« first day (25 days earlier)      last day (57 days later) » 

12:10 AM
@AwalGarg Haha wow, how are you going to do that?
 
m59
12:28 AM
@ZachSaucier I found something pretty fascinating - kinda relevant to what was said earlier about not being able to perceive God for all He is (referring to the Father, for clarity here)
John 1:18
No one has ever seen God.
"No one" is translated from "oudeis", which as far as I can tell means an absolute negation of anything which could be posited.
Colossians 1:15
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
"invisible" has an association to faith and something which can only be spiritually perceived.
 
 
5 hours later…
5:16 AM
... nevermind
10 hours ago, by Zach Saucier
so, the question is where do absolute truths come from?
@AwalGarg ^^
waiting for the relation. I'll be back awake in a few hours
 
I will state the relation below:
We are different people and go through different situations, circumstances.
Those are the "sets" I talked about.
Each set has its own "laws", laws which have no proof.
We make assumptions about life, which are "theories"
life is constituted from those "sets", and thus, all our assumptions about life are theories which can be broken anytime.
But those laws don't break in the set they hold.
When I said that religion is just a set of rules, I meant that religion is constituted of those "laws".
Questioning those laws is meaning less again.
But since laws aren't necessarily universal, there is no point in forcing everyone to follow the same set of rules.
We all are different, our lives our different, the circumstances we go through are different, our thinking is different, and thus, the set of laws we follow should be different.
Now who will decide what set of laws we follow? We, ourselves.
Those set of laws, is what I call religion.
I discipline myself by following those laws.
And thus I said that "religion is a set of 'personal' rules"
Personal means that it is about me. It is to help me.
When one of my assumptions (theory) breaks, I no longer follow it.
Any actions (the experiments) I took in life based of those theories are then considered wrong/mistaken.
This doesn't mean that I should not make theories.
This just means that I should be open to truth.
As you see, from basic scientific lexical grammar, we derived one of the basic rules of morality!
We also now see that our assumptions can never be proven entirely true, but can only be made more and more reliable as time passes.
There is more to this @ZachSaucier @m59 for which I need you both to be here so that I can cross-question and you get my thoughts better.
@ZachSaucier from common sense
5 mins ago, by Awal Garg
As you see, from basic scientific lexical grammar, we derived one of the basic rules of morality!
^like this
 
m59
5:40 AM
@AwalGarg I can't accept anything you have said, nor would I even find reason to acknowledge it unless you can tell me why science is valid, since you're using the scientific method to make these claims.
Imagine if I said you "there is no reason for what I believe! I just do it and that's fine" and then said "oh, let me tell you all about it"
You wouldn't take me seriously.
You would say to me "you really ought to have reasons for believing things"
and that's what I have to say to you.
You told me all about the scientific method and your views about how that equates to morality and so on. I can validate science because I start my thinking with God as a foundation. Once again, I must ask - how do you know science is valid?
 
5:58 AM
@m59 You ask me?
11 hours ago, by m59
back, I agree totally with science.
 
m59
Yes, I do, and I can give a reason for it
You can't.
 
@m59 team work! State the reason and we are done!
 
m59
God knows everything and is all powerful, so he revealed logic and morality (so that we are sure logic is better than poor thinking) to us in such a way that is unmistakable so that we can be sure of these things.
 
dude......
 
m59
6:17 AM
Yes?
 
> God knows everything and is all powerful
You know how many times you have said this without any proof?
:P
also, when I had started this science thing, I first asked if we agree with science or not?
You agreed and thus I continued.
11 hours ago, by Awal Garg
@ZachSaucier Mind if I import('science').arguments in here?
11 hours ago, by Zach Saucier
sure, go ahead
ok it was Zach
 
m59
You still fail to understand me, even in the slightest.
You don't get to demand proof, Awal.
Proof depends on logic - you can't give a reason for logic - therefore you can't demand proof.
That's the insanity of what you believe.
I don't say that with any ill intent. I say it with great sympathy.
 
