« first day (14 days earlier)      last day (93 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

12:22 AM
@medica I'm not a native speaker and I've been reluctant about answering questions in ELU. Even though I had my post-grad. training in the US, I didn't live there long enough to feel qualified as a really knowledgeable person. However, I came across some very easy questions and tried to answer them. I got immediately downvoted and the comments didn't sound as if I were welcome in that área. Don't you think there should be some guidelines concerning non-native speakers answering questions ?
 
12:54 AM
Luis, would you be amenable to posting this highly relevant question in Election chat and let all of us address it? I think this is a great question.
OK.
@Luis First, Luis, please accept my deepest apologies for the feeling you have been made to feel.
 
@medica This.. is the election chat ;)
 
It is unfortunately a common experience with newcomers, so please know that you're not alone, and that you're not imagining things.
Before I address it directly, I want to thank you for putting yourself in that vulnerable place and not only going for it, but having the courage to come to someone with the sad result.
You are welcome here.
Everyone is welcome here.
This, unlike other sites, is not a forum for discussion.
It's supposed to be an impersonal question and answer site, one where questions and answers are judged on their own merits without regard for the person asking it;
That is, it stands or falls on it's own merits, equal to every one elses contributions.
We don't differentiate based on Native tongue or proficiency lever with the language.
For that reason, sometimes your answers will not meet the standards of expectations of some on this site.
 
user116848
It is very funny when people write this janitor Moderator
 
So, your first problem was how unwelcome you felt, and again I'm sorry.
 
user116848
lol
 
user116848
1:03 AM
:)
 
But you will understand, I hope, that this was no reflection on you, but only on your answer.
Comments, too, are supposed to be friendly.
They are supposed to be helpful and meant to help you revise your answer if need be, or to learn what are good answers here.
That's all that comments are supposed to do.
So, if you had some unwelcoming comments, again, I apologize, it's not supposed to happen.
I'll look at all your posts and make sure to flag for moderator attention any comments that crossed the line.
But we have thousands of members and very little control over what they write. :(
You asked: "Don't you think there should be some guidelines concerning non-native speakers answering questions ?"
No.
I don't.
I think there should be help and guidance from the community on how to help you improve your answer, and to help you learn this site's preferences regarding answers, our suggestions.
 
user116848
Well I am a non native and I gave some good answers to questions
 
Kindly kelp and guidance.
 
user116848
Although I ask questions too
 
But to have one standard for Native speakers and another for foreign speakers would be to accept questions that were not up a quality expected of all answers here.
It is nothing personal. I hope you understand this.
Here's what I do propose:
Before you retreat (which I hope you will not do, as I have liked your participatio here, and I'm sure others will have also,
Please familiarize yourself with EL&U by taking, first, the tour,
here, and then read in the help center, the section on answers.
That will give you an idea on the types of questions which typically get upvoted here.
 
user116848
1:16 AM
@medica I have a question
 
Also, if that seems too imtimidating, there is another site here, our sister site, {English Language Learners](ell.stackexchange.com); take their tour as well, and see if you might be more comfortable there.
@Arrowfar In a moment, please.:)
@Luis From what I remember, you would be fine at either site.
@Luis I've been doing all the "talking"; would you like to tell me what you think about what I've said?
@Luis Are you still here?
 
@medica Being a cardiologist, I'm pretty much used to following guidelines. I would find it easier if there were some, but as you said, moderators can do that job too, or even any other member who's been around very long.
 
@Luis OK, I will repost your question so not only the moderator candidates are aware of the problem, but also that our current moderators are as well.
Yes.
You know, I believe, that I'm a doctor as well (Emergency and Family Medicine).
We are accostumed to having relatively clear guidelines (relatively) for the choices we make.
This is much more ambiguous.
 
I've seen there are currently 5 moderators. How many are we going to have after these 3 new have been elected ? 8 moderators ? Or are some of them going to leave the position ?
 
