« first day (802 days earlier)      last day (97 days later) » 

Anonymous
13:00
@DamkerngT. As much as it's popular to pick on Sk8ter Boi and the like, I think the lyrics suit it pretty well
I haven't listened to Sk8ter Boi, but I like I Gotta Feeling. :-)
Anonymous
I think Sk8ter Boi and Friday are probably the two most mocked on that list
I wonder what they're mocked about. Word choices? Grammar? Something else?
I haven't heard Honky Tonk Badonkadonk either, but it sounds funny!
I know badonkadonk because of Ellen.
Anonymous
I don't recall where I first heard that word-ish thing
Anonymous
I will admit that Honky Tonk Badonkadonk has lyrics that are hard to listen to with a straight face
13:05
Ahh... I suppose so. (Not that I know its lyrics.)
Anonymous
Songs about behinds tend to make me roll my eyes a bit
Hehe!
I can't recall one in Thai at the moment. Maybe because they're not to my taste either.
Anonymous
There's lots of them in English
Anonymous
It's presumably a cultural thing.
Anonymous
I wonder if we Americans are the world leaders in songs about behinds
13:10
Hehe!
That makes me curious!
Anonymous
There's too much music around the world I don't know much about for me to proclaim with certainty :-)
But I assume that it's a tough job to collect the data. :-)
Anonymous
We need a behind-oriented ethnomusicologist on staff!
lol
I hope this is not too out of place. However unlikely it is, I remember one Thai girl explained to me why she liked NFL so much like this: I love all those 'behinds' in those tights
"..."
Anonymous
I know people who watch sports for that reason.
Anonymous
13:16
That sort of thing is one reason there are so many female wrestling fans :-)
Hahaha!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I don't think anyone really needs someone to tell them which songs have good lyrics or bad lyrics
Anonymous
I think people can come up with their own opinions :-)
Anonymous
And since songwriting is such a personal thing
Anonymous
If you're going to take inspiration, you pretty much have to do it from things which inspire you, right? :-)
13:23
@snailboat That's what I thought! I think it'd be better to mention why the author (of that Wikihow post) thinks those song are bad.
(But I assumed that it's a common knowledge among people who're more familiar with the songs.)
Anonymous
Knowledge is generally not countable
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I dunno. I can think of songs with dumber lyrics :-)
I can think of songs that I really don't want to hear!
About knowledge, I found that it's a very hard question!
Anonymous
Oh?
Yes. It's similar to one thing I'd observed in badminton.
Every time your skill reaches another level, what's wrong in the previous level will become right, and what's right will become wrong!
To an absolute beginner: "Hold your racket high!" (because they're too slow to react to the shuttle)
To an intermediate player: "Don't hold your racket that stiff!" (even when they're holding their racket high, sometimes it's too stiff)
To an advanced player: "Don't hold your racket high!" (because it will become less flexible)
Countability is similar to this sort of thing to me in a way.
Anonymous
13:38
Well, I did hedge and say generally not, though I might dare to say never in the appropriate context, like if we restrict it to Standard Modern English
Anonymous
Historically there were times when it was countable
Pathetic! PATHETIC! Sorry, I can't shout, so I have to shout here
@snailboat But even Macmillan still lists one sense of knowledge as singular/uncountable.
PATHETTTIIIIIIIICCCCCCCCCC! They think they teach chemistry?!
Anonymous
But it's true that countability can be a bit tricky because there are alternations between count and non-count in which one is overwhelmingly more common
Anonymous
13:39
@DamkerngT. Let's take a look!
Here is one of its example: Candidates for the job must have a working knowledge of at least one European language.
@DamkerngT. I know knowledge as a non-count!
@MARamezani I'm sure you know!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh, that's fine.
Anonymous
It's still non-count.
13:40
Eh?
Anonymous
You can't have two working knowledges :-)
Sure, but it has a, right?!
@DamkerngT. I remember cases with articles wherein articles didn't count.
As count noun "determiners".
Well, I see. Maybe my terminology is rusty. Let's say singular instead.
A similar case is in Persian also.
Speaking of Persian, I blew up the exam.
Anonymous
13:42
If you want to test for count versus non-count, check to see if the word occurs with cardinal numerals:
Anonymous
> a working knowledge
Anonymous
> *one working knowledge, *two working knowledges, *three working knowledges
Anonymous
Note that Macmillan agrees with me that it's non-count (they use the word "uncountable")
@snailboat Good rule of thumb.
13:43
I definitely won't say "one common knowledge", but how can I (or any learner) knows when I should say "a working knowledge" or "a common knowledge" and when not.
It's easy to just avoid it, but that's probably not a good idea in the long run.
Hullo @Arau!
@MARamezani Hi!
Hi @Araucaria! I saw your recent post. It's still in my reading queue.
Reality check: Have you ever eaten bread with water?
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Ah, I'm sorry, my explanation doesn't seem to be good enough so far
13:44
@MARamezani Rarely, but it happened!
@DamkerngT. Doing it now, and they sure put some spices in the bread. Burning to the hell and in the meantime, feeling like a barrel full of water.
I think yogurt is better at fighting a burning mouth.
I heard that milk can help. So, yogurt should work too.
@DamkerngT. I'm not a milk guy. I only drink two glasses every two days or so, and it's because of my parents' insistence.
Not to mention, I drink it in a single breath...So I won't taste it.
Oh, is it cow milk or goat milk?
@DamkerngT. Milk milk.
13:48
Hmm...
Anonymous
What type of milk is milk milk?
@snailboat Milk milk's milk milk.
It's not that creamy though, so it's dishonored from the family of milk milk milks.
Okay, I made a decision. I will grow my beard at 70, and I will stroke my beard a couple times every time I say "Hmm..."
@DamkerngT. What good would it do to have a beard in space?
@MARamezani I will look a little wiser. :-)
Here on Earth, or in space!
Anonymous
13:52
Plural knowledges spotted! nirakn.edu.au/about-us
@snailboat Hah!
A robot with beard. o.O
Anonymous
I guess I'll go back to my hedged version :-)
Anonymous
And say "generally not countable"
Anonymous
I always feel safer when I hedge.
13:53
@MARamezani Oh, another good thing: I can even swear "By my beard!" :P
Anonymous
Oops, I mean
Trying hard very hard to imagine that profile pic with a long funny brownish cartoon beard
@snailboat The National Indigenous Research and Knowledges Network (NIRAKN)!
