« first day (9 days earlier)      last day (489 days later) » 

Anonymous
14:00
I should've written "needs to be" but somehow I naturally came up with "need be" :-)
@Fantasier Put it in a funny way, we all always have an invisible calendar with us!
@DamkerngT. Yeah!
Anonymous
That works!
Thank you~ There seems to be countless interesting stuffs in language :) I learn something new about it every day!
Me too!
Today I learned must have and must have ... now. :-)
Anonymous
14:05
Affirmative modal need isn't really part of my idiolect
Anonymous
So I wonder how I came up with it
Ah, yes. Leech mentioned must and need as special.
Anonymous
Yes, and they vary between AmE and BrE
Anonymous
In AmE both mustn't and needn't are marginal
nods -- But must not should be alright in AmE, I think.
Anonymous
14:08
Yes
alright "all right. Many people consider this to be incorrect." -- Ah, good to know!
Anonymous
Yes
@DamkerngT. All right!
I learnt "alright" first, "all right" later. For a long time I thought "all right" was wrong!
Anonymous
14:09
But times change. To-day becomes today! :-)
Anonymous
Each other is on its way to becoming eachother
@Fantasier I learned "all right" first, then tried to compress it to "alright" later.
I learned the alphabet first.
Yeah, guess what? Me too!
Anonymous
14:10
I think alright is okay.
I think I'm gonna use someday more often, too. Not sure if it's a good idea.
Anonymous
Someday is normal
Anonymous
Be careful of the following distinctions: someday / some day, sometime / some time, everyday / every day
nods
And sometimes too.
Hmm... I can't see the difference between someday and some day.
Oh, I see.
Anonymous
1
Q: Is it ellipsis or appositive?

Nazmul Hassan"Hassan speaks Cantonese, not Mandarin." I don't know how "not Mandarin." is working here. Is it a parenthetical element? I think ellipsis may occur after comma, but I am not sure. Are there any ellipsis? If no ellipsis occurs here, please tell me how to understand where ellipsis occurs. I thi...

