In the Forster rate expression, what values are dependent on temperature?:
Forster orientation factor, k^2
the refractive index of the solvent, n
The spectral overlap, J
the quantum yield of the donor, $\Phi$
@bolbteppa A $p+1$-form is naturally suited to be integrated over a $p+1$-dimensional volume to obtain an action for it. A $p$-brane sweeps out a $p+1$-dimensional worldvolume.
@JohnDuffield is there any correlation between the 26 dimensions in string theory and letters of the alphabet? Did they just choose 26 for labelling convenience, or was there another reason?
@ACuriousMind Not my choice (also note that the fields $\mathcal O$ are not what depends on the $g$'s, it's hidden in the exponential from the expectation value)
@Danu Uh, no, that's not a scale transformation in the sense one usually uses the term. The "scale invariance" refers to the theory not changing when one changes the renormalization scale.
@ACuriousMind The index is not free---it is summed over by the Einstein convention (yes, shitty notation to sometimes write sums explicitly and sometimes not, again not my choice)
@ACuriousMind They're observables that transform in this special way
...which I think is just the conformally covariant transformation right
@Slereah What is the animal translation of $$\mathrm{SW}[\phi,A]=\int_M\left(|\nabla_A\phi|^2+|F^+_A|^2+\tfrac{1}{2}R|\phi|^2+\tfrac{1}{8}|\phi|^4\right)\,\mathrm{d}v$$
Questions like this one are why I dislike the "mainstream physics" close reason.
The question may be a duplicate, it may be poorly constructed, etc., but it's a reasonable question in its own right and closing it for being "not mainstream" doesn't make any sense.
@JokelaTurbine Right off the bat (I haven't read the whole question yet), I might advise condensing it. Three pictures, long paragraphs, and a less-organized-than-in-an-optimal-world structure make for a post that is a bit confusing.
@JokelaTurbine Reading that question, I have no idea what 80% of the stuff in it has to do with the question in the title, or the question you actually pose at the end. Why are you talking about Moses and longer lifespan? What do these pictures in there have to do with anything?
Yeah thanks for reply. But this is physics, not math. To me it means the we make our hypothesis allways in somekind of real context. In physics we dont masturbate with n-dimensions, we just have the x,y,z, and maybe time and what ever is relevant. I am trying to shood down this stupid idea, which has irritated me for few years, and which I haven't been able to prove wrong.
@JokelaTurbine In addition, the mistaken premise doesn't help. The Sun does not influence Earth's rotation. Given that ~75% of the post is based on that, you may want to fix that misconception. There's nothing wrong with asking a question based on a misunderstanding - I've done that before - but forging ahead after learning that the premise is incorrect isn't a good idea.
> This all seems plausible, but the Question; Would the Atmosphere survive this higher rotation speed? -remains open. I think that the magnetic field would be stronger through the higher rotation speed, and thus solar winds are in control.
No. The cause of the Earth's rotation is not the Sun. The Earth is rotating because it was rotating when it formed 4.5 billion years ago and because the torques exerted mostly by the Moon are small. The torques exerted by the Sun are much smaller yet. Dinosaurs did not need reduced gravity. Our ancestors did not live almost 1000 years. Your hypothesis has nothing to do with climate 4000 years ago. — David Hammenyesterday
In the Forster rate expression, what values are dependent on temperature?:
Forster orientation factor, k^2
the refractive index of the solvent, n
The spectral overlap, J
the quantum yield of the donor, $\Phi$
