« first day (1660 days earlier)      last day (2730 days later) » 

12:30 AM
My last think, thanks to @orthocresol and some search about how to make methanal
In the industry Formox process is used
What do you think @jerepierre ?
 
Sure there are tons of ways to go from an alcohol to an aldehyde. That would work.
Do you need to methylate urea from the beginning though? Perhaps urea can be reduced directly to methanol.
 
I don't know
I found somewhere this reaction
I'm not that good to make reaction drawing
 
This synthetic challenge is very unusual, and I think reducing urea (either directly or after derivitization) to methanol and then oxidation is a believeable answer.
I think the more interesting idea raised by the question is whether there is a way to replace NH2 (from a urea or from a primary amide, for example) with a hydrogen. I doubt that reaction has received much attention. I don't think it is a reaction that synthetic chemists (like myself) need very much.
 
I will edit my answer with that for the moment saying this is impossible to do E-C reaction with amide (good to know by the way)
This is really awkward to do this reaction just to make formaldehyde
 
Formally, it's a reduction. LAH is just about the most reactive reducing agent around, so that's not suitable. However, maybe someone is doing research on this type of transformation by some new catalytic method. I think that would be very interesting. And maybe very useful. I just can't think of a time I would need to do that.
 
12:39 AM
The good question like you said is is it possible to cut C-N bond to replace it by C-H. (I bet in one step in your mind?)
 
It may have been studied, but I don't know.
Good on you for trying to come up with an approach to this unusual question and improving your answer. Gotta run. Good chatting with you.
 
I will ask my last teacher of organic chemistry, he has a tremondous culture, if he gas idea.
Well I'm very curious in general of particular things
I have a good culture but unfortunately it works only in particular things haha
Also maybe protect the ketone with a diol might help ? don't know
I have a lot of idea on head. To bad that it looks to be impossible tomake ozonolysis with terminal alkene
 
Jan
The most important thing you have to remember about urea is that it is damn unreactive per se. It’s not only an amide, it’s a double amide. So that ketone is not going to do very many things.
 
I keep it in mind. Would it be possible to make E-C reaction on the urea with protected ketone or because of four heteroatoms on the C something else happends ?
 
if you can actually get to the acetal, I don't see why it wouldn't work. I'm just skeptical of whether you can actually get to the acetal. You're really insistent on Eschweiler-Clarke, eh?
 
12:50 AM
Yes I like to use methanal to synthesize itself next
:D
 
well... if you insist
lol
the thing is that if you want to put all four methyl groups on to make N,N,N',N'-tetramethylurea, you need 4 eq. of formaldehyde
and you're producing 1 eq. from the central carbon
 
But I want to propose something which will may work
@orthocresol yes I know :D that's why I wrote "awfully awkward" :P
 
so you have a net loss of 3 eq of formaldehyde lol
i guess, it could be useful if you have 13C- labelled urea or something like that..
i still think deprotonate - MeI is straightforward and pretty likely to work
 
Jan
It’s all a secret scheme to sell the synthesis to <insert evil regime of choice> hoping they will fall for it!
 
Monsanto
 
12:53 AM
Because this question is typically unusual maybe I can take in a second part of the answer all idea I had. For example use urea as catalyst if we say that ozonolysis was possible for terminal alkene
 
It's not a catalyst if it doesn't come out regenerated
 
Depend look
 
Jan did say the ozonolysis of a terminal alkene would make formaldehyde, so...
so I don't think you have an issue there
 
urea --> (Wittig with ethylene) ---> urea with C=CH2 instead of C=O then ozonolysis and you get urea again etc
 
I doubt that double enamine is going to survive.
 
Jan
12:56 AM
Urea won’t participate in a Wittig.
 
What i say is that I can tell about some idea I had and then said this is not possible
 
Idk, it's up to you.. it just feels like you're trying really hard to fit in E-C somewhere
 
To make a complete answer explaining why a lot of idea even if they looked to be great wouldn't have work
 
Which is fine, given that you have a paper on E-C alkylation of amides
So you don't need to find a workaround, if anything the N on urea is more nucleophilic than the N on a normal amide
 
Jan
However, Organic-chemistry.org suggests that Tebbe would work.
 
12:57 AM
Oh yeah! Tebbe works with amides.
 
