of America has it backwards.
(or whatever the kids call those things where you just reply to yourself until you manage to get an entire thought out on Twitter)
To be fair, the guy who wrote it is, from the sound of it, coming from a fairly well-off bit of whatever rural midwest he's from.
So I think he's probably being honest in his observations
But...
I had to work for a long, long time just to be able to move from one town full of failing industries to another town full of failing industries
And, yeah, he's quite right - totally broadened my horizons. Met folks who were very different from the folks I'd known. Different races, religions, etc. All that good stuff.
But... The practical difference was that now I lived among folks who were dealing crack and addicted to meth instead of just drunk.
Went to a Baptist church instead of Lutheran.
Lamented the decline of the steel mill instead of the boot factory.
Ignoring superficial things like skin color, they were the same people. Dead-end jobs / no jobs, old folks living on meager pensions that the young folks never even had a chance at, a dwindling population of union loyalists watching their local fight half-heartedly for jobs that were leaving and never coming back.
Folks who voted Democrat did so 'cause that's what they'd always done; folks who voted Republican did the same. Neither really expected anything to change.
And then I actually visited the coast, visited San Francisco and San Diego and New York. Beautiful buildings, busy people, unbelievably high prices.
To this day, I have no idea how people actually manage to live there.
 
@Shog9 Very long box.
 
Ssssh! Shog is reminiscing :)
 
whispers: keep going! we like it
 
;-P
I'm sure there's a trick to it. You give up stuff that you don't need, stuff you never really thought of as luxuries: car, pet, furniture, personal space... And in return, you get a slightly higher wage which you put toward the insane cost of housing that would make the crackheads next door in my small town think twice.
And maybe, just maybe, if you get really good at cutting your life down to the absolute bare essentials, you earn enough slack to afford some of the dazzling forms of entertainment that only a large city has to offer.
I really don't know.
and that's what's been bugging me
 
1:26 AM
Where does internet factor in if this were today? @Shog9
 
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC the net makes it a LOT cheaper to meet folks who are unlike yourself.
But... You gotta want to do that
 
@Shog9 Like me. Like us. That's the most thoughtful message of the week - maybe the month.
The net allows you to learn things you could never learn conventionally.
 
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC oh, you could
 
@Shog9 harder, less likely
Things people would be unwilling/don't care to teach.
The internet is a huge secret santa event.
 
I mean, I know folks who hit the road in college and visited cities throughout the country, and in other countries... Slept on park benches or hostels, met folks in seedy bars, really did broaden their horizons.
 
1:30 AM
^
 
Wasn't, uh, entirely safe
And still wasn't cheap
Definitely not something you'd do if you were a responsible adult with folks who depended on you not ending up in a hospital somewhere
 
The fact that I get to speak with a prominent employee of the world's 15th most visited website is widening. And you can be normal, and talk to regular people.
 
Or you can open up your browser, open up IRC, find a group of folks with different backgrounds and... just talk to them.
right
 
TNB is very diverse - people living in turkey, indonesia, some military, very diverse
The internet is what we make of it - and we made it an open, welcoming place.
(except for 4chan and "those" sites)
Internet has renegades everywhere.
 
@Shog9 Time was that all new apartments in NYC in buildings with more than 6 units were automatically subject to some form of rent control to help keep the prices reasonable. However, it became optional in the 70s. I have relatives and friends who are only able to live in NYC because they have a rent stabilized apartment, but they are hard to get one's hands on and becoming an increasing scarcity.
 
1:34 AM
I have a +200 meta post that represents my view on the internet. I contribute back, and my opinions are heard.
The internet doesn't care who or what you are. It cares about what you have to say.
 
There were also some parts of NYC where property became much more affordable for brief peroids of time (eg Rockaway right after Hurricane Sandy)
 
If you can be nice to people, people will give to you and you will give to others without realizing it.
@1000000000 :P
@Shog9
 
it can at least
 
@Shog9 at least what?
 
