« first day (31 days earlier)      last day (3156 days later) » 

3:51 AM
0
Q: Why Am I Banned From Editing?

albertI was going to fix a typo I came across in an answer and saw that I am temporarily banned form making edits. I'd like to know why, and how come I was not notified that action(s) were taken against me. I find that to be pretty odd. After 5+ years in the Stack Exchange community, I have yet to come...

 
 
3 hours later…
6:47 AM
Are open conent and free content on-topic?
 
 
2 hours later…
8:51 AM
@Pandya annoyingly, the best I can say is "they probably are" -> meta.opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/212/…
I think roughly everyone wants them to be on topic, but I still expect some close votes for off topic, which I don't think will go through
however, my crystal ball is still on the beach
 
 
1 hour later…
 
2 hours later…
11:47 AM
@Pandya In general yes, but not necessarily all questions, just as not every question about free/open software is on-topic
 
12:02 PM
@Pandya Quite honestly, let it come. If there's something to do with OSI, FSF or CC, then let it be in the scope.
 
12:28 PM
There is question. But no idea when moderator will be elected (or provisional selected). Has anyone idea about it?
 
Well, I'll tell you this - Elementary OS which has been in beta shorter than us already has mods...
You can add a comment to ask when we get them I suppose, but they'll take their time and make their choice when they feel its the time
 
These things take variable time
 
Any idea about when community mod election will start?
 
Exactly, mod elections will start when the site graduates
which will probably be a really long time
 
maybe they're giving it a bit more time on OS.SE because it's a more controversial site and they want more time to observe potential mods
Or maybe they've already contacted some people and one of them is taking time to reply
 
12:35 PM
I wouldn't be surprised
 
That can delay things
@Pandya in a few years, probably
 
Oh yes, mods have to sign a mod agreement, right?
 
@Zizouz212 the concept of graduation is dissolving, now a site can have elections without having a design or without having privileges raised etc
@Zizouz212 that happens after the official announcement
 
That's true
 
Also I am curious about on-topic of this site. Who can do it? and when will be? @Gilles any idea?
 
12:37 PM
@Pandya can be edited by moderators
 
Yep
I'm pretty sure they'll get that done quickly too :)
 
@Pandya I narrowed the Java licensing question a little to just libraries, which might make it less broad, not having to lug along the rest of the JDK (some JVM with various licensing possibilities, javac or other compilers, and the rest of the bintools)
could you see if you think this is better?
 
@Gilles but we have no mods so I think it can only be done by community manager/employee type moderators. Or only after mod elected for this site?
 
@Pandya mods will do it when we have mods
SE employees can do it of course, but they leave it to community mods
 
We'll get mods in less than a couple weeks, that's for sure. They'll be able to do it then
 
12:42 PM
@Martijn by the way, I've not voted to close as too board. (I see one vote for close but it is not from me)
 
@Martijn It looks fine: I haven't voted to close, but it doesn't look broad at all too me.
 
the voter had a point though, it was getting rather broad, and an answer to the less broad question is probably better than one to the broader question
 
@Zizouz212 thanks for reply.
 
@Zizouz212 there is painfully much licensing history for "Java" (which is an almost impossibly broad term in itself)
 
Thanks for a double ping :P
@Martijn Maybe separate questions for Sun java and Oracle java?
 
12:45 PM
@Zizouz212 edited/corrected :D
how do it 's for sure?
 
edited?
 
there is javac and the various other binutils, there are a plethoria of JVMs (Sun/Oracle HotSpot, JRockit, IBM J, JamVM, ZeroVM), there are the competing web runtimes IcedTea and the "normal" one (plus the JavaFX family of things)
leaving all that out makes for a far clearer scope
 
That's true
This is trickier than it looks...
 
there still is the Sun/Oracle transition with its license changes, not everything being in OpenJDK, the question on what is "official" and what is not (think your own JAI)
and a really good answer could touch on Apache Commons and Google Guave which are used by many as if they were auxiliary standard libraries, each with their own licensing
 
My issue with Java right now is they don't make anything clear with anything...
I swear, now I need to figure out how to write my own tiff plugin...
 
12:51 PM
as far as standard standard libraries go, they are all GPL2 + classpath exception
which means they are effectively fully permissive
 
Well, that's a good thing: It seems you can't even distribute the standard libraries - they must have java installed on the computer
 
or LGPL style more or less
you can distribute the standard libraries, no problem
it's all OpenJDK
and it's commonly done as well, except for official packages for Debian and derivates
 
Stupid java...
Anyways, any thoughts on this question? opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1340/…
 
SE is down for me :o
back up, picknick over
 
SE is down?
 
12:55 PM
it's back up for me
 
I'm wondering about posting a similar version on Meta SE
Maybe I'll slap a big bounty on it if it gets a lot of attention/votes/views, and hopefully I'll actually get an answer from someone at SE :)
 
By the way, I don't really know how the community wiki answers work, because I haven't read the terms and conditions, but the likely scenario is that each rivision is owned by its respective author (i.e. no transfer of copyright to SE or anything) and the combined work is collectively owned and licensed CC-BY-SA just as anything else
but I'm not 100% sure on the no transfer of copyright. Maybe there is some CLA-like thing in effect for community wiki stuff
I can tell you for sure that the former is how Wikipedia works
 
Interesting... Can you add that as a comment maybe?
 
not sure if it fits :D
 
@Martijn you mean the community wiki feature of Stack Exchange? No impact on copyright
Technical impact: it lowers the reputation threshold for unreviewed edits, and doesn't earn the original poster reputation
 
12:59 PM
@Gilles so just a combined work with each edit owned by its author under CC-BY-SA?
 