Jan
I like Tebbe because of the metal complex it uses =D
 
Wouuuuhouuuu :P
 
Is it the one after activation with AlMe3?
Or just the Cp2TiCH2 :D
 
My favourite reactions are E-C, H-V-Z, and M-P-V reduction
 
Well, there was one time where I (for whatever reason) fell in love with the Morita-Baylis-Hillman.
 
1:00 AM
Also CH2N2 to make methylation without other product than nitrogen
 
For a month or so, I was desperate to devise some synthetic pathway involving it.
 
Haha
 
Jan
What distinguishes Morita-BH from BH?
 
Is there a difference? I don't know..
 
Jan
My PI suggested to use a Baylis-Hillman without electrophile to isomerise an enone xD
 
1:03 AM
As in cis to trans?
 
Jan
Another reaction I like is the Passerini. I’m kinda sad that using a Buchwald-Hartwig instead is so much better in my molecule =C
Yes.
Also, it’s more the binuclear Ti/Al complex.
 
I like Mitsonobu too
 
yup, that's the one :D
Never seen the Passerini before.
 
Jan
I’m trying to deduce what HVZ and MPV are o.o'
 
The Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley (MPV) reduction in organic chemistry is the reduction of ketones and aldehydes to their corresponding alcohols utilizing aluminium alkoxide catalysis in the presence of a sacrificial alcohol. The beauty of the MPV reduction lies in its high chemoselectivity, and its use of a cheap environmentally friendly metal catalyst. Figure 1, Exchange of carbonyl oxidation states in the presence of aluminium isopropoxide. The MPV reduction was discovered by Meerwein and Schmidt, and separately by Verley in 1925. They found that a mixture of aluminium ethoxide and ethanol could...
 
1:05 AM
Hell-Volhard-Zelinski and Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley
 
Jan
Aaaah, that makes sense xD
 
I hope I got those right
 
Yep
 
Jan
I thought he was Werley but obviously I was wrong …
 
Ah, Germans.
 
Jan
1:06 AM
Yeah, and by using the name Passerini I have given away that my target molecule contains an Amide O:)
 
I actually gave away my target molecules to Loong
 
Jan
Another one I like for its name is Nozaki-Hiyama-Kishi. It keeps reminding me of an anime:
 
And Yamaguchi
 
Jan
@orthocresol That’s okay. I’m sure @Loong knows everything about my lab work, too, by now.
 
Jan
1:08 AM
Damnit, why are AniDB links not inline-expanded? =C
 
I've watched a total of... 3 or something series of anime.
 
Jan
The thing is, I attempted obfuscation O:)
 
Did it not work
 
Jan
The lab work or the link expansion?
 
What is this ?
 
1:09 AM
The obfuscation
 
@Jan …
 
Jan
@orthocresol Dunno, ask him xD
I mean … many of my questions are clues, obfuscation or not. My institute is a double clue …
I was just thinking of linking my thesis as soon as it’s accepted and everything … until I realised that only the g-block elements will be able to read it. And Aaron in a few years’ time.
 
starts learning German on Duolingo
Ich bin ein junge?
 
Jan
> Ich bin eine junge Robbe.
 
@Jan why do you speak of that anidb.net/perl-bin/animedb.pl?show=anime&aid=4121 and also about chemistry and your work? I don't see the relationship
 
1:16 AM
What's that o.o
I'm not cut out for languages :D
 
Jan
@9-BBN The anime connects to the Nozaki-Hiyama-Kishi coupling by also being named NHK (ni youkoso) ;)
@orthocresol I’m a young seal ;)
 
Oh ok
Chemists joke ^^
 
Ah :D
 
Jan
(For boy, you want to capitalise the J.)
@9-BBN Like the way I keep naming iodomethane Misty Mei after a character in a hentai anime.
 
Ah... goes back to Duolingo
 
1:19 AM
@Jan which one ? (no it's OK)
 
Jan
@9-BBN Why don’t you try to find out yourself? ;p
 
Because those things are not my cup of tea too. I prefer practice than watch. It may depends on people :P
 
Jan
Fun fact: enter it on AniDB, it only gives you a single hit xD
 
wtf
 
Jan
?
 