Somehow lost the order of modifiers in that thing....
@snailboat How do you dare expect me to read three paragraphs to find a knowledges? I wished there was some search function....
Anonymous
If only browsers had such a capability!
13:56
I realize people use how do you dare? just when others have dared or will dare
Anonymous
I assumed you meant How dare you
@snailboat I'm not that old.
And, this ain't D &D.
No idea what that is.
Anonymous
None of what you just said made sense to me
People in Arqade say it much, so...!
@snailboat Good!
Now I'll sleep well at night!
Anonymous
I think all your alternatives sound strange
13:59
Yayya! Someone just didn't understand me!
Anonymous
I don't think it's a matter of age
@snailboat I know, that's the thing.
Just drank two PETs of water now
Anonymous
In the US most people don't know what PET bottles are
@snailboat PET = PolyEthylne Terephthalate
Anonymous
I'm not most people
14:02
If this polymer isn't used in creating water bottles in the US, then that's understandable.
Anonymous
No, the term just isn't used
@snailboat Chemist nerds use it!
Anonymous
Whereas in many cultures it's an everyday term everyone knows
OK, now my stomach feels weird.
I think PET is called something else in the US.
(Dunno)
14:05
@DamkerngT. I'm pretty sure it's not called dunno.
Surely, what you said is true!
Anonymous
We just don't call them by the material name.
Anonymous
We have lots of PET bottles. We just call them bottles.
@snailboat Well, you definitely aren't material-science enthusiastic kids!
14:06
It's just so fancy to use a word that you don't just run into: Tmesis
And phthalate.
Anonymous
Most of the time I run into that word, I'm the one using it, since it's one of my favorite words :-)
I remember our government ran a campaign on recycling and promoting PET was part of it. I think most 25+ Thais know PET because of the ads in that campaign.
Anonymous
It's such a rare initial letter sequence!
@DamkerngT. Heh. It's turned into a boring term in there.
Good thing there are no campaigns here.
Oh! How boring is it? Or why is it boring?
14:09
@DamkerngT. :
2 mins ago, by MARamezani
It's just so fancy to use a word that you don't just run into: Tmesis
Or PolyEthylene terephthalate.
Should I replace that fancy with dangerous?
@DamkerngT. They aren't that dangerous to a robot.
I don't understand IUPAC. Should there be a hyphen or space between poly- and ethylene?
O.0
I guess you don't need a hyphen there.
Has IUPAC published its style guide?
14:12
@DamkerngT. PolyEthylene makes me uneasy.
I bet there must be one.
Anonymous
Tmesis, pshaw, sthick, thwack/thwart
Anonymous
You usually don't capitalize the 'e'
@DamkerngT. What the...? Style guide?
@MARamezani A guide about how to write stuff in Chemistry.
14:13
You mean... Nomenclature set of rules?
Yes, sort of. (So you can be sure about how to write Polyethylene, if they mentioned it.)
@DamkerngT. Of course they have. Gimme a moment.
@snailboat Reminds me of the Chaos poem!
Anonymous
There's a fair number of ‹phl› words too
Anonymous
Like phlebitis or phlox!
14:15
Phlegm is the first word came to my mind!
(I remember that it's in Chaos too.)
Anonymous
If we're going by sound it's less rare, since we have to include ‹fl›, too
@DamkerngT. Eww.
@DamkerngT. Well the fastest I could find was the nomenclature of organometallic compounds.
That's gonna take a while to load.
Still counts as nomenclature.
Judging from other words in that document, I think you don't need either a hyphen or turning e into E.
14:18
@DamkerngT. IUPAC recommends. It's not style guide. It's you-must-do-it-or-you're-out.
count, maybe. But not count count.
@JimReynolds Welcome aboard, Houston!
:-)
I don't think I can stay to educate you people, however.
Just about time someone came in and blew our nice chat.
@JimReynolds So it's "sometimes count", perhaps?
Anonymous
14:19
@DamkerngT. Right, it's usually just polyethylene
I don't know. I'm just typing random contrastive reduplicatives, or whatever they are.
@DamkerngT. I turned e into E, to demonstrate the part that was capitalized.
Anonymous
Reduplication is fun!
Anonymous
It's common across languages, though languages use it different ways
@snailboat It's even fun fun, while most of the stupid grammar isn't.
14:21
O.O
Anonymous
If I may quote the inimitable Gertrude Stein:
Did MAR just learn how to make strikethrough type, or is it strikeout type?
Anonymous
> I really do not know that anything has ever been more exciting than diagramming sentences. — Gertrude Stein
Which type of type is it? It's not regular type type.
14:22
@JimReynolds It's strikein, You dolt!
@snailboat I wish to see schools make it explicit that diagramming sentences is part of grammar teaching!
Imbecile.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Maybe the modern sort of diagramming rather than the sort she did, but sure :-)
@snailboat She certainly haven't studied chemistry long enough.
How about the futuristic sort? 0.O
I am Jim Reynolds, grammatical psychic!
14:23
@JimReynolds Oh, you mean psycho?
Anonymous
Some schools still do Reed-Kellogg diagramming, which is a mostly useless skill
In the future, we will refer to everything as the past. O.o
Anonymous
In fact, learning it might actually make your grasp of grammar shakier than not learning it…
@snailboat Eh? Is it wrong?
14:24
@DamkerngT. Not all useless is wrong.
Oh, that's interesting!
Anonymous
But there are plenty of modern approaches to diagramming which can be instructive :-)
Anonymous
@JimReynolds I already did that, since we were already living in the future in 2015
Anonymous
I can't wait to get there!
Anonymous
14:25
Poor English tense system. I apologize.
Anonymous
Sometimes I worry I'll break English if I keep bending it.
Saying futuristic sort makes me think of bubble sort, quick sort, merge sort, and so on!
In chemistry, a Q with two votes is apparently a hot question. o.0
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh, that's interesting! Though the futuristic sort of the past future we live in might be the introspective sort :-)
Not to mention plain ol' sort sort.
Anonymous
14:26
@MARamezani 'Cause it's got at least one answer and it was answered quickly, presumably
Anonymous
Age is a large factor
Anonymous
You can find the formula on meta.SE if you look
@snailboat Have you seen their formula? It's weird, even weirder than them. o.0
Anonymous
That's an odd use of them
@snailboat I remember people didn't pick on that them
Anonymous
14:28
What's its antecedent?
Anonymous
The same as their?
@snailboat SE staff.
Anonymous
Meaning Stack Exchange (staff?)?
Anonymous
It was unclear to me, but I guessed right
Yet annnother chemistry guy in ELL. Dang, what would you do if we weren't here?
Answer: You would've cried...cried I say...
0
Q: Is it correct to use ‘on the 21'st' in this way?