If you do not find the help section actually helpful, we want to know that.
There will be 8 of us.
So there will be more eyes and more hands.
But as it is now, we rely on the users to do a lot of the moderation here.
That is the stack Exchange model.
It is unlikely to change, but there are some of us who definately believe this can be a friendlier and more welcoming place.
And in fact, are running for moderator on that very issue.
 
1:26 AM
That's good news. On the whole, I like the way the site works very much. It's only now and then that I come across something that may read as arrogance or vanity. But then again, written language isn't a good means of communication and very often we misunderstand someone's intentions.
 
Exactly. Also, what is normal and common in one culture may come across very differently in another.
 
Sure, there is that aspect too.
 
Here, there are English speakers from all over the world.
Some are brusque, some are very polite.
So there's that as well.
 
Yes, I've noticed that. The good thing is that the language is alive and I've learned a lot o new things I wouldn't find in books.
 
@Luis That's great news. That is what makes us happiest.
And that is one of the strongest things we have going as a site: the living language. Idioms, meanings, all kinds of things that are in use now. The history and origin of words. So much to learn.
 
1:32 AM
I wish you good luck and, sincerely, I hope you get elected. You've been very active. One last thing before I go (I'm a few hours ahead of you) Why did you change your nickname from Susan to medica ?
 
Ah, that is a rather personal choice I made. I wish I could tell you, but I can't. Rest assured, there was nothing duplicitous in the change. For several days, just to make sure there was continuity, I answered "a.k.a. Susan."
 
user116848
@medica How do I tell any specific person to come to chat here?
 
I see. Good luck again and good night.
 
@Arrowfar this is election chat. If you have a question, you can ask it or you can ping the moderator candidates and leave them your question. If you have a general question, ping all of us.
@Luis Is there anything else I can do for you?
 
user116848
@medica How to ping all of you?
 
1:36 AM
@Arrowfar :) @medica, @(name), @(name), @(name)... :-)
@Luis Buenos noches, y buena salud!
@AndrewLeach, @MrHen, @Matt Эллен, @Manhax, @Yoichi Oichi, @phenry, @oerkelens, @Fractured Retina. @luis asks: I'm not a native speaker and I've been reluctant about answering questions in ELU. Even though I had my post-grad. training in the US, I didn't live there long enough to feel qualified as a really knowledgeable person.
However, I came across some very easy questions and tried to answer them. I got immediately downvoted and the comments didn't sound as if I were welcome in that área. Don't you think there should be some guidelines concerning non-native speakers answering questions ?
 
 
1 hour later…
2:41 AM
0
Q: How curious are you? — or — Tallied ELU Asking Day Badges Proposal Results

tchristHow we fare in the new badge proposal In Asking days badges, there is a proposal to award to create a new trio of badges for asking questions. It revolves around the number of separate days that a user has a positive record of questions and asked good questions on that day. See the link for ...

 
2:55 AM
0
A: Asking days badges

tchristI ran the current criteria against the top 124 users on English Language & Users by reputation, and discovered that this would produce 2 golds, 20 silvers, and 75 bronzes. Here’s the table sorted on N, Reps as described in the original posting: Rank ID Name Re...

 Rank      ID Name                           Reps  N  Bronze   Silver     Gold
 ===================================================================================
   1.    3119 Yoichi Oishi ♢                21468 567 Curious Inquisitive Socratic
  15.    6006 MrHen ♢                       22264  44 Curious Inquisitive
  18.    8360 KitFox ♦                      18359  33 Curious Inquisitive
  28.     300 RegDwigнt ♦                   58211  23 Curious
  31.    3559 Matt Эллен ♢                  19454  21 Curious
Note how @YoichiOishi would be awarded the coveted Socratic gold badge.
 