1:24 AM
> I prefer practice than watch. It may depends on people :P
time to sleep
Goodnight \o
 
@orthocresol don't you ? HA :)
Good night !
Think about Eschweiler-Clarke in your dreams
 
Jan
What a way to say ‘I don’t like where this conversation is going’ =D
 
I'm a seal. I'm not supposed to be exposed to this sort of thing..
:<
 
Jan
Reminds me of a video including penguins I heard of …
(Also, seals reproduce, too!)
 
Need to find another seal before that happens ^^
 
Jan
1:35 AM
And with that the seal disappered before any undesired further comments were uttered.
 
Well I'll continue later to update my answer. See you soon ! :-)
 
user228700
2:24 AM
Hey everyone :-)
 
user228700
I've a quick question. I'm trying to find the solubility (in terms of molarity) of a gas dissolved in water, using Henry's law. The number of moles of water hasn't been specified. Is it OK to use the arbitrary value of 1 L? That's what my textbook seems to have done, despite not mentioning anything and I'm not even blind, I've read the question multiple times!
 
6:53 AM
@Kaumudi seems like you might probably want to ask a question on main about that
@Jan tbh though... you never finish the introduction :/ At one point you just need to stop. I also made the mistake of writing that first, while all my colleagues said: do that last so you don't spend too much time on it... But congratz on the progress! Don't forget to have some fun inbetween...
 
user228700
7:19 AM
@Martin-マーチン Oh, really? Sounded a tad bit homework-tsy...no?
 
well homework doesn't mean bad...
just make sure you include your research, the original question and what your issue with the concept is
it's a plus if its nicely formatted
I like well researched hw questions, and this one seems to have merit for future visitors
 
user228700
Erm, what can I include as my "research"?
 
7:50 AM
your way of solving the question up to the point where you got stuck
like which formula you use and why you want to use this formula
simply put your train of thought on how to tackle the problem
 
 
2 hours later…
9:27 AM
@AaronAbraham I guess Ortho was the real Trump after all.
Hey you two. How're you doing?
 
9:56 AM
@M.A.R. If @ortho intends on suspending newbies for low quality posts, introduces tougher penalties for crappy homework questions, disparages female users here and make Chem.SE great again in the process...then it's fine by me. ;D
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン Ah, OK, consider it done...in awhile :-P
 
@Kaumudi Only a "tad" bit homework-tsy, eh? ;)
@Martin o/
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン: Dyou have any idea about how to prioritize the rules for figuring out what the most stable resonance structure would be? I've got the rules...
 
user228700
I haven't been here a lot these past week. When does the seal drop by? Maybe I could ask him...
 
If you've already got them, then what's the issue?
 
user228700
10:00 AM
^ How to prioritize
 
Ah, from what I recall, I never had to prioritize the rules ._. Whatever structure satisfies the highest number of the rules would naturally be the more stable one. Ninte problem...enike piddi-kitti-illa
 
@AaronAbraham Classic ChemistrySEian.
 
11
Q: What is resonance? Are resonance structures real?

bonMy teacher told me about resonance and explained it as different structures which are flipping back and forth and that we only observe a sort of average structure. How does this work? Why do the different structures not exist on their own?

There is no most stable resonance structure
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン I mean in terms of energy.
 
@Mart I think he wants relative stability ;)
 
10:05 AM
In order to describe bonding in a resonance stabilised system, you need all resonance structures
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン Yes...
 
None of the resonance structures exist on their own, hence you cannot assign an energy to any of them
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン Wut? O.o Then this:
 
user228700
 
10:08 AM
this is wrong
 
@Kaumudi Pearson?
 
most textbooks teach resonance completely wrong
it's a shame
 
@Martin-マーチン That was what I was taught too @Mart ._.
 
user228700
@AaronAbraham I have come across structures with different energies (in terms of resonance) that follow the exact same number of rules :-| Ippo pidi kitiyo?
 
So how's it wrong?
 
user228700
10:09 AM
@AaronAbraham No, Solomon and Fryhles.
 
It's supposed to be a simplification of a complicated system, but it gets reduced to less than a simplified model.
To a bunker of grave misconceptions.
 
@Kaumudi A'a question upload eyyan pattum-oh ?
O.o
 
the question above pretty well explains it
 
I'm being general to creep you out.
 
@Martin-マーチン @Jan @Loong Zu denken, dass die Deutschen keinen Sinn für Humor hatten XDXDXD
 
user228700
10:10 AM
@AaronAbraham SHE. The hell man?
 