@m59 Ok, but I still don't know about the logic by which you say that God knows everything and is all powerful
 
m59
It honestly doesn't even matter, though I've given sufficient reason.
How can you demand logic when you can't give a reason logic needs to be presented?
 
And whenever I ask you about that, you start with assuming that god is omnipowerful... but this doesn't suit the needs of a discussion.
 
m59
6:27 AM
You already believe what I'm telling you, you just refuse to acknowledge it.
"doesn't suit the needs of a discussion"
according to what?
 
m59: X is true
awal: Proof?
m59: No proof, just logic.
awal: Logic?
m59: X is true
 
m59
How do you know?
 
this is what I interpret from what you said
 
m59
Oh, no I didn't say that.
God is who He says He is. He is eternal in all his attributes - knowledge, power, love, goodness, holiness (I might be forgetting something here)
He instilled logic and morality in us
I know of this.
I can use logic and morality justifiably.
You can use logic and morality justifiably for the same reason. The problem is that you say you don't know God.
You know.
And you suppress the truth so that you can use logic and morality without worshiping your creator that gave them to you.
So once again, you will say I'm wrong and try to use some kind of logic to say so, and I will once again ask "how do you know logic?" and you will be unable to answer.
Or
As is my desperate hope, you will turn from this insanity and recognize that we are incapable of denying God without becoming fools.
not my words - those are from God as well ^
"The fools says in his heart, 'There is no God'"
and I agree with God. It is mighty sad to see people that cannot even give an account of their use of logic!
Why do you think I spend hours and hours trying to tell you this!?
It truly breaks my heart for you.
 
6:48 AM
sry my internet went off for a while
i am here now
@m59 My sole aim to participate in this discussion is that I want to know a definitive answer (or a near definite one) to two of my questions.
 
m59
what questions?
 
1) (I can't phrase this one properly) What is the core root of people blindly believing in an unknown superficial bieng who goes against all common sense and material science?

2) What is the need of worshiping this bieng, whose existence is unconfirmed to me?
 
m59
How do you know it is unconfirmed to you?
what's "sense"?
Why does material science matter?
What's wrong with believing something blindly?
 
@m59 I have no confirmation, that's why.
 
m59
How do you know?
 
7:01 AM
@m59 What we think... I don't have a proper definition, a biology person can give it.
 
m59
How do you know they can give it?
What would they use in order to answer you?
Chaos?
or something else?
 
@m59 Because it is what we know. It is what is practical in sense.
@m59 really?
@m59 If I had a confirmation, I would know. Since I don't have it, I know that I don't have it.
 
m59
Here's the answer to everything: purple rainbow colored dragon socks.
Does that answer suit you?
 
@m59 Because I have studied that... :D
@m59 I don't know about that.
@m59 heh, what does that mean?
 
m59
It doesn't mean anything. It's nonsense.
But, nonsense is ok with you, right?
 
7:03 AM
lol
hold on, stay here, I will be back in a minute.
 
m59
Are you sure? ;D
You have replaced the God which created science with science itself.
You worship.
The problem with that is that science can't reveal things to you in an unmistakable way, nor does it know all things. It isn't a think which can know anything at all.
It is merely a tool, but you've given yourself to it.
 
hell let's simplify this
you believe in god because? (give a reason without assuming the presence of god)
your answer, you don't get to proof, right?
You say there is only logic
Now I ask you what is the logic?
 
m59
I believe in God because He revealed Himself to me.
the same reason you do.
 
@m59 in what form?
 
m59
in all ways which I have ever known.
 
7:11 AM
@m59 give one exact description.
 
m59
In the form of logic, morality, the entire physical universe, and an awareness which is further than that, which I both can't describe and am certain you have not experienced.
 
in other words, you worship the entire physical universe, logic, and morality eh?
 
m59
No, I said God revealed Himself through it.
 
