OGNext - Next-level personal OGame assistant

[skiwi2/OGNext] skiwi2 pushed commit aed7ad93 to develop: Added Fleet domain object and linked it to the Planet domain object, added FleetService and migrations.

[skiwi2/OGNext] skiwi2 pushed commit 4e7b2189 to develop: Removed extra whitespace.

Mast

skiwi

Could use some extra padding ^^

Mast

For some reason the padding on the 2nd button row isn't working like it is on the top row.

skiwi

What part of the site is this though?

Mast

div#above-graph-row {
    margin-top:2%;
    margin-bottom:2%;
}

div#below-graph-row {
    margin-top:2%;
    margin-bottom:2%;
}

Identical...

@skiwi It's not on the server yet

Only working stuff is on the server ^^

skiwi

12:23 PM

I mean what part of the system

What does it represent

Mast

Graph viewer.

skiwi

Which graphs can we put in there?

Mast

Every.

Playerscore, alliance score, amount of planets of a player over time, etc.

skiwi

Okay

Duga

[skiwi2/OGNext] skiwi2 pushed commit c31a0cd9 to develop: Added controller method to accept sending of fleet of an user.

[skiwi2/OGNext] skiwi2 pushed commit 5eb6c306 to develop: Added service method to BuildingsService to update the number of solar satellites.

[skiwi2/OGNext] skiwi2 closed issue #16: Store fleet of a planet

[skiwi2/OGNext] skiwi2 pushed commit af209b79 to develop: Added controller method to accept sending of shipyard of an user, closes #16.

Mast

12:44 PM

@Duga Can we also store enemy fleets now or just scraped fleets?

Duga

[skiwi2/OGNext] skiwi2 pushed commit 03b6c653 to develop: Renamed level parameter in defences, fleet and shipyard to amount.

[skiwi2/OGNext-Userscript] skiwi2 pushed commit 0429105e to develop: Renamed level parameter of defences to amount.

skiwi

@Mast The issue solved is explicitly for storing own fleet

But the domain model can be used for any fleet

Mast

I suspected as much, good.

skiwi

You'd really think I'd make something non-generic? ^^

Mast

No ^^

I'm happily surprised ever time I see the contents of a commit.

skiwi

12:54 PM

Good

Mast

1:22 PM

By now we store everything of the player, right? Buildings, Fleet, Defence and Research.

Putting that in a view would make an empire monitor.

Making that responsive is going to be awful.

How many planets do we support on one screen, maximum of 9? What if somebody has 12?

skiwi

@Mast Yep

Mast

You can't shrink columns indefinitely.

skiwi

I'm not sure if we should have an empire overview

Mast

Legal reasons?

skiwi

Might conflict with GF

Mast

1:28 PM

Yea, I was thinking about that.

skiwi

Though I do want some kind of overview where we can see if everything is imported correctly

Just maybe not super nicely formatted?

Mast

Would make for a good question on gamedev/law/somewhere.

@skiwi I can do datadumps.

skiwi

Just a simple HTML table with planets as columns and other as rows should be enough

Mast

2:06 PM

Are we storing moons yet?

skiwi

2:36 PM

@Mast Nope

That's a bigger todo ^^

Essentially it's copying the planet and copying everything that involves the planet, ugh

Don't know a real better solution atm

Mast

Make the moon a child and member of the planet.

Or well, not sure if it should be a child. But definitely a member.

Perhaps planet should be a member of moon, basically a planet is a moon + coordinates.

skiwi

That's another issue, I'm thinking to store them seperately though

Bigger duplication-wise issue is that planet and moon are different concepts, so logically we should treat them as such (no inheritance)

But the only difference they have is that one has PlanetBuildings and other MoonBuildings

Mast

They should both inherit from a base class.

Make everything they have exactly in common part of the base, let them both inherit and expand on that.

skiwi

I think that's going to give a load of trouble with Grails right now

Mast

Why?

skiwi

2:54 PM

Because Grails ^^

Bleh, players are too active today

And I"m really short on deut ^^

At least on my new main

Mast

3:07 PM

@skiwi Want some?