@Kaumudi Looks the other way
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン Oh God. Now what do I do? .__.
 
I tried suppressing my laughter...so now my throat hurts XD
 
user228700
@AaronAbraham Kore naal mumbe upload cheythatha. Nokatte.
 
@Kaumudi Alrighty
 
user228700
10:13 AM
 
@Kaumudi So you're an electrode?
 
No, she's an impostor ._.
 
user228700
@M.A.R. Why yes, I am.
 
user228700
@AaronAbraham U're just bored.
 
When you think about resonance structures, think about them being a linear combination of the bonding situation. Each resonance structure will have a different coefficient, so you just need to find the one having the largest coefficient to make sense of it
 
10:15 AM
@Kaumudi Nineke enganna mannasal-ai?
 
@Kaumudi in this example... A would contribute most to the overall bonding description and C least (from that set)
however, it is most important to understand, that none of these structures actually exist
 
@Kaumudi Wipe that smirk off of your face, trying to communicate in malayalam using the Latin alphabet isn't easy...@M.A.R. probably thinks it's an extreme form of pig latin :D
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン I understand why (A) would contribute the most, but what about (B) and (C)?
 
user228700
@AaronAbraham I'm not smirking .__.
 
@Kaumudi Oh...well...I simply assumed that...ah never mind :/
 
user228700
10:18 AM
@AaronAbraham I figured.
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン How did u figure out that (C) would contribute the least?
 
well they would probably contribute similar, with C a little less because the positive charge is located at a terminal carbon... but that's just educated guessing based on experience
 
user228700
Ah, dang it :-|
 
user228700
I guess all I can do is keep the rules in mind...and keep going.
 
resonance is nothing to be taken literally, it's just one interpretation...
 
user228700
10:21 AM
Ik, but see, we're supposed to take it seriously right now so, yeah.
 
@Kaumudi in school that is probably true, in university I would start questioning the qualification of the professor
 
user228700
@Martin-マーチン Nope. Not in university yet.
 
user228700
Anyhoo, OK, I'll keep going, thank you :-)
 
@Martin-マーチン hast du eine Minute? Es geht um die Adsorption :/
 
user228700
Idk German but is that ^ "Do you have a minute, I have a question about adsorption"?
 
10:24 AM
ok, but keep it in english here ;)
 
@Martin-マーチン g-block?
@Kaumudi Second bit's kinda wrong ._.
 
just ask in english, maybe some others can help out if I don't know
 
But you're German! You must know!
 
i might, but i wouldn't count on it
 
@Martin-マーチン Well, my Oxford Science Dictionary mentions (somewhere), that activated adsorption doesn't always imply chemisorption. But from what I've gleaned off of my books, chemisorption ist characterized by its significant activation energy requirement (to initiate chemical bonding between the adsorbent and adsorbate molecules/atom, hence the name); but physisorption doesn't really require that kind of energy, since the adsorption's facilitated by van der Waals' forces.
So is the dictionary right?
 
10:32 AM
sounds about right
 
Wait, the dictionary's right?!
:O
 
Well, in a way, yes I think so.
 
Darn.
Gimme a minute...
 
In physisorption the molecules are "bound" to the surface by the means of weak interactions... the usual vdW forces, London dispersion, (induced) dipole-dipole, maybe even h-bonding
this usually requires less activation energy to overcome. think entropy
in chemisorption you will form a bond between the adsobent and the surface
 
Listening
 
10:36 AM
naturally you have to somewhat modify either of them, there will be an energy penalty on deformation
 
Alright? And that penalty is the activation energy?
 
like the top layer of a surface will have to slightly rearrange itself, at least to a higher degree as with physisorption
 
yes that contributes to a higher activation energy
 
Okay, that bit's clear ^_^
Um @Mart then apart from chemisorption, are there other forms of adsorption that require a sizable amount of activation energy? (That's what the dic. seems to imply).
 
10:38 AM
on the other hand, the bonding energy between the surface and the adsorbent is also higher
 
Yep.
Well it is a chemical bond ;)
 
i'm not sure
it's not really easy to draw a line here
 
@Martin-マーチン I get that a lot these days XD
 
is h-bonding already chemisorption or not, what happens after a molecule is adsorbed via physisorption
 
But yeah, I kinda see the difficulties this poses
H-bonding isn't...well... a chemical phenomenon...so physisorption I guess?
 