@m59 "through it" or in the "form of it"?
 
m59
through
 
7:14 AM
So to correct what you said, "Through logic, morality, the entire physical universe, and an awareness which is further than that, which I both can't describe and am certain you have not experienced.", right?
 
m59
I am saying the revelation is "in the form of" not "God is in the form of"
What I said was fine, but whatever makes you happy.
 
ok then. Explain to me how he used the entire physical universe to reveal himself.
 
m59
I'm not positive.
 
what exactly did he do? What were his actions? And what and how did you infer from it?
 
m59
^ those, I am sure of.
Just like you are.
 
7:17 AM
@m59 You mean you don't know?
 
m59
Heh, I know as much as you. I'm just honest about it. I don't know "how". I certainly know "what".
 
@m59 "those"? what are you referring to?
 
m59
you're a human in this physical universe that demands to know what, and to have some kind of evidence.
that's my evidence.
 
@m59 Let me tell you something. You don't know the "how" because it didn't happen. It is just your imagination. Your theory, an assumption. Which is, IMO, not needed at all.
 
m59
How do you know?
 
7:20 AM
@m59 I would say that in a while, but you said you know the "what", so tell me what it is?
What were his actions that he revealed himself to you through the entire physical?universe. And what and how did you infer from it?
 
m59
We are undeniably logical and moral beings (though we fail at them, we still use them)
and if you say anything other than that God is the foundation of these things, your thinking descends into absurdity.
 
@m59 now where did this come from? See, this is again your imagination.
 
m59
Therefore I literally have no choice but to say that God exists and He is the source of logic, or I end up in the crazy situation you're in.
Heh, you like saying how things are, but you never give a reason.
 
@m59 You said the following
1 min ago, by m59
and if you say anything other than that God is the foundation of these things, your thinking descends into absurdity.
 
m59
Sure does.
 
7:23 AM
for which you gave no reason at all
 
m59
Oh, I have.
 
no logic
 
m59
I have a LOT.
Let me summarize what you've said in this chat.
 
@m59 if that is the reason, then sure. otherwise, before we wander down the road again, you give me a reason or a logic behind what you said in plain words.
 
m59
"Science helps us know things and find what's right and wrong (many claims to this effect" and "I can give no reason science is valid"
therefore, by your claims, you don't know anything
going around saying "this is the truth! and this other thing is the truth! I don't know anything at all!" is absurd.
I know you know things.
You know logic is the foundation for science.
You know logic has a foundation as well.
You know that foundation is God, just like I do.
But you will claim absurd things that make you sound like a fool, because you don't want to acknowledge the foundation.
Look into your heart.
Where you know that logic is true and good and that killing people is evil.
 
7:28 AM
You know what is the real foundation for science?
 
m59
And stop fighting the God that told you these things.
Yes, the real foundation for science is logic.
 
@m59 it is not
 
m59
LOL
We're done ;D
 
let me quote richard feynman on this
> I often use the analogy of a chess game: one can learn all the rules of chess, but one doesn't know how to play well. The present situation in physics is as if we know chess, but we don't know one or two rules. But in this part of the board where things are operation, those one or two rules are not operating much and we can get along pretty well without understanding those rules. That's the way it is, I would say, regarding the phenomena of life, consciousness and so forth.
And this is what is actually how science works.
This is how each and every single thing in science is laid.
 
m59
Do you know what logic is?
1: the law of identity
2: the law of non contradiction
3: the law of excluded middle
 
7:31 AM
@m59 I actually want to ask you that... what is it? I have only a vague picture of it.
 
m59
Again, what you have said is entirely insane.
 
@m59 I would be better if you used the message linking so that I know what you are pointing at...
 
m59
you denied that science requires logic as its foundation.
But, what difference does truth make in your worldview. We're all just meaningless stardust heading toward death in a universe that will inevitably decay.
 
@m59 I did, and I also gave you the real foundation.
Did you read that quote?
 
m59
I'm bowing out of this conversation. I'll pray that God helps you in your blindness. Goodnight!
 