 
2 hours later…
4:44 AM
@Mitch I like to clarify my statement "I really hope the downvotes were NOT cast by a single candidate" I did not mean to suggest the six/seven downvotes were cast by a single person. I know (after the first day) that it's one vote per person. I meant the consequent four downvotes, one on the "rankings" question and three downvotes on SEPARATE answers by SK. I did say to look at his profile.
If someone has understood and explained the misunderstanding to Mitch, thank you. If not, and there are people who really think I don't understand the system, then here is my explanation. Spelt (spelled) out.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:26 AM
@medica I concur with your answers to @Luis. Ultimately all voting is subjective, and it's not possible to legislate for it. Some may pick up on non-native turns of phrase; only they can justify whether that makes an answer incorrect or "not useful".
In principle, there should not be separate guidance for non-native users of English, because that enshrines a two-tier system.
(removed duplicate post, just in case you're wondering what it was)
Such guidance as there is applies to everyone. There may be a case for it to be revisited/revised.
 
6:52 AM
@tchrist has posted (with a link a to meta) on a topic which has been on the minds many of us many for a while: how do we improve the quality of questions? (And hopefully answers.) Is this a way to promote a more interesting and lively ELU?
While initially I was excited to read this, I do have some misgivings (detailed in this meta response). Ultimately, I’m concerned that this will weaken instead of strengthen ELU.
Badges for low-upvote answers might encourage a flurry of borderline questions as well as increase the resentment already common with down votes. Maybe we should try it. Maybe we should wait until we are more welcoming in general. I don't know. But because some don't visit meta, I'm posting this here for your consideration. Thanks.
 
I think it's only indirectly a moderation issue, as it highlights the need to vote down, close and delete poor questions. That should primarily be a community judgement (although I'm not averse to mods acting on egregious examples).
 
@Andrew - If I interrupted you, I apologize. If this is about @tchrist's post, I agree it is not a moderation issue.
As much as I would welcome another gold badge (or several) for top question poster Yoichi Oishi. :)
 
7:30 AM
No; it was about question badges not being directly an issue of moderation. I guess there's no reason why they should be awardable more than once (get a gold badge and the calculations start again).
 
8:01 AM
@AndrewLeach I agree
 
8:19 AM
Mari-LouA. I read your uncomfortable down-vote experience. I also suffered obstinate and pathological down-votes from two users last year up to early this year. They down-voted almost every question I casted. When I complained and asked for highly possible regular down-voters to stop this coward actions in Meta last year, one user nonchalantly admitted that he actually down-voted almost every other questions of mine. At that time someone, (perhaps J.R. , but my memory is obscure who it was now) choke with surprise, and asked the admitted down-voter “Did you down-vote so many of Yoichi’s que
@tchrist. I know Gold budge is more valuable than Silver and Copper. But I don't know what sub-categories, like curious, inquisitive. pundit, Socratic, notable, popular, publicist, etc. means. What is Socratic budge? Why is it "coveted."
 
8:42 AM
@YoichiOishi Moderators should certainly deal with serial downvoters who target particular users; but this needs the victim to raise the issue, if the automatic anti-vendetta correction stuff doesn't happen.
 
Hi
How to vote?
 
@Sudhir Go to english.stackexchange.com/election?cb=1 -- if you have enough reputation (I think you have), you will get buttons against each candidate.
 
How much reputation is required to vote?
 
8:48 AM
I couldn't remember what the nomination/voting levels were.
 
So this voting is for ELL or ES?
 
For additional moderators for ELU.
 
@MattЭллен: Seen you after long time. I hope you'd be doing good.
 
I'm fine. Hope you're good too.
 
Ya. So we can vote more than one candidate?
 
8:51 AM
you vote for your 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice
there will be 3 new moderators by the end of the day
 
For each user can I cast vote?
 
you can only cast 3 votes in total. Your first choice represents the person you most want to be a moderator.
your second vote represents the person you want second most as moderator
your third vote is for the person you want third most
 
I don't have much idea about the persons who're electing the contest.
Only 2 people I know well.
 