Moral impact: it's a sign to others that the original author doesn't mind and even encourages significant edits
 
@Gilles opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1340/… is waiting for your answer :D
 
@Martijn each author who made a significant contribution
 
well, they can hardly own anything that is doesn't meet the threshold of originality under US law
 
Wow, this will be fun :)
 
1:01 PM
I am thinking to start chat-room for discussion on and . Is this good idea? (Though I've not specifically many questions/discussions for it; but If it will be helpful to all and our community)
 
Keep it here
 
@Pandya I personally very much oppose fracturing chat rooms until we have to because there is too much traffic on the main chatroom to get anything done
and from my perspective, that point will likely be never, or very far in the future when a spit social/business can be made
 
Exactly, and then it keeps all the discussions in one place
 
I mean discussion which specifically focus on on-topic & scope only.
 
For the bikeshed :)
Isn't much else that we talk about here
 
1:04 PM
@Pandya why do you think it would be better if they were not discussed here? (not a hypothetical question, but an honest one)
 
@Zizouz212 Ok. I understood (cancelled to start another). @Martijn
 
Alright :)
@TrevorClarke Are you around?
 
@Zizouz212 yes
 
I could be right in assuming that you downvoted my license recommendation question?
 
um
sorry which one
this one
0
Q: License for Graphics Design Program

Zizouz212I've written a Graphics Design program, with less functionality than Photoshop, but more than MS Paint. I've targeted the application towards teenagers and kids, mainly for educational usages for subject fields such as Graphic Design, Photography and Digital Art. I've started writing it for my fi...

 
1:15 PM
0
Q: License for Graphics Design Program

Zizouz212I've written a Graphics Design program, with less functionality than Photoshop, but more than MS Paint. I've targeted the application towards teenagers and kids, mainly for educational usages for subject fields such as Graphic Design, Photography and Digital Art. I've started writing it for my fi...

lol
Yep, that's the one
 
You shouldnt assume
but yes it was me
 
I kind of figured :) Anything to improve?
 
I dont like that kind of questions like

"Which license would be best suited for my purposes?

"
idk
search google
thats how i feel
at least
 
Wats?
Search google? How will google help me on that?
 
well i feel like you could find this answer by searching google
and plus its opinion based
is it not?
 
1:18 PM
It's a license recommendation question... Of course it will be opinion based
 
ok
I dont like questions like that... but i guess
 
Regardless, google won't apply to specific situations, but thats my view
 
yup
anyway i cant undownvote
 
What's wrong with those sorts of questions?
 
unless you edit
 
1:19 PM
Sure, I'll edit it
 
there
hey you want to email me that program
il try it out
 
I'm still alpha testing it... So there's still I ridiculous amount of bugs
Here, let me do this
 
thats ok
 
"if it's not on github/bitbucket/gitorious it doesn't exist" :P
host it, for proverbial shits and giggles and git experience
:D
 
0
A: Licensing Community Wiki Posts at SE

GillesYou're conflating features of the Stack Exchange engine, which copyright law doesn't care about, with ownership and licensing. All user content (i.e. the posts and comments, not the user interface bits) on Stack Exchange is owned by their authors (there is no transfer of copyright — that's not e...

 
1:23 PM
@Gilles That looks like an amazing answer :)
 
@Zizouz212 Your question is partly based on a false permise
You misread Martijn's answer
 
That's the version I did for school, but I'll let you guys know when I release the real, amazing one
 
The original author may make their work available under a dual license
The content that's on Stack Exchange isn't dual-licensed
 
Ok, I understood it that a user can add a license to anything they contribute to the site, not that SE is dual licensed, but anything that a user contributes to will be licensed with both the SE license (CC-BY-SA) and the license that the user states
 
hey ziz
 
1:26 PM
@Zizouz212 open source how? I don't see a license file in the jar, nor do I see any other copyright information, nor do I see any source jars, or any other place where I can download the source :P
if it's open source, you're violating your license :P
 
lol, that's just the program
 
@ziz when u click on the navbar.... it puts dots lower down
 
@Zizouz212 I know, and you're destributing it without copyright, or licensing information
which means it's not open source :P
 
I did that for school, so there's a lot of bugs. The real open source one (which isn't open source yet since I'm trying to at least perfect it) is still with me at home, but I'm in Norway now
 
Obviously I'm teasing you a little, but it's not untrue what I'm saying
 
1:27 PM
No, of course
 
open source is more than just saying "hey, this is open source!"
 
It's just weird, I wrote that program the night before it was due...
Also, don't try to save it... It just creates an empty file with absolutely no contents for some reason...
Stupid javax imageio...
 
1:43 PM
may have helpful information for you
 
@ziz why are you in norway
 
I'm visiting family :)
 
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
 
yep
 
 
1 hour later…
3:01 PM
Wikipedia Portals. That's an idea that never worked out.
 
3:19 PM
hey
 

« first day (31 days earlier)      last day (3156 days later) »