10:42 AM
@AaronAbraham It's not easy to draw a line here.
I'm going to keep reminding you that every couple of days or hours.
 
h-bonding already has some covalent character, it's the strongest of the weak interaction, there is orbital contribution
If you ask a couple of scientists you's probably get a wide range of answers to what it actually is
 
Ah well, danke Herr @Martin
^_^
 
@Martin-マーチン Is it worrying that I initially read that as "Loong dispersion"? :/
 
@orthocresol "@Loong dispersion"?
 
10:49 AM
London dispersion
 
@orthocresol Nope, it's perfectly normal. ;) It's particularly common in seals.
@ortho I can't...resist...the urge...to rename myself paracresol... Gasp... Choke
@M.A.R. I'd like to see you try 3:)
 
@AaronAbraham It's not easy to draw a line here. OK, challenge accepted
 
@Kaumudi So you're a feminist, eh?
@M.A.R. BRING IT ON!!!
 
@AaronAbraham It's not easy to draw a line, or type a chat message over and over again here.
 
10:52 AM
I know :3
I just wait for ye to run out of gas...cheerio!
Bye @Martin @ortho o/
 
user228700
11:13 AM
@AaronAbraham Yes. Seriously, do something. U're vera level bored.
 
12:34 PM
@AaronAbraham Tag.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:01 PM
@AaronAbraham well, you can always do that if you want... lol
 
2:33 PM
@AaronAbraham it's not easy to draw a line.
 
@M.A.R. o/
 
@Mithoron \o
 
You had a break for SE?
 
Yeah
I've decided to reduce my activity until this entrance exam thing is over.
Konkur, I mean.
 
Maybe I should make a break too
 
2:39 PM
@Mithoron Eh, do you ever spend too much time here?
 
What do you think is too much ;)
 
FYI, I will be AFK every Sunday to Tuesday. I can't promise I will be here any other weekday, but I'll try to be here every Wed, Thu, Fri and Sat morning.
2
Please star that so everyone can see it
 
2:53 PM
@M.A.R. All the best.
I think I'm taking a break from life until 2020.
 
(づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ
 
3:13 PM
@orthocresol I already do that since 2011.
 
Now this looks too broad. The concept of what happens when something reacts, and whether it becomes more stable or not or can even exist is what whole fields of chemistry depend on. IMHO you should grab an introductory textbook or read some online tutorials for a start. — M.A.R. 14 secs ago
Am I right or left?
 
@M.A.R. Left, I think.
 
Thanks.
 
Guy's asking about chemistry of a rather specific system. The title should probably be changed to reflect that.
 
Well, I guess you could call it un-broad and solve it for the specific case, yeah
 
3:25 PM
In general, you'd eb right
 
Sometimes, questions just aren't questions.
@AaronAbraham it's not easy to draw a line here.
 
This specific case shows they do need a textbook.
And an elementary one.
A good answer is not likely to help them anyway.
And the question is either too broad or too localized so future visitors isn't a thing.
 
4:11 PM
@M.A.R. Keep it going! I'm here to cheer you on 3;)
Hey @Jan, guess what I found?
XD
@Kaumudi Well I'm not sure what kind of a level you're talking about; but what I am sure about is, that my level is Adhaku maelae :D
By the way, what was your percentile? The Boards I mean ._.
 
user228700
4:31 PM
@AaronAbraham :-P U know Tamil?
 
user228700
@AaronAbraham Percentile or Percentage?
 
@Aaron it's not easy to draw a line here.
 
user228700
Percentile=1%
 
@M.A.R. Deep breathing
@M.A.R. Would ye know what morocide is?
@Kaumudi Barring a few rather...*colourful* words, NO.
 
user228700
At least I think so, 'cause to write the entrance exam for IISER, your percentile has to be 1% and I did write it so yeah.
 
user228700
4:34 PM
@AaronAbraham :-P Cool.
 
@AaronAbraham Nope
 
@Kaumudi I wasn't aware IISER had a separate one ._. I thought it was clumped under KVPY O.o
 
1200 Google hits.
 
@M.A.R. This is why Pharmacology sucks...
 
That's not a good sign for something widely known.
 
user228700
4:35 PM
@AaronAbraham It has many streams. KVPY, JEE and an exam too. You can apply for as many streams as u want.
 