Heniek Kowalski John Smith was born in Netherlands, on the 21'st of May 1981. Is this sentence grammatically correct?

Now I'm really tempted to ask him why exactly he thinks it would be wrong.
Aren't these kinda Qs off-topic for lack of specified concern?
Anonymous
14:32
Yeah, close for proofreading
Anonymous
Oh wait
Anonymous
They do specify a specific concern in the title
Anonymous
They forgot to include it in the question itself, so I didn't notice at first
Anonymous
But yeah, some elaboration would be good
@snailboat Oh, yeah. I guess titles are more neglected, between great minds.
Anonymous
14:41
@MARamezani I think the month is more often written first, though.
Anonymous
Searching COCA, I find the month is written first 88% of the time, and doing the same in BNC I find 67%
@snailboat May 21st. Yup. That's more soothing to ear and hear.
Anonymous
Just searching for on + month + number and vice versa
Anonymous
So that's not really exhaustive, it's only examining 21 May versus May 21 and the like
Anonymous
But other people have written more comprehensively about date formatting in AmE versus BrE, so I'll leave the rest to what's already written :-)
14:43
Well it's supposed to be the opposite of Persian, and the same as Arabic. Sounds definitely better to have the month at first.
Anonymous
Well, it's not like there's one correct way out of the two in English
user116848
hi
Anonymous
Both the way it's written and the way it's pronounced vary with dialect…
Hmm, this is what a site is telling me about my "personality".
Anonymous
Hello, arrowfar!
14:44
> Like ESFJs, ESTJs value continuity and order. They have outstanding organizational skills, and are meticulous and detail-oriented. Unlike ESFJs, ESTJs are followers and joiners; they are happiest when they belong to organizations, the larger and more mind-numbing the better. ESTJs often have an abnormal obsession with being normal at all costs.