Anonymous
14:15
I feel the urge to answer "no"
Anonymous
Good question, though!
No.
Here! I did it for you.
@MARamezani Which type is it?
Anonymous
Thanks!
Wait, "not Mandarin" is not a phrase.
14:17
@DamkerngT. It's a question...
Wait...Isn't it an elliptic parenthetical?
@MARamezani :D
@Dam it's not an appositive.
It's not a parenthetical.
What phrase does it explain?
Anonymous
I'm still on Team No
hey guys , which is right "that question was rhetorical" or "that question was a rhetoric"
Anonymous
The former
14:20
@Gowtham Hullo!
I guess explaining it with ellipsis is probably the easiest.
@snailboat Me too.
@DamkerngT. And the correct way to do.
Hmm... Is rhetoric countable?
Anonymous
Not usually.
@DamkerngT. Yes. The plural: Rhetorix. (That reminds me of a dinosaur)
14:21
LOL
Anonymous
I think it can be explained without ellipsis
Interesting!
@snailboat Hmm..
@Gowtham I'd suggest using the former.
Can't think of a way to do it without ellipsis.
14:23
@DamkerngT. thanks
@Gowtham Doesn't mean I'm wrong!
My pleasure.
@MARamezani o_O
@MARamezani Oh, you mean using rhetorix?
Oooh. Indians really like saying wut.
Anonymous
14:24
Apples, not bananas, are my favorite fruit.
@DamkerngT. Nah. I told @gowtham rhetoric was better.
@MARamezani O.o
Of course, if he asked why,
I would've said because I said so.
haha
@snailboat I'm guessing that it's a noun phrase: [ Apples, not bananas, ].
Anonymous
14:26
I've seen a lot of Americans type wut
@DamkerngT. Seems far to me.
@snailboat Thais like to go to wats. :D
Anonymous
It was apples, not bananas, that she liked.
Hmmm
@DamkerngT. It took me a while to see what you did there lol
14:27
:D
Actually, on the contrary, I rarely go to Wats these days.
I'm thinking of expanding my revolution of hello to hullo to what to watt
Aww...
@MARamezani Wait, Watt is a unit, right?
@DamkerngT. Left.
...Well, I think we should probably get back to the more interesting point here :P
14:29
Yes, I want to read more about apples and bananas.
Anonymous
No, Watt is a name
Anonymous
The unit is lower case
@snailboat And a unit.
But not an SI unit.
Anonymous
14:30
But the abbreviation W is capitalized
@MARamezani named after the name anyway :D
@Gowtham SOMEONE ON MY SIDE!
@MARamezani It's an SI unit. (By derivation)
@Fantasier I dun goofed.
its not a fundamental unit, but a derived one ..or something
14:31
I meant it's a "derived" unit.
@MARamezani Which means it's still an SI unit!
Anonymous
So 3 Watts are three people named Watt, possibly related, while 3 watts is an amount of power
I know.
@snailboat Ooooh, but I used watt in the first of the sentence which makes it Watt, respectively.
5 mins ago, by MARamezani
I'm thinking of expanding my revolution of hello to hullo to what to watt
Lowercase.
Anonymous
The distinction is neutralized in that situationā€”but I was responding to Damkerng
I'm free of charge.
Anonymous
14:33
Who used it non-initially
ciao
Anonymous
Later!
Tatta!
is feeling like he should make a plea, but decided not to...
14:36
Good.
....
I just realised I'm in The English Learning Cabin and not the usual room.
Anonymous
Oh, a plea?
Anonymous
It's true.
@Fantasier We wrecked down the hall.
@Fantasier We have two rooms now!
14:38
@DamkerngT. Or rather, one room.
@MARamezani Did you burn it all down to the ground and tear every piece of the ruins apart by hand? Cause that's what I would've done.
@Fantasier Working on it...
Anonymous
Wow, you disliked the old room that much? :-) (I assume that's not actually what you meant, but it sounded like it!)
@snailboat I just sympathized with Fantasierium. Raises hands
14:40
@snailboat Nah, I just wanted to sound more aggressive and radical than him :P
Anonymous
MAR has a habit of renaming people
@snailboat I thought I used the right name. He has the symbol Fa next to Fantasierium.
I'm fine with that, I guess. As long as my name doesn't become Supercaulifantasieristicexpialidociousm or something.
Anonymous
That's a pretty long name.
@Fantasier Okay supercaulifantasiericexpialidociousim.
14:43
@Fantasier TM that! before MAR uses it!
Ah, too late!
Anonymous
And he made it even longer.
My laptop's mouse doesn't work. What should I do?
1) chat
2) die
3) do something technical
Anonymous
Hit the mouse with a blunt object
4) talk to your mouse
4) Go on a rant about this question's getting closed.
14:44
I didn't know laptops have pets.
Good to know.
Anonymous
Primarily opinion based
5) None of the above.
@snailboat It's a touchpad.
6) 1 &2
7) Definitely 2
Is your mouse's laptop ok?
@JimReynolds Let me check.
Anonymous
Oh, okay. I thought it was a mouse for some reason.
14:45
Wait a minute!
Ohhhh. So laptops' pets are so smart that they know how to use laptops!
Anonymous
Mice are cute
There are no laptops for the mouse.
Unless it steals them!
Anonymous
But I like all rodents
14:46
Poor mice in the labs.
@Dam here's a c-sirt.org report for a certain website. Does it look safe to you?
All rodents like you too @Snailor
@JimReynolds Let me see...
Oh wait.
Anonymous
Who is this "Snailor"?
14:46
My baaaad.
@JimReynolds Someone.
It actually gives a report on all of *bit.ly
Oh, so we have two different CSIRT?
@snailboat Who is *who is this "Snailor"?
No wonder it's so bad.
Anonymous
14:48
Mu
@snailboat Greek letter?
That's the sound of one u leaning up against an M.
@JimReynolds M is the master of the other letters.
I told it to be.
Because it's what that starts MAR.
In fact, it was M, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H... But nooo, jealous people couldn't have M as the first letter.
Anonymous
Read GEB
14:50
OK.
Anonymous
M is the first letter in the dictionary.
Anonymous
Lexicographers sometimes begin with M instead of A for various reasons...
Anonymous
The OED3 updates began with M, for example.
The main reason: They wanna plagiarize my name...
Ooooh, that kid's way outta his league
@snailboat Are you reading GEB in Japanese? :P
Anonymous
14:55
Hah! Now there's an amusing idea
Oh, that reminds me that we haven't seen "godel9" for a while.
Anonymous
You know I'm bad at Japanese, right? :-)
Eh? I thought the opposite!
Who's that?
@snailboat Right. You're terrible at Japanese.
@MARamezani A nice ELL user who uses the cover of An Eternal Golden Braid as his avatar.
14:56
And snails have jets behind their back.
Anonymous
Thanks!
Anonymous
Snails do have jets, but they don't use them often
Anonymous
They're content to live slow, peaceful lives
@DamkerngT. Stop pinging me, when was the last time this eternal guy visited here?
@snailboat If snails use Mozilla, they might find Jetpack useful!
@MARamezani Dunno. Last year, I think.
14:57
o.0
Oh, Last seen Mar 18 at 2:26
How on Earth did you get reminded of him? Are you running a defragment process or something?
Oh.
@DamkerngT. I thought they were eternal.
Quite possibly.
@Fantasier Our chemicaloid eyes can't see it/him/her.
You need to be the worthy one.
15:00
Somehow I remember him as him, but I could be wrong about that...
Oh, I meant the chosen one.
@MARamezani The One in Kung Fu Hustle?
The One is a movie itself.
Oh, yes!
K. Gotta go. Later!
15:04
Later!
15:21
0
Q: Does "That thing/one I don't know" sound natural?