@AaronAbraham I know. It's not easy to draw a line in a pharmacy.
 
@M.A.R. Okay, now screw you -_-
 
@AaronAbraham It's not easy to draw a line when screwing people.
 
Oh yes it is ;)
@Kaumudi So, percentage?
 
AFK
 
4:37 PM
?
 
user228700
@AaronAbraham 94%
 
Ouch...lemme guess, Math did you in?
 
user228700
Not really.
 
user228700
Got 95 in Math.
 
4:38 PM
O.O
 
user228700
Like 10 people I know got 95.
 
Stay away from me
-_-
 
user228700
Everybody else got like, in the 60s and 70s. God, it was brutal.
 
Very...had a look at it.
 
user228700
Yeah :-/ But I didn't mean the paper...I meant the fact that so many scored so less. That was brutal.
 
4:39 PM
I guess our paper'll be more-or-less the same ._.
 
user228700
Yeah :-/ And the worst part is that they actually told us that our paper was gonna be easier for God's sake >.<
 
I really don't know how two guys from our school scored a 100 on the paper -_-
One of 'em got a 100 for Chem and Phys. too...but he got a 91 for computer science....OUCH, now that was brutal.
 
user228700
The reason I got only 94% is complicated. Lost 8 effing marks in English somehow and the thing is, LOADS of paper screwed up Physics 'cause it was kinda tough so they went and graciously gave marks but Chemistry was easy BUT I forgot some stuff so ended up getting only 91
 
user228700
Not fair.
 
user228700
But again, got 95 in Math so cannot complain.
 
4:43 PM
._.
Oooh, he came 8th too, for the Kerala PET ^_^ That probably explains it..
 
user228700
Wow.
 
Now our teachers expect us to outperform our seniors....we are so screwed.
 
user228700
:-P Good luck!
 
user228700
I'm SOOO glad to be done with 12th.
 
I'll need more that luck -_-
@Kaumudi Gee, lucky you -_-
 
user228700
4:45 PM
God, the projects, the practical exams!
 
user228700
:-P
 
Record.work.sucks
 
user228700
Seri, I've gots to go, g'night!
 
user228700
@AaronAbraham Music helps.
 
Sheri
 
user228700
4:46 PM
Whatever :-P
 
@Kaumudi I only do classical
 
user228700
Whatever floats ur boat.
 
Bach
MY boar?
Ah
 
user228700
Night.
 
Um, Gute Nacht o/
Poi kedukadi already for crying out loud! XD
@Kaumudi My boat's ... sinking like it just got torpedoed by a U-boat ._.
@M.A.R. You alive?
 
5:40 PM
hey can anyone tell me what are these things called..encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/…
please tell me fast.
@AaronAbraham,you can't hide the fact(from me) that you are an Indian, I always read your chats where you talk about JEE,KVPY...........,by the way did you gave this year's KVPy??
 
 
2 hours later…
Jan
7:15 PM
@AaronAbraham Relevance = ?
 
Jan
7:49 PM
@ortho still looking for bounty-able question btw =C
 
8:00 PM
@Jan I haven't seen anything. :( I've been really quite busy the last few days, so I haven't been around as much as I usually am.
 
Jan
8:16 PM
I just wasted it on a random mechanism question now. But it’s not enough; needz moar bounty questions kthxbai!1
 
5
Q: What is the role of NaHSO3 in syn diol formation from alkenes with OsO4?

CharlesAll I have found on this is that NaHSO3 reduces partially the osmate ester, so breaks off Os and leaves a syn diol. Is it possible to show this step with arrows showing the process of electron movement? I suppose this step is not the main part of the reaction, and mayn't be very important, but I ...

 
 
2 hours later…
10:10 PM
Hello
 
Jan
10:21 PM
o/
My hockey teams won \o/
 
Nice job ! :)
Give me your 200 reputation lol
 
Jan
Nah ô.o
Give me a proper answer, first.
 
I'm looking for a mechanism but I guess even if in masterorganicchemistry.com they said NaHSO3 can be use as co-catalyst it is just to make a buffer
I wonder if I can use Eschweiler-Clarke in this reaction :P
 
 
1 hour later…
11:37 PM
Does "to damp" means "add water ?
 

« first day (1660 days earlier)      last day (2730 days later) »