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC sorry. The internet can work that way - listen to what you have to say, share what others know, without making you prove your membership in the right tribe first. Doesn't always though.
At its best, it's still built on people. Nasty, selfish, beasts that we are.
 
1:37 AM
@Shog9 If you go on the right sites and be the right person and be respectful. Most of all, learn.
The internet allows enjoyable networking, prevents your life from being an echo chamber.
 
When it works, it works because folks try hard to make it work. Allow for each others' failings, work to understand them, spend more time listening than talking.
3
But... You can still get that echo chamber if you want it.
 
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC A lot of people use the Internet to make an echo chamber
 
If you reflect and introspect you can stop it.
 
If I just want an echo chamber, I just talk to myself
 
1:39 AM
:P
@Shog9 SE is perfect because it allows people to govern themselves. The switzerland of sites. Even the tiniest suggestion or problem is rendered as a meta post.
 
I find that people are less likely to bother me with their opinions if I am in the middle of a conversation with myself
 
The internet is broken free of traditional social norms. Often because it is a mixing of cultures.
Twitter, SE, Reddit - these sites; people care about your ideas, not who you are
@Shog9
 
@1000000000 Yeah... I think this is something that gets really hard to wrap your head around if you're not familiar with it; NYC is really, really dense. Like, a wealthy town in Colorado, there'll be a trailer park outside town where the folks who run the restaurants and stuff live. So you come from that & assume that there must be a place "away" from where everything happens where the people live. And, there are. But space sorta distorts around the means of transportation.
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC that's the goal at least. Hopefully we do achieve it sometimes.
 
I have many subconscious biases - unintended racism, sexism, stereotypes. The internet frees me of that by censoring that information.
 
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC it can do better even: by showing you that the stereotypes don't necessarily align with reality, it can free you from the weight of those assumptions completely.
 
Kaz
1:47 AM
Checked my facebook for the first time in months today. Echo chamber as far as the eye can see. It's disappointing.
 
But... For that to work, you do have to be open to learning something about the folks you're interacting with.
 
@Shog9 I often consciously know they don't align with reality, but they continue.
I dislike face photo avatars for a reason. It prevents me from learning the person before the exterior.
I'm 100% open to learning things about folks if I have gotten to know who they are first
 
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC which creates sort of a balancing act for the software design: you don't want to force folks to expose their personal details if they don't want to (screw you, real-name policies), and you don't want to rub personal details in folks' faces when they're not ready for it (big-ass author bios at the top of a post anyone?) - but you do want to create a pathway for those things if possible.
 
Kaz
I had the same running up to the election Once I had my bubble burst (about 3 months before the election) it became painfully obvious that everywhere I go to for news. And entertainment. And insight. All completely biased.
 
@Shog9 Yeah, trying to figure out the whole system of renting and property in NYC, while at the same time making sure you had a stable job there, and the million other things you need to worry about while moving would make for virtually insurmountable barrier. I know very few people who live in New York who did not come to New York when it was a shit hole.
 
1:50 AM
@Shog9 My only reaction is total agreement.
 
Heck the renting system is so potentially exploitative that the city puts ads in the subways reminding tenants of their rights.
 
I mean, imagine I'm horribly prejudiced against Dutch people. I assume they're all lazy hot-heads who can't write. Then I visit Cerbrus's profile and am shamed and enlightened.
2
That's... A thing you'd want to happen.
You can't really make it happen
But you can perhaps design the software to not prevent it from happening
 
Kaz
@1000000000 Sounds a lot like London. The salary you'd need to get a mortgage for the average house in the cheapest London borough is something like £100,000 per year.
 
If you ask, say, a person living in X about some random statistic Y, you learn Y, they learn what "foreigners" are curious about.
Slightly unrelated: The internet gives people new ways to communicate; starring, careting, faces, etc.
 
:)
 
1:55 AM
@Shog9 I even have prejudice against my own race.
 
