« first day (31 days earlier)      last day (3376 days later) » 

12:47 AM
2015-02-20T00:48:00.696Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some. This is unlikely to happen
 
1:11 AM
Certainty level 0.4
testing the programmers (my) chat bot. I hope to get some scoring here — Simon André Forsberg 1 min ago
 
1:57 AM
Certainty level 0.44
My one and only issue with SO is how aggressive we are in closing questions. Take this one - I found it via a Google search, it's highly upvoted, and has an excellent and well-maintained accepted answer that was extremely helpful to me, a developer. Why close it then? This question has not proven to solicit debates, argument, polling or extended discussion. If it is closed, we reduce the body of knowledge that programmers have access to, which is the opposite of the spirit and intent of SO, IMHO. — Ryan Shripat 1 min ago
 
2:23 AM
Certainty level 0.4
Why code an applet? If it is due to the teacher specifying it, please refer them to Why CS teachers should stop teaching Java applets. — Andrew Thompson 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.4
My checklist for OpenGL programmers experiencing this problem: <cs.anu.edu.au/~Hugh.Fisher/3dteach/blackscreen.html>; Hope it helps — Hugh Fisher 1 min ago
 
3:17 AM
Certainty level 0.42000002
@GiannosAntoniou: That's wonderful, but Stack Overflow is not a software engineering Q&A site. It's a programming Q&A site. If you can be a little more specific (i.e. "we're thinking of doing X, is that a good idea?" instead of "what are some good ideas?"), this might be a good question for Programmers.SE. — Kevin 59 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
Upgrade to Yosemite, which is directly to involve programming tools including webstorm, virtual box, eclipse... ok... this is why I dislike stack overflow, too many NO practical experienced programmers here to waste their time to earn reputation points to make their CV looking good, and never have time to think about real valuable answers. — Ben P.P. Tung 13 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
Hi...stackoverflow, You don't need to put my question on hod. I won't change my question, or ... Please kill my account and all my answers here. You are just a site for some programmers to earn reputation points to get good job. I don't need good job. I just need to work productivity to make my life better. If You believe the question is not programming involved directly, please kill my account and all my answers. I can find my answers in Google and other communities ( virtual box, webstorm, eclipse..etc ) Good bye. — Ben P.P. Tung 1 min ago
 
4:25 AM
Certainty level 0.4
But anyway you go against the SO rules. For any programmers, if there is nothing that directly fits your requirements, build it. Not to mention you can find many wrapper already for Core Audio APIs, netcoreaudio.codeplex.comLex Li 2 mins ago
 
 
5 hours later…
8:59 AM
Certainty level 0.43
Should be migrated to programmers.stackexchange. See: programmers.stackexchange.com/search?q=big-oAlex 54 secs ago
 
9:11 AM
Certainty level 0.43
You may get more help at programmers stack exchange programmers.stackexchange.comTom Redfern 2 mins ago
 
9:35 AM
Certainty level 0.4
 
 
1 hour later…
10:41 AM
2015-02-20T10:42:00.709Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some. This is unlikely to happen
Certainty level 0.4
Sorry if my code is a pain guys, my first year in uni .... not the best of programmers — John 1 min ago
 
10:57 AM
Certainty level 0.4
From the Tour: Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. Maybe you can ask your professor or other students first. — ᵺṓᵯᶏᵴ 1 min ago
 
 
2 hours later…
12:35 PM
Certainty level 0.71999997
 
 
1 hour later…
1:53 PM
Certainty level 0.4
Certainty level 0.4
There's also the third possibility: sleeping even though you're not busy waiting, which is marginally evil. Some new programmers will do print("processing..."); sleep(3) so it makes it look like their program is thinking really hard ;-) — Kevin 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.4
@Joanes it is a high level question, only top programmers could understand. — Jada Stevens 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.4
@JadaStevens "it is a high level question, only top programmers could understand." Then you're in the wrong place here, we're all just dumbos. — πάντα ῥεῖ 1 min ago
 
2:47 PM
Certainty level 0.45000002
Your question is not on-topic for stack overflow, stack overflow is meant for programming issue, like code that gives you a headache. programmers.stackexchange.com is the place to ask question about software engineering advice and conceptual designs. — rckoenes 32 secs ago
 
3:05 PM
2015-02-20T15:06:00.535Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some. This is unlikely to happen
 
3:37 PM
Certainty level 0.4
NullReferenceException is a common situation for beginner programmers. The link provided should help you understand the problem. Then use the debugger to find what/where/when you have a variable that is null. — Soner Gönül 1 min ago
 
3:57 PM
Certainty level 0.43
@TanmayPatil: I was being a little bit sarcastic here. My point was that programmers just love to claim things about code performance without ever measuring execution speed, or without measuring it under realistic circumstances. — Christian Hackl 46 secs ago
2015-02-20T16:06:00.536Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some. This is unlikely to happen
 
4:23 PM
Certainty level 0.43
@AlexanderSolonik You know that's what programmers do :D — Rizier123 26 secs ago
Certainty level 0.48000002
@rckoenes - to be clear, this wouldn't be on topic for Programmers either. Programmers is a lot more about conceptual design issues than it is about advice. — GlenH7 2 mins ago
Certainty level 0.4
@Rizier123 hahaha , noo , thats what physic programmers do :D — Alexander Solonik 53 secs ago
 
4:47 PM
Certainty level 0.4
@ Hudixt You know all the programmers are using same approach for naming and conventions. . — Anil Baweja 1 min ago
 
5:18 PM
Certainty level 0.70000005
A generic "best practice" question like this might be better suited to programmers.stackexchange.com (but do read their Help Center and improve it before asking there). — jonrsharpe 1 min ago
 
6:15 PM
Certainty level 0.63
 
 
2 hours later…
8:27 PM
Certainty level 0.43
OTOH, some people caution against super, especially for new Python programmers (e.g., Lutz). I avoid it. — neuronet 14 secs ago
2015-02-20T20:38:00.394Z Quota has been reset. Was 8869 is now 9999
 
 
1 hour later…
9:55 PM
Certainty level 0.4
Depends what you mean by legitimate. Is it possible some programmers may choose to do it one way or the other? Yeah. Is it necessary for them to do that? No. In terms of implementation, though, it is necessary for the iterator to do the mapping between the underlying storage order and the order it presents. That's its job. Your insistence that the column-major iterator has the same set of indices as a row-major iterator is making your mapping ambiguous. And that makes it unusable, since it will prevent iterating over all array elements. — Rob 2 mins ago
Certainty level 0.4
@David, It seems like generally questions about problems with IDEs in general and problems with Xcode specifically get accepted here. According to the Help, questions about "software tools commonly used by programmers" are on topic. — BSMP 36 secs ago
 

« first day (31 days earlier)      last day (3376 days later) »