There is a Q&A post that will tell you more about each one, if you have time to read it!
also, you don't have to cast all three votes. I think you should, but if you only see two candidates you think would be good moderators, then only cast two votes.
 
Thanks Matt!
 
9:00 AM
no probs
 
Interesting to see persons having high reputation points are not contesting the elections.
 
@Sudhir Um...
How high is "high"?
 
I meant top 5.
 
But actually, it's not really about rep. Moderation is about flags and Meta stuff. Some people are interested in that drudge work; others like answering questions; a few do both.
 
exactly
 
9:03 AM
Yeah! Well said.
@MattЭллен: Is there any limit(repo point) to contest the election?
 
you have to have at least 300 reputation to nominate yourself
 
Oh I see
 
but nominations are now closed.
 
I think the idea to combine ELL and ELU would be great.
 
I'm not so sure about that. I find it debatable either way
 
9:09 AM
I've caste my vote.
 
Some people like John Lawler argue well that separating the sites is an affectation, designed to make people at EL&U feel smart and that the idea is that we are here to help people, not split up questions based on how "simplistic" we feel they are.
Other people, like me most of the time, think that questions that show a desire for hard and fast rules and questions about how to teach English deserve their own site and that EL&U should be about exploration and deeper understanding of what English is and how it came to be.
they're both good arguements (IMO)
 
Yeah! We're to help people who lacks in grammar portion of English.
Even being a non native speaker of English, I've problem in English.
 
of course, this topic has little to do with moderation. it's very much a community decision.
 
I guess both are correct, though not sure.
 
@Sudhir OK, if you'd like help with English, I can answer your questions, but we should do it in the main room, so as not to run amok in the Election chat room :)
 
9:15 AM
ok sure
 
 
4 hours later…
1:07 PM
@YoichiOishi There is a proposal on MSE to create badges for asking good questions. There would be a bronze one called Curious, a silver one called Inquisitive, and a gold one called Socratic. It is a proposal only, and is inviting comments. I ran the criteria against the public database, which does not include deleted questions, so my results may be a bit high, but I’m sure you are our #1 question-asker. That’s what your N=567 meant.
 
 
2 hours later…
2:45 PM
I want to personally thank all of our candidates for running in this election.
(so thank you)
In about 5 hours, three of you will be new mods, and the others will have earned the 'also-ran' appellation.
 
You mean the 'also-ran-away' appellation.
 
I hope that those of you who don't join our ranks will keep contributing to the site, and that you take away some valuable insight from the elections process.
I hope it encourages you to run again next time.
For those of you who are elected, here is what to expect:
 
@KitFox away? :)
 
You will know the result of the election within a few minutes after the polls close.
You will receive a notification in your inbox that contains the moderator agreement.
Take a good long look at it. Make sure you read it.
Think about it very carefully. You are allowed to decline.
Once you accept, you will turn blue and get a diamond.
The mods are announced in the Teacher's Lounge, so you will receive a ping especially to welcome you.
I will probably not be home from work yet, so I will greet you later.
You will also be able to see the EL&U mod room, which I have dusted off for the occasion, since I assume you will have questions.
You will also have two new menu items on your top bar: the diamond notices and the mod tools menu.
 
The non-winners will be even more sad after reading this.
 
2:54 PM
I know you will be giddy, but remember these are live from the moment you accept.
@Alraxite Will they? I thought it would be good to let everyone know what to expect.
I had no idea where to go or how to do anything when I first started.
 
@KitFox I mean, when they'll find out that they didn't make it.
 
@KitFox No, not really. Will the general public get to see the vote counts?
 
Yes.
 
@MrHen IIRC, the STV file is provided to the public.
I think that might have been how I found out I won.
 
@KitFox What's the ETA on that? Approx. a hour?
 
2:57 PM
Yeah, I remember checking the results last time
 
I thought it was immediate?
@MattЭллен It wasn't long until the notice though, right?
 
I can't remember
 
Actually, I can check the transcript for when they announced the mods in the TL.
It was 12 minutes after 8.
 