200k enough?

skiwi

3:36 PM

@Mast I'd need to be able to pay for that :P

I could use some... but it's at 1:370:8

Mast

@skiwi I can bring it you anywhere.

Happen to have cryst? Although I'll take anything for it, 3:2:1.

skiwi

I'd prefer some mix of metal and crystal

Mast

Sure.

skiwi

Sorry I'm not that good at multitasking ^^

How much deut are you willing to trade?

I'm thinking about 1:1 ratio metal:crystal then

@Mast Can we do it now?

I'm here for a bit :P

Mast

3:56 PM

@skiwi In that case I'm hoping for a lot of crystal :P

skiwi

I've got about 9M metal, 3M crystal

Eh wait, that's Izar

Got 350K metal and 160K crystal on 1:370 now

Mast

@skiwi Between 150 and 200k.

skiwi

I'll take 150K then

Mast

For 150k cryst and 150k metal?

skiwi

That would be 450K metal = 1.5:1 ratio with m:c gives 270K metal, 180K crystal?

Does that make sense?

Mast

4:00 PM

You're proposing to send 270k metal and 180k crystal instead?

That would work.

Is actually quite a good deal for me.

skiwi

I'm not sure

150K deut is worth 300K crystal at max?

Mast

Usually in a starting universe the ratio is 3:2:1.

3 metal for a deut. 2 cryst for a deut.

skiwi

Yeah, I think my math is off

Mast

So 450k metal for 150k deut or 300k cryst.

skiwi

because 120K crystal can never translate to 270K metal

bontchev.my.contact.bg/ogame/tradecalc.html

It says I give you 180K metal and 180K crystal in return

But I don't have 180K crystal just 160K :P

Mast

4:03 PM

So 180k crystal would be 90k deut, leaving 60k deut worth 180k metal. Yes.

skiwi

225K metal and 150K crystal then?

Mast

That means 160k crystal worth 80k deut, leaving 70k deut worth 210k metal.

Or 150k crystal worth 75k deut, leaving 75k deut worth 225k metal, yes.

Sure.

Coords? ^^

1:31:12

4:07 PM

You at 1:370:8?

skiwi

Yep

Mast

ETA in 55 minutes.

I'm glad you no longer need to account for fuel in your transport bay.

skiwi

Two fleets even ^^

Mast

4:25 PM

@skiwi Like I'm going to store 200k deut in one location ^^

One of my planets is kind-of a dedicated deut factory.

skiwi

5:00 PM

@Mast Right

Duga

[skiwi2/OGNext-Userscript] skiwi2 pushed commit 2ca9d303 to develop: Fleet numbers are now scraped from the Fleet page and sent to the OGNext instance.

[skiwi2/OGNext-Userscript] skiwi2 pushed commit 23473877 to develop: Changed incorrectly named buildingId to defenceId in the processDefenceNodes function.

[skiwi2/OGNext-Userscript] skiwi2 closed issue #15: Scrape fleet of the user

[skiwi2/OGNext-Userscript] skiwi2 pushed commit 38b65609 to develop: Fleet numbers are now scraped from the Shipyard page and sent to the OGNext instance, closes #15.

[skiwi2/OGNext-Userscript] skiwi2 added label bug to issue #17: Planet-unique data is incorrectly cached

[skiwi2/OGNext-Userscript] skiwi2 opened issue #17: Planet-unique data is incorrectly cached

> Data that is unique for every planet (Defences, Fleet, Shipyard, Buildings, etc.) is currently cached per player via `executeIfNotCached` which uses `getFullCacheKey`, which in turn uses `getSetting` which uses `getFullSettingsKey` which uses the server group, universe id, player id and the key.

This means that if two planets have the same data, they will not get updated correctly.

As solution the planetId should be included in the cache key, additionally a new mechanism should be used t

skiwi

With great power comes new bugs

Mast

5:19 PM

lol

2 hours later…

Duga

6:58 PM

[skiwi2/OGNext-Userscript] The-Quill starred us

3 hours later…

skiwi

10:26 PM