 
6 hours later…
2:02 PM
I think what m59 is getting at is that both believing in God and believing that the world is here without the existence of a god takes faith, just in different ways
Taking a view that doesn't require a god is a theory, which cannot be proven and is not disprove yet. It has assumptions as the basis and you have to have faith in those assumptions and accept them, I'd argue blindly as you're trusting people you have never met and have not done the work yourself
7 hours ago, by Awal Garg
1) (I can't phrase this one properly) What is the core root of people blindly believing in an unknown superficial bieng who goes against all common sense and material science?

2) What is the need of worshiping this bieng, whose existence is unconfirmed to me?
in response to 1)
that's a terribly biased question that just shows your frustration and resistance to the idea
First off I hope you don't think we lack common sense and don't believe in science, we do
3
We've thought about the questions you've had and have answered them in our own minds, all that we've said, granted we weren't simply making a mistake, have passed our mental checks of sanity and common sense
Secondly, we're not "blindly" believing anything. The question of God has been on my mind daily since probably around the age of 13 or so
Just like science does, we have some basic assumptions (which in our minds are not assumptions, they are 100% true and we know this because God has given us the His insight, making us more like Him) that have to be taken into account when considering our argument. It takes faith to believe in those assumptions, just as it does in science
One of the biggest differences between believing in a world without a God and a world with one is a question of pride and meaning
the entire argument of existence without God is one that breeds an, "I'm the superior being, I don't need anyone to explain anything to me" mentality
we, as humans, don't like to admit we're wrong nor do we like to ask for help or say, "I don't know"
the simple fact is that we cannot know everything about the universe
People will refute the existence of a God so that they can continue living without an ultimate purpose in life, being held accountable to no higher being so morality and such are thrown out of the window
People don't want to agree that there is a being infinitely more intelligent and powerful than themselves, we want to be right and to not rely on others
You may argue that you have a meaning in life - to enjoy it and to continue living while not harming others - but ultimately without a God and without an afterlife all pursuits are futile. We may have fun and be a good person now, but what does that matter?
I can work as hard as I possibly can to be "good", yet in the end what does it get me without a God?
People here might recognize, "oh he's a 'good' guy"
I might get a certain type of girl to like me because I act that way
but what if I died today?
what do I have to look forward to?
why did I do the things I did?
you can argue it's for the betterment of ages to come, but ultimately that doesn't matter as well
firstly because all of us will die, thus life continuing for all eternity (in our universe- outside of a heaven or something) is impossible
secondly because in the ultimate spectrum of things our life on this earth is incredibly short. Both in terms of the life of our universe and our effect on the earth as a whole
even the most influential of people that have existed (which probability says we will not be one), from Newton to Ceaser to Mother Theresa to Hitler etc. ultimately don't themselves matter to our existence
If they were removed our world would not be exactly the same, but that is true for every person
someone else would have been doing the same types of things that they were, most likely, just not in the exact same way
Since even the most influential people ultimately could be done without, the same goes for all of us
In response to 2) from above
I worship God because, knowing what I do about Him, I have no other desire than to do so
He has taken my broken human self that can do nothing but wallow in my own destitution and continually sin and redeemed me, giving me His own righteousness. For that I owe him my life and all of my efforts and I gladly give Him that daily, for He is my savior, father, and friend. I can talk to Him personally and I can hear back from Him, though not audibly
I can see that such an incredibly detailed and complex world cannot come about my random happenings and chance. Things are too intricate and detailed for it to happen without someone or something guiding it (this is a different topic altogether that we can discuss later if it's necessary)
God is what makes me content in whatever I'm doing, for I know that my worth is in Him, not in anything of myself. That's not to say that I should do nothing because it doesn't matter, quite the opposite - I want to be a good representation of Christ
To believe in all that we have said, the argument for God, is a beautiful thing. It gives us meaning, value, and guidance that are impossible to have otherwise
that's precisely the reason why we spend out time talking to people about what we believe - because if you find out how truly good and true this news is you could do nothing but do the same as us
@AwalGarg o/
Sorry for the wall of text :P
 
2:52 PM
@ZachSaucier haha lemme read
@ZachSaucier did you see the relations I drew?
 
yes, but I can't say I agree with the conclusions such as "religion is a set of 'personal' rules"
 
@ZachSaucier no that is not a conclusion.
@ZachSaucier I like this argument that it takes faith to believe in those assumptions.
And I agree with it... atleast for now.
 