@KitFox Ah, thanks.
 
I hope I haven't forgotten anything.
That's 3pm Eastern? I could hang out a bit for that.
That doesn't seem like it could be right.
Four hours from now, though, right?
Well.
taps fingers
 
3:04 PM
um
I'm confused
 
Five. 2000 UTC is 2100 BST.
 
yeah!
the election page says 4
but it's wrong
 
Oh, probably 4:55.
So it's truncating or something.
 
This is the best turnout ever.
 
3:05 PM
It is! I'm happily surprised
 
Damn. I can't really hang out until 4. I'd have to leave at 2:30 to make it home in time...
checks calendar
Suddenly, my throat feels kind of sore.
 
minutely equine?
 
Yes.
 
It could be legit. I think my eldest has croup.
I had better get lunch and think about it.
brb
 
3:08 PM
CU
 
3:25 PM
Yum. Food.
Hi @Marthaª!
 
Hi Kit! Who should I vote for?
 
Everybody!
 
I know who's my #1 choice, but I keep vacillating on #2 and #3.
 
I bumped my #2 up to #1.
 
If only Evan Carroll had participated, we wouldn't be in such a dilemma.
He is funny.
 
3:43 PM
I agree. It gets tedious for the others though.
 
@Alraxite Thwack.
 
@KitFox So, when we get to see the STV file, I'm assuming it will have anonymized data. But will it show the 1st, 2nd, 3rd choices from the voters?
I think I'm more excited to look at the voting data than I am about finding out if I am elected. :/
 
@MrHen Yes, although it's all rather... complicated.
 
If I had the file from the last election, I would tell you.
 
@Marthaª That's why I like it!
 
3:47 PM
You'll need an STV viewer.
 
It shows each run.
So you won't see the names of the voters, naturally, but you'll see how the votes fall out.
@MrHen Here, on the old election page, you can get the results and application to view them.
So you can be prepared.
Wow, we have almost twice as many eligible voters this go around.
 
Which may go some way to explaining the higher turnout.
 
But almost five times the number of voters.
So more people actually voting.
 
@KitFox Odd; it's saying 137 voted but I only see 135 ballots when I open the file (in a text editor)
 
I see that.
I'm not sure about the discrepancy, unless some votes were invalidated.
I'm showing 134.
Hmm.
I keep getting that I didn't win.
It was a very close race.
Third place was decided by a single vote, iirc.
That's fascinating.
 
4:00 PM
@KitFox You have to set the STV viewer to use the same voting method as SE uses, otherwise you can get very different results.
 
Do you remember which it was though?
 
Commute. And then I have a rehearsal later. I'll see if I can get to the results in the break in the middle of it (or manufacture a break of my own).
 
Good luck!
 
@KitFox I thought I had a file somewhere on this here virtual machine, but I'm not finding it. Try all the methods until you find one where you win?
 
First	Second	Third
simchona	JSBձոգչ	KitFox
kiamlaluno	Martha
simchona	Matt Ellen	JSBձոգչ
simchona	Matt Ellen	KitFox
Martha	JSBձոգչ	J.R.
simchona	JSBձոգչ	Martha
simchona	kiamlaluno	Matt Ellen
J.R.	kiamlaluno	JSBձոգչ
Matt Ellen	JSBձոգչ	KitFox
kiamlaluno	Matt Ellen	Martha
JSBձոգչ	Matt Ellen	J.R.
Martha	JSBձոգչ
JSBձոգչ	kiamlaluno	simchona
IAdapter	KitFox	Martha
JSBձոգչ	KitFox	kiamlaluno
simchona	Martha	KitFox
JSBձոգչ	kiamlaluno	KitFox
Martha	J.R.	MetaEd
KitFox	simchona	Matt Ellen
kiamlaluno	Martha	simchona
Those were the ballots from the old election
If I processed the file correctly. (I don't have an STV app.)
 