Not that it tells you whether I'm happy or just trying to appease you out of a misplaced sense of social responsibility and irrepressible desire to fit in, but... it's a start :P
 
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC I don't know what your race is, but I'm sure you have plenty of company. Use that to empathize, but don't let it get the better of you.
 
@Kaz There are still some parts of NYC that are somewhat affordable but they are very far flung and its difficult to commute to the center of the city from them.
 
@ArtOfCode Ah, the information expressible by two characters.
@Shog9 Indeed. I am learning to get rid of all prejudices.
 
Also NYC does have rent control/stabilization which unless I'm mistaken London does not have
 
1:57 AM
If you looked deep enough, I believe you would have a tiny stereotype or prejudice against $(random.select(races)).
@Shog9
 
But its slowly dying out as new apartments are created without rent control and old apartments leave the rent control system
 
Kaz
@1000000000 Nope.
 
However, on the other hand, the UK has more reasonable squatting/trespassing laws
 
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC Funny enough, traits I was most prejudiced against when I was younger didn't really budge when I found myself living and working along side people who exhibited them. It's easy to see the worst in folks when you're primed to do so, and... So I did. It wasn't until I found myself talking to folks online, and realized where they were coming from that I could see my own failings.
 
Sadly rent control seems to become one of those FDR era policies meant to help reduce income inequality that politicians managed to convince people we were better without
 
2:06 AM
I believe that 99% of my prejudices are completely irrational, but I just can't get rid of them
@shog9
It is nice how two random people across the world can meet by chance and have such a meaningful discussion. @Shog9
(very random but): canada flag = peru flag + maple leaf
Chilean flag is just a really lazy american one. It looks nice though.
 
2:28 AM
@noɥʇʎPʎzɐɹC Cheers, brother. I'm gonna go drink a lot of whisky now ;-)
 
Kaz
3:04 AM
#FlagCeption
 
 
2 hours later…
5:19 AM
ye
hey guys
wassup
nothing...
apparently
 
wat
the sky
 
hey
yes
correct answer
I guess
unless u r in ur house
which u should be
then it would be the ceiling
 
wat
ok
 
 
4 hours later…
Mew
9:43 AM
Sup
 
10:14 AM
@TRiG
in The Water Cooler, 2 hours ago, by Raoul Mensink
@TRiG after takeing the time to read through the broken english. Care to explain how this makes him anything else than an American in the eyes of an "European"?
 
@RaoulMensink Why the scare quotes?
 
why not?
 
11:05 AM
@RichardU Meh, not a far comparison to be honest... the difference is that Trump himself was trying to say the election results might not be valid if he lost. Hilary is not encouraging her 'fans' to doubt the election results.
It's not a case of people "refusing to accept the results of the election" because they think they are invalid, they are refusing to accept them because they do not like the president-elect
There's a huge difference between a (potential) leader trying to sow seeds of doubt in the democratic process and people not liking the new president.
 
Kaz
@DanPantry I think @RichardU is referring more to things like this.
I'm with Richard on this one. Attacking Trump because he might challenge the results of the election, and then turning around when he wins and calling for exactly the thing they were attacking him for is the height of hypocrisy.
Not to mention what that would do to the democratic process.
If through some means Trump isn't the new president come January, there really will be blood in the streets
 
Mew
11:33 AM
Hi
 
@Kaz Oh, yeah, that's dumb.
 
Mew
interesting petition
So Trump might not be president?
 
Kaz
@Mew In theory, yes. In reality? You'd need 20-30 people to defy the democratic will of their states. The only time that's ever happened (over a century ago), it was because the candidate had died the day before.
 
@Mew The System allows for it, however if they do there will be blood. Also the reason the electors do not refuse Trump, even though they are ment to do so when they are of the opinion an dictator might rise.
 
Mew
@Kaz, I heard alot of Trump's own party don't like him
perhaps this could happen
Will hilary remain in politics now in opposition like they do in Australia or is she out of politics?
 