ESTJs thrive in occupations which best utilize their organizational skills, such as driver's license bureau worker, junior bank teller, postal employee, COBOL programmer, or any other profession which involves long periods of mind-crushing tedium,
@arrowfar Hullo!
Anonymous
Ah, now there's pseudoscience
They're right!
user116848
Hello snailboat!
@snailboat That's why I'm surprised.
Anonymous
With a small bit of comedy mixed in
user116848
14:45
Hi MA
How is it going AF?
user116848
And Hi Damk and Jim!
@arrowfar Interestingly, Majid calls me MA too.
user116848
@MARamezani Same old same old. You?
Anonymous
Just don't call me SB, or people will get me confused with StoneyB :-)
14:47
@arrowfar Baffled by Shrodinger Equation. Yup. Life is great!
@snailboat What's wrong with snailor? I'll stick with it.
user116848
@MARamezani Okay, wow! Like wow! Like wow! Like, like...
user116848
kidding
Anonymous
Yes, unfortunately I threw away my sole bargaining chip when I promised to get your name right regardless of whether you kept calling me that ;-)
German words...Like English didn't have enough hard spellings already
Barauauraurau...
Anonymous
@MARamezani Just remember to type oe for ö
Anonymous
14:49
Schrödinger or Schroedinger
@snailboat Too lazy to find that char in my keyboard.
Anonymous
We English speakers are pretty lazy about diacritics
Anonymous
@MARamezani That's why you type oe instead :-)
@snailboat D'oh, yeah. I just misunderstood what you said at first.
Hi @arrowfar!
14:50
Hullo @Fantasier!
user116848
@DamkerngT. Hi!
@MARamezani Yes? Hello!
Oh, @Fantasier is here as well. Hello!
How is this possible? There are no first posts to review back at chemistry!
user116848
Hi @Fantasier!
Anonymous
14:51
The umlaut used to be a tiny e
Hello all~
Anonymous
Basically they moved the e of oe over the o
Guess people haven't had chemistry exams for some time.
Anonymous
And eventually it turned into a couple dots!
Or chemistry homework
14:51
@snailboat Poor e!
Anonymous
But you can still write oe :-)
@snailboat Now I'm trying to figure out how they crushed e like that.
People even skip E in grades!
> holydays
You know, misspellings are a good way to find religious people. :P
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. When I was little, E stood for 'Excellent'
14:54
Oh, that's nice!
user116848
I always write "I am". Does it look odd or should I contract it to "I'm"?
Oh, and since we're under some kinda cc, here's the source of the masterpiece.
0
Q: First time and past simple

user5577Can a french man say that: "Is it the first time you came to France?"to english people on holydays in France.I think it is possible because the action of coming to france is finished :they are in France now.Is it better to use present perfect " you have come"

@snailboat Heh.
Anonymous
@MARamezani It's an etymological spelling!
Anonymous
Like manyfold for manifold
@arrowfar When I type I am fine it means that I'm trying to suggest that I'm saying "I am fine".
Anonymous
14:55
There's no reason to suspect that someone who writes holyday is religious, though.
@snailboat OMG, so user5577 is Shakespeare?
user116848
@DamkerngT. Uh huh
Anonymous
@arrowfar I would suggest contracting it in speech any time you aren't specifically stressing the auxiliary (like Damkerng says, "I am fine", emphasizing the affirmative polarity of the sentence)
Anonymous
In casual online chat I would contract it most of the time, but it's not as weird to leave it uncontracted as it is in speech
@snailboat Polarity? You mean... Oh wait a sec. Too much chemistry.
Anonymous
14:58
Polarity: Affirmative ("I like snails") or negative ("I don't like snails")
user116848
@snailboat I see
user116848
Thanks!
Anonymous
If we want to emphasize that a sentence is affirmative, we often stress the auxiliary (and if there isn't one in the sentence, we add do)
@snailboat I know! Wow, in an empty room, the sound echoes nicely
Anonymous
"Here, have some ice cream." "Ahh, no thanks." "What, you don't like ice cream?" "Well, I do like ice cream, but I can't stand mint chocolate chip."
14:59
know-- now-- ow-- w-- w...
(I was trying to imitate the wall.)

« first day (802 days earlier)      last day (97 days later) »