12:00 AM
com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeException: com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeIOException: org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: chat.stackexchange.com failed to respond
com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeExceptionFactory.newException(MechanizeExceptionFactory.java:31)
com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeException: com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeIOException: org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: chat.stackexchange.com failed to respond
com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeExceptionFactory.newException(MechanizeExceptionFactory.java:31)
@AndrewThompson I prefer looking at these numbers. I know these numbers well enough. But, I will make these changes for other programmers' sake. — James Smith 13 secs ago
2015-05-17T00:13:20.018Z Exception in comment task java.net.UnknownHostException: api.stackexchange.com
com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeException: com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeIOException: org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: chat.stackexchange.com failed to respond
2 hours later…
3:13 AM
Hi, welcome to stack overflow! This is a site were programmers get together and ask an answer questions that directly pertain to programming and software. I'm afraid your question is off topic for this forum. There are, however, plenty of sites dedicated to the art of android device rooting. I might suggest you look there. I'm sure they are much more suited to answer any and all of your questions on the rooting of your device. — AedonEtLIRA 1 min ago
4:53 AM
com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeException: com.gistlabs.mechanize.exceptions.MechanizeIOException: org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: chat.stackexchange.com failed to respond
2 hours later…
6:49 AM
3 hours later…
10:19 AM
They refer to
Other programmers on the web, that answered to the question. before posting this questions, I had some search about using Clipboard withing an asp.net and found that the answer is: using thread, I mean — Mehdi Dehghani 1 min ago10:37 AM
Nice! this pointer itself is safe to use at any moment. Members are initialized in order of their declaration. But base classes are at first. Consider this and write your safe code. Also consider that this pointer values will differ. And pointers arithmetic could make its place. Qt uses some safe hacks, I think. If you write the code, programmers will answer ;-) — avesus 1 min ago
This site is a Q&A for programmers in troubles with their apps. They are stuck on some routines or can't understand why a view doesn't align correctly... they show their faulty code and who of us can answer, does. — Der Golem 40 secs ago
11:41 AM
Why the C# program behaves differently from the C++ program is generally simple to explain, deadlock is highly timing-sensitive and of course the timing isn't the same. You however cannot ignore the elephant in the room, this code is never supposed to deadlock. Also very, very unlikely that anybody else can repro it. You'll need to get your machine fixed, that always start at the kind of shrink-wrapped malware that programmers voluntary install on their machine. Disable your anti-malware scanner and any cloud storage utilities like Dropbox etc. — Hans Passant 29 secs ago
12:04 PM
12:31 PM
5 hours later…
6:36 PM
I think I have a better way to format the question and I will move it to the Programmers exchange. Is there an quick way for me to move the question there and then reformat it or do I just have to delete it here then repost it? — Levi Fuller 43 secs ago
7:57 PM
@SpencerWieczorek: Perhaps poor wording but what he means is: "somewhere in your code the memory is still being referenced so they're never garbage collected". Among programmers who program in languages that have garbage collection built-in this is usually referred to "never released" because it's implicit what "never released" means. — slebetman 21 secs ago
8:37 PM
@Keith Thompson: kudos for this article, I fully agree with you, especially with the conclusion: I see far more incorrect uses of it than correct uses. Therefore, I never skip an occasion to warn newbie and experienced programmers about this bear-trap. Other ones on my list include:
strtok(), feof(), scanf() and friends, do/while... so many incorrect uses of all these! — chqrlie 53 secs ago@chqrlie: Something else I see used incorrectly far more often than correctly is multi-character literals like
'ab'. They're of type int and have an implementation-defined value; cases where they're actually useful are extremely rare. But I often see new C programmers confuse them with string literals. — Keith Thompson 48 secs ago
1 hour later…
10:10 PM
10:33 PM
The question is not off topic, it does contain purposely contorted pointer crap, but it is meant to be a test for programmers learning the arcanes of C pointers. As Joel once poetically summarized: understanding C pointers is a capability, you have it or you don't. This test will fail at detecting this capability because of too many false negatives. — chqrlie 1 min ago
« first day (117 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (3292 days later) »