Kaz
11:41 AM
@Mew Can you really imagine these people, who've been picked and thoroughly vetted precisely for their ability to follow the constitutional process and democratic will, doing that?
 
@Mew I don't know how the politics in Australia works, but she is still there.
 
Mew
@RaoulMensink, how is she still there, she was voted out?
OR does she have a local electorate too where she was voted in?
IN Australia each politiican represents an electorate, even the Prime Minsiter is a representative of a particular electorate
 
@Mew The democrats didnt disappear. I dont know what Position she does get, but she is still a politician.
 
Kaz
I imagine she'll be active in politics until the day she dies.
 
Mew
So IN Australia, as long as the opposing PM Candidate wins their electorate they will stay in parliament
what about Obama?
 
Kaz
11:47 AM
But probably not is any kind of official political position.
 
Mew
Is Obama allowed to stay in politics?
 
Kaz
@Mew Allowed? Sure.
Would he? Probably not.
 
Mew
HE is or is he quiting
oh k
 
He is still in politics just not at that Level.
 
Kaz
Generally speaking, Presidents stay out of public politics once they leave office.
 
Mew
11:48 AM
thanks for the info
Why does this petetion exist? change.org/p/…
Clearly they can get 50M signitures
 
@Mew because thats the system
 
Mew
I mean what's the point of a petition
we already know that 50m + peeps want hilary
so anything less than 50m signitures is just telling us what we already know
 
@mew the college of electors have the right to cast their vote differently.
 
Mew
Yes but a petition isn't going to change their vbote
Because the election already was such a petition
Sure, they may change their vote because of the "popular vote" results
 
if they get Support to do so they actually might
 
Mew
11:53 AM
but unless the petition exceeds the number of poople who voted hilary in the elction, the petition doesn't really provide any weight
 
Kaz
@Mew There's a huge difference between voting in a general election, and voting to *overturn* the result of a general election.
 
Mew
@RaoulMensink, I could start a counter petition urging them to ignore this petition and will probably accumulate 2m+ signutures also
so how do we know what petition is best?
We have an election
which was already done
Should petitions hold more weight than elections?
Where any non-usa fake citizen can sign
I've got like 3 accounts on that site
I'm not even from the US and I could sign that petition
seems a bit odd that it would have any weight
 
Kaz
@Mew I wouldn't take it too seriously. It's basically the equivalent of likes on facebook.
 
That Petition holds no weight, but I wouldnt be supprised if they did actually change their vote.
 
Mew
@RaoulMensink if they do support hiliary, does she have any power anyway given that both house and senate are republican?
 
11:59 AM
No, it would just cause for a standstill. Which might also be good
 
Kaz
@Mew Obama's had a republican House & Senate for 6 years. He's not exactly been powerless in that time.
 
As far as I know the Senate can't make law changes on their own.
 
Mew
@RaoulMensink what power does the president have without the support of the houses/senate?
can they make rules by themselves?
or do they need the support of the houses?
And can the houses make rules without the president's support?
 
Short of executive orders, I don't believe the president can make rules alone
but then I'm not American, so several pinches of salt there
 
Mew
@ArtOfCode and can the house/senate make laws without the president?
 
12:01 PM
@ArtOfCode but it Needs the president doesnt it?
 
I don't know the other way round, but it wouldn't make much sense to have a president if you're not going to involve them in lawmaking.
 
I think the president has to approve of it as wel, not sure though
 
Kaz
@Mew Not without a 2/3 majority.
 
Mew
ah
 
Kaz
Congress controls the laws
The president controls the government
 
Mew
12:02 PM
What's congress?
 
Kaz
@Mew The House and the Senate.
All the elected politicians
 
Mew
So what do you mean by "the president controls the government"
what is "the government" and how does he control it
do you mean the army and public servants etc?
like he is their boss?
 
@mew as kaz said all elected politicians
 
Mew
oh
but he doesn't really control them?
they can all vote however they choose
 
Kaz
@Mew The FBI, the IRS, the Pentagon, the various departments of state (Health, Education, Foreign Policy, Finance, Regulators, Prosecutors etc.)
 