Arman McHitaryanI know that some people use this when they want to say that they have no idea about that particular thing. But the thing is that, in my case none of them are native English speakers. So I thought it's worth to ask if natives use That thing I don't know. Though, indeed, it sounds OK and some nativ...

Oh, isn't this related to @Fantasier's that vs. the?
Hmmm
I think it's a distinct case. :)
'That Thing You Do!' is playing in my mind.
@Fantasier It's not exactly the same, but I think it's kinda related because of the that.
Hmm... it would be better if they made the sentence they heard non-native speakers said obvious.
Because I think "I'm not sure about that one. I don't know." is perfectly fine.
I think "That I don't know" is actually "That, I don't know" where that is fronted.
But "That thing/one I don't know." is more likely to be (?) "That thing/one (that) I don't know." So the two aren't quite similar.
15:28
Argh! Context, context, context!
Still have 'That Thing You Do!' playing in another tab...
What is 'That Thing You Do!'? A song?
In 2 million pieces lol
That must be painful :'(
hello everyone
@Fantasier Hmm... I thought it was "into a million pieces".
@Freddy Hello!
15:30
@DamkerngT. Oh, my bad lol
Yeah, wouldn't make sense with "in 2"
@Fantasier Still painful. :-)
For first time it happened that Maths S.E. is not answering my question!
@Freddy Congrats!
ups that was typo, I meant not answering lol
"He can not only kill them, he can cook them for dinner, then use their skins to make a coat." — Tetsujin 44 mins ago
:-)
@Freddy Oh, no! I'm sorry to hear that!
15:52
Note to self: It's not possible in English to recast "It must be true that [a clause in the present perfect]" with "It must have been ..."
a) It must be true that he's doing something now. --> He must be doing something now.
?b) It must be true that he was doing something then. --> He must ?be doing something then.
?c) It must be true that he's been doing something now. --> He ?must have been doing something now.
d) It must be true that he'd been doing something then. --> He must have been doing something then.
Anonymous
Can we come up with a more specific example than do something?
@snailboat I'm still reviewing it. :D
I think anything that can be thought of an activity should fit the cases.
Perhaps, like watching TV, playing tennis, doing homework, etc.
Ah, I put ? at the wrong place, but I don't think it makes much difference.
Anonymous
Oh, you edited the examples
Anonymous
Let's see
Anonymous
15:57
> It must be true that he's eating dinner now.怀→怀He must be eating dinner now.
Anonymous
> It must be true that he was eating dinner then.怀→怀He must have been eating dinner then.
Anonymous
I don't think that generally must can be used as though it's a past tense form
Okay, I think I'm starting to see the point, the aspect is shifted to the time phrase in the "must have been" construction.
Anonymous
Surely historically it was one
Anonymous
But that's just etymology. Past must is dead, as far as I can tell
Anonymous
16:00
Though:
Anonymous
> %If he had stayed in the army he must surely have become a colonel. (CGEL p.109)
That works for me without surely, even!
Anonymous
CGEL claims some speakers allow must in this position
Anonymous
I don't. But apparently some do.
Anonymous
"However, such examples are rare and of marginal status; the remote conditional normally requires a preterite modal."
16:03
nods
Would have become, I think (that CGEL means).
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Yes, in their analysis the preterite modals include would as well as could, along with should (in certain uses), and might (for some speakers)
nods
I think my problem was sometimes I use must as if I use will and sometimes I use must as if I use would.
1
Q: had you done something, something else would happen or would have happened?