4:05 PM
@MrHen There's a link to download OpenSTV at the old election page. It's a teeny-tiny program.
 
@Marthaª I'm on a work computer and don't feel like installing things. :)
 
See Voting system criteria here:
Instant-runoff voting (IRV), alternative vote (AV), transferable vote, ranked choice voting, or preferential voting is an electoral system used to elect a single winner from a field of more than two candidates. It is a preferential voting system in which voters rank the candidates in order of preference rather than voting for a single candidate. Ballots are initially distributed based on each elector's first preference. If a candidate secures more than half of votes cast, that candidate wins. Otherwise, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. Ballots assigned to the eliminat...
The places where STV fails are where it confuses people. Amongst others.
 
I just realized I barely edge out Yoichi Oishi for rep. Top three candidates by rep are Andrew Leach, Medica, and MrHen.
I wonder how many voters care about that number...
 
@MrHen Well, I care about it, to a point. Once the rep gets above 15K-20K, though, differences don't really matter.
 
I see my ballot!
 
4:16 PM
@KitFox You remember who you voted for that long ago? I sure don't.
 
I do. Well, I know I voted for myself.
Actually, maybe I didn't.
Oh. it shows me on the election tab for that election.
So I didn't need to remember.
 
@phenry Grammar questions can easily be so simple that they qualify as General Reference. For example, Is “Him are going with I” correct?” counts. We cannot be teaching the very most bits of English grammar here. That makes exactly as much sense as looking things up in the dictionary for people: in other words, none at all. They have to do their own work first, and they need to show that work, and they need to present their ideas or confusions.
 
4:36 PM
@tchrist I agree that that's a better fit for ELL, but how is it general reference? What's a generally-available reference source that is designed specifically to answer that sort of question?
 
@Marthaª Any book on English grammar, any book whatsoever.
 
@tchrist Generally-available, remember. Do you have a book on English grammar just lying around? I sure don't.
 
@Marthaª Yes, of course I do.
As shall any student of English.
Grammar can be GR.
 
Also, I've never met a grammar textbook that would fall under the definition of "reference source": they're designed to be read through from beginning to end, not for looking up specific topics. Even if the book has a good index, as phenry said: if you don't know the grammar, how do you even know what to look under?
But this isn't exactly election-related.
 
Well fine then, have it your way: condemn us to damnation.
I for one shall continue to close such things as GR, and encourage all others to do so. It has certainly been done often enough in the past.
Close-voting is certainly election-related, given the binding nature of a moderator’s vote.
 
4:43 PM
Our previous actions are what have earned us our current reputation, remember.
 
@tchrist So, which book do you have?
 
(Hint: our current reputation isn't very good.)
 
@Alraxite Well, there’s an Oxford English Grammar ten feet behind me propping the window open. There are more downstairs.
@Marthaª Yes, we have a reputation for drawing crappy questions. How are you planning on fixing that? By blessing the crappy questions? That won’t work at all.
 
@tchrist Okay.
 
@tchrist No, we have a reputation for rude, elitist behavior. Crappy questions are in the eyes of the beholder.
 
4:47 PM
@Marthaª I stand by my words, not by yours.
The number of help-vampires for English, and the number of people who know so little they cannot even ask a proper question, is unbounded and growing. ELU will only get worse and worse questions as time goes on.
 
@Marthaª, @tchrist, out of curiosity, where are each of you getting your impressions for ELU's reputation?
 
@MrHen Our meta.
 
@tchrist As in, just people's posts on meta? I'm sort of assuming @Marthaª's impressions are coming from meta as well. So... isn't it likely that both of you are as correct as the other?
 
Yes, absolutely.
 
@MrHen There’s enough weasel-wording there that any answer is possible.
 
4:51 PM
They are each pretty well representative of the two major viewpoints of the EL&U community.
 
@tchrist But you are still basing your impressions of ELU's reputation off of it?
 
@MrHen Our meta