Mew
12:04 PM
ok
Ok, so with presidential support, the congress needs 50% majority for laws
but without support needs 67%
 
Kaz
Basically, everyone who works "for the government" ultimately works for the president.
And they can do whatever they like (more or less).
For instance, say Trump wants the FBI to prosecute Hillary Clinton.
 
Mew
He can do that?
 
Kaz
He phones the Director of the FBI and tells him to prosecute her.
 
Mew
and the FBI director has no choice?
 
Kaz
If the director won't, Trump fires him and finds a director who will
 
Mew
12:05 PM
wow
I guess he is powerful then even without congress
 
Kaz
@Mew In a lot of areas, yes.
 
Mew
Alot different to Aus where the prime minister is merely another PM on the side of the majority
 
Do note that if he does such things, the electors wont allow him to rule for Long.
 
Mew
another MP* (minister of parliament)
@RaoulMensink, but he promised to prosecute hilary
so the public support it
 
@Mew he also said he might or might not nuke europe
 
Mew
12:08 PM
Do you think the public would be against prosecuting hiliary, even if she was guilty?
Why shouldn't she be prosecuted just because of her positiion?
 
@RaoulMensink Britain might have something to say about that. And if he wants to keep that "special relationship" with Britain that he said he does, he'll reconsider
 
@ArtOfCode Britain is not europe though ^^
 
Um, yes it is.
 
Kaz
@Mew Because it's politically divisive. Just because the President can, in theory, do whatever they like. Doesn't mean that they will, or that the public would let them.
 
Europe is a continent, Britain is part of that continent.
It's also still part of the European Union at the moment.
but it will always be part of Europe
 
Mew
12:10 PM
Brittain is part of Europe, but may soon leave the EU
Europe isn't defined by the EU political union
Just like Texas will always be part of america even if not always part of the USA
 
Kaz
@RaoulMensink He said he wouldn't rule anything out. There's a big difference.
 
@Kaz How? He didnt rule it out, so he might.
 
Mew
Yeah
those terrorists need to learn proper behaviour
or face the consequences
 
Kaz
@RaoulMensink He might. But "He might nuke Europe" is a very different sentiment from "I'm going to keep all my options open"
 
If I'm reading Wikipedia right, 39% of Europe is Russia :).
 
12:13 PM
@PaulWhite Wikipedia is an invalid source.
 
Kaz
@PaulWhite Depends entirely on your definition.
 
Yes yes I know. Hence the smiley. Thought it was interesting.
 
Kaz
IMO, when people say "Europe" they generally mean either "Western Europe (The EU minus the baltic/slavic/ex-USSR states)" or "The countries west of Russia and north of Turkey".
 
@Kaz yeah, except they're countries not states ;)
 
Kaz
@ArtOfCode Can the 2 not be used interchangeably?
 
12:18 PM
Not in Europe :P
 
Not that I think anyone is about to "nuke" anyone. Debating the definition of "Europe" would be kinda low down the list of priorities in that event.
 
Honestly Armegedon isnt the end of the world, humans are.
 
@RaoulMensink Unless we manage to build a Death Star, I think that's unlikely.
Depending on the definition of "end of the world" in use.
Not that I'm one to quibble over such things.
 
We are slowly, but surely depleting and destroying the earth. I would consider that a good Definition of "end of the world".
 
@RaoulMensink By volume? Mass? Something else? End of the world for humans, perhaps, but then saying humans are the end of the world is a little circular.
 
Mew
12:27 PM
Eventually we will build our own artificial Earth
Using the resources of the current Earth
And other planets
This will eventually lead to the dstruction of our Earth and surrounding planets
 
I would like to believe that if armegedon did happen, that the world would be able to restore itself slowly, but surely.
 
Indeed. It appears to have survived rather dramatic events in the past.
Dinosaurs, not so much.
 