Cookie MonsterExample with a context (an excerpt from "The Art & Science of Java: An Introduction to Computer Science" by Eric Roberts): For example, executing the line println("Top student " + topStudent) would produce the following output: Top student = John Doe (#20456) Had you left out the impl...

I haven't read the comments in details yet, but I think the comments are weird.
(Because Had you left out the implementation of the toString method, Java would instead use the default definition of the toString method from the Object class. sounds better to me than would have instead used.)
To me, it's a hypothetical even tafter someone had written a code, but before the compiler would compile it.
Anonymous
16:19
It doesn't look like an error to me
I hadn't really read the comments yet, but it seems like all the comments say the original is bad writing.
Anonymous
Hmm, I think I like the original better than TRomano's version
Me too! -- Oh, I've already said that. Hehe!
Anonymous
We need to make sure we read the whole excerpt in context
Anonymous
> For example, executing the line [...] would produce the following output: [...]
Anonymous
16:21
> Had you left out the implementation of the toString method, Java would instead use the default definition of the toString method from the Object class.
Anonymous
The reader didn't actually do anything
Anonymous
And Java didn't actually do anything
Anonymous
They're just hypotheticals, like you said
16:37
Ah, "line of drawings" is another tricky phrase!
17:00
@snailboat You do linguistics, right? Do you know any history on this:
0
Q: Object pronouns + verb+ing

Cihangir ÇamAs non native speaker of English , I'm having trouble making sense of a structure pertaining to object pronouns. Likelihood of me doing this.... Your plan involves me attempting to prepare plans necessary for you. Chances of me getting into that school is high. What is it that est...