The only bad thing about a chat like this is that I can't go back and fix little thing like missing words and making messages more clear
 
@ZachSaucier that is far from generalizable. I don't believe in that bieng because I see no reason to.
If you or @m59 convince me about his existance with valid and definitive reasons, I promise you that I would join you both in educating others like me :)
So I disagree with whatever you said in that para and the related things.
 
3:05 PM
in order to do so you have to have faith in accepting the basic assumptions that we have just like you do in accepting a scientific theory
 
@ZachSaucier agreed with this point as well :)
@ZachSaucier no sane person accepts scientific theories as it is, not even me. There are hell lot of scientific, logical theories disregarded from stem, even though they seem pretty logical at first glance. A theory is accepted only if, 1) Doesn't contradicts the laws in its set 2) Is valid in a major set of cases. (or experiments, for that matter)
@ZachSaucier I have nothing to say in that... it too much subjective.
20 hours ago, by Awal Garg
(After about one year, I will be launching my second startup which would be a chat app for such discussions. Where many people can discuss many things without disrupting any thing. You both will get your invites.)
 
@AwalGarg I feel like there are chats that do that already
 
@ZachSaucier hmm, link?
 
SE chats, smaller chat programs like Miaou, FaceBook Rooms, etc.
 
ok
 
3:13 PM
you're free to do it, just sayin' :P
 
@ZachSaucier But I liked the fact that you started to discuss about absolute truths. I think if we can settle on that topic, we might get a better view on this god thing.
 
3:30 PM
@AwalGarg so where would you like to go from here then?
 
@ZachSaucier example of absolute truth on which we all 3 can agree
 
feel free to offer one :P
 
thinking of one :P
 
 
2 hours later…
m59
5:54 PM
Mercy, it's so hard to let it go.
The very valid definite reason I'm referring to is THAT YOU KEEP ASKING FOR VALID DEFINITIVE REASONS. I ask you why and you have no answer at all!!!
That very occurrence is the proof!
God said that if you don't start your thinking with Him, then you become a fool. Therefore, I say God is the foundation for thinking (logic) and He is why I know logic and use it to think well. He also says He is the moral foundation, so I define right and wrong by what He says. Therefore not only do I know of logic, I also know I should use it rather than say nonsense.
You have NO grounds on which to demand a logical argument to argue toward God because according to you, you can neither prove logic itself nor give a reason that someone ought to use it rather than speak nonsense.
There is no choice in this world - you can acknowledge God and thus be consistent in what you say and what you do, or you can deny Him and claim absurdity (use logic and morality continually to make truth claims all the while claiming you don't know anything at all, as you claim no foundation for logic or morality).
I was an atheist until I was 19. I understand your views. I once held them. I now assure you my thinking was insane and foolish and lost.
From God's words: "The fool says in his heart, 'there is no God'."
He wasn't kidding.
I was a Christian for 8 years before I realized that God meant that. If you deny Him, you can't explain anything at all, nor can you give a reason that explanations are even needed. Yet, you have done this over, and over again even while I point out to you that you have no defense.
Again, just to be sure I'm clear -
You say "I demand proof!"
and I say "prove to me that proof is needed!"
We believe proof is needed for things because we start our thinking with God - which gives us logic, which gives us all kinds of reasonable thoughts.
You don't get to demand proof until you can prove that proof is needed like we can.
 
 
2 hours later…
8:05 PM
fyi I'll not be around most of the weekend
 

« first day (25 days earlier)      last day (57 days later) »