We already have proof that animals can survive nuclear Radiation better than humans, so unless we first kill all live on earth I am pretty sure enough animals would survive for it to repopulate.
 
Mew
REgardless
the Earht will not last forever
The Sun won't last forever
So it's not about if there's an armigeddon, it's about when
and therefore who relaly cares when
it's inevitable
 
Well that's true, though by the time that happens, we (or whoever replaces us) might have the technology to work around that. I certainly won't be around to find out though.
 
Mew
12:30 PM
Yes
that's right, the earth' has a limited life span,
but life doesn't have to if we can leave the earth
 
Building a wormhole to a suitable orbit around a compatible star would be a high-risk high-reward plan for the Earth.
 
Mew
and solar system
lol
 
@Mew we could "refuel" the earth though
 
Or find a way to directly and safely convert arbitrary matter to energy, and vice versa. That would solve a number of issues.
Though it might be bad for the price of gold.
relocates room to Worldbuilding.se
 
Mew
Who knows
if gold can be converted into lots of energy
maybe it'll be valuable
or you mean other substances could be converted into gold easily
 
12:36 PM
Yes exactly.
 
Mew
yea
no wonder elite folks don't like science
 
Some smart person will probably pop in and say something about the problem being entropy rather than energy. But that's way over my pay grade.
 
Mew
ultimately nothing escapes the 2nd law of thermodyanmics
 
I just like the fact that 70% of all currency is digital. Which is energy in a way :P
 
Mew
except for statistical anomolies
energy is the currency of the future
 
12:39 PM
bitcoin :P
 
@Mew True, but Newton's been "wrong" before ;)
Oh I'm being stupid and confusing laws there. Never mind, lol.
 
Mew
OH yeah
these are the laws of thermodynamics
 
didnt Newton do laws of gravity that Einstein proved wrong?
 
Mew
He just refined the
Newton's law is a an approximation of Einstein's law when mass is small so it's all good
But yeah Einstein showed time slows down in a large gravitational field and this distorts stuff
 
1:22 PM
The arguments between Einstein and Bohr were quite amusing. Bohr's response to Einstein'g paraphrased "god does not shoot dice" was "stop telling god what to do"
 
2:09 PM
@Downgoat funny you should mention that (watch for about 15 seconds)
4
 
The donkeys of sheep. Very nice.
 
 
2 hours later…
4:40 PM
Now Pro-Clinton people are trying to pressure the electoral college... hurm
 
@Shog9 :)
 
SQB
4:57 PM
@RichardU not good. As much as I dislike the winner.
 
5:15 PM
On the plus side, if the electors do make someone else president, it should be the long overdue death of the electoral college.
2
 
SQB
@Dennis NPVIC?
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among several U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their respective electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The compact is designed to ensure that the candidate who wins the most popular votes is elected president, and it will come into effect only when it will guarantee that outcome. Many political analysts have concluded that the Compact is extremely unlikely to pass nationwide. As of 2016, it has been adopted by ten states...
 
@Dennis It'll never happen - you've got to make an amendment to the constitution, which requires more than an act of congress - it basically requires all of those little red states to sign on board to it - which they won't because it goes against their interests.
@SQB and that won't happen for the same reason.
 
SQB
5:32 PM
@AaronHall no, that doesn't need an amendment. That's just the Electors voting as they see fit.
 
it goes against their interests.
So they're not going to do it.
Only blue states are adopting it, trying to pressure the smaller population states into following suit. Smaller states aren't going to do it though.
I imagine if they did it, candidates will stop caring about states, and spend all their time stumping in megametropolis areas.
 
@SQB As I understand the NPVIC the electors don't vote as they see fit. The difference is that (most) electors currently have to vote based on the popular vote in their state, but NPVIC would force electors to vote based on the national popular vote.
But, yes, individual states are free to choose NPVIC without an amendment.
 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 23:00

« first day (2 days earlier)      last day (30 days later) »