 
3 hours later…
Anonymous
19:55
@Catija I think F.E. and Araucaria have both written posts on that subject on ELL citing CGEL, and I believe StoneyB has written a couple that I can't find now which talk about the history
Anonymous
What specifically did you want to know about the history? How they came about? Which is more common, which was once more common, and how that's changing over time?
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I just think it's a coordination of noun phrases
@snailboat The latter of them. I'd be interesting to see if the switch to "me" is part of what I consider the laziness of many English speakers... There are many common usages today that would have been considered ungrammatical in the past... such as the rampant dropping of -ly from adverbs.
Anonymous
@Catija It's not laziness, but it is language change
Anonymous
I'm being made to listen to some very loud dubstep on some bad car speakers, through a wall
20:01
@snailboat I get that it's changing, I still think that a lot of it is laziness in speech... and people who aren't properly taught how to speak... but now I'm just starting to sound like Henry Higgins... which isn't an uncommon occurrence for me.
Hullo!
@snailboat Oh lawd, I feel sorry for you. I like my dubstep, but not other people's.
Anonymous
Well, regardless of whether the music's good or not, it sounds better when it's played back on good speakers in a good room and not filtered through a wall :-)
Anyone got any idea what kind of thing I should put on the first page of a book?
@snailboat I agree with that :)
Anonymous
@Iplodman "This page intentionally left blank"
@snailboat I don't want to make it sound like a test ;)
It usually has some kind of information.
Author name, etc.
Anonymous
20:07
You can worry about that after the book is finished once you've decided what to do with it :-)
^ :)
Anonymous
Write, write, write!
Anonymous
Didn't you say before you had one chapter finished?
Anonymous
Only N chapters left! :-)
I'm on the second c:
I wrote a plan (on a post-it note) today, since it occurred to me that I had a lack of one.
Anonymous
20:13
@Iplodman It's called front matter, by the way
Anonymous
In case you want to look it up
Hm, I wonder if a question about the use of whitespace in writing would be on-topic at writers.SE.
@snailboat Ah, thankee! Be blessed for thoust time!
:)
Anonymous
-est is a verbal inflectional affix :-) I heare, thou hearest, he heareth
Damn, you've out-grammar'd me :)
20:37
@snailboat Ahh, a comma that works like "and" it is!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Similar to X, but not Y
Anonymous
Though not exactly the same
Yes, that would sound different.
I think X, and not Y is closer.
Anonymous
Hmm, sounds reasonable to me
0
Q: What is the meaning of the term "beggage"?

A__A__0This phrase I heard recently in an airport in the US. I didn't completely understand the announcement, which she first mentioned "begs" which I understand, as in to beg for something. But then she said "Unattended beggage may be damaged or destroyed." I heard it many times, so I remember, this is...

It's interesting (that one's "baggage" is heard as "beggage" by another)!
5
A: blackā€”his gloves of finest mole -- what is mole?

CatijaA Mole: Their pelts are regularly used for various purposes and are extremely desirable for their soft texture: Moles' pelts have a velvety texture not found in surface animals. Surface-dwelling animals tend to have longer fur with a natural tendency for the nap to lie in a particular dire...

Ah, it's a big, big mole!
Anonymous
20:48
I didn't know people used mole fur
Me either!
News to me!
I don't know how it feels like.
Anonymous
Both answers mention it, though
Hullo @Iplodman!
Anonymous
20:50
I like moles
@DamkerngT. Hullo!
How are you? :)
I'm good, thanks. How are you?
Anonymous
Good thanks! Still writing the second chapter :)
Anonymous
There's a cuter picture :-)
20:51
@snailboat Aww
@Iplodman Yay!
Oops!
Anonymous
My new little snail is eating.
@snailboat Ah, your new snail seems to eat more than others!
Anonymous
Well, it's a growing snail! It needs nourishment! :-)
Anonymous
@Iplodman I don't have a name yet!
Anonymous
20:53
My other snails are Moon, Luna, and Ponyo
@snailboat How about Helio, as in heliocentric model? Goes with your space theme :)
Anonymous
Helios!
I remember someone suggested Sheldon (and perhaps Sandy) in another room. :-)
Anonymous
Kirke.
Ah, Helio matches Hullo very well! :D
Anonymous
20:55
Daughter of the Sun.
@snailboat Oh, I thought that's a male name.
@Iplodman Ah, yes!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Kirk is. You might know Kirke as Circe!
A bit more familiar but still not very familiar to me.
Anonymous
(Pronounce the 'e' at the end)
Anonymous
20:56
Circe is the Daughter of the Sun.
Anonymous
Grand-Daughter of the Ocean.
Anonymous
I was just free associating after Iplodman suggested Helio :-)
21:22
@snailboat That image is much cuter than the one I used.
21:53
The green text in @Iplodman's link has a 3D effect. First time I've noticed this. I see it on my phone screen. The green text appears to be closer, like it's printed on the nearer surface of the display glass.
22:13
@JimReynolds I think it's your phone that caused the 3D effect, perhaps.
Morning @Jim!

« first day (9 days earlier)      last day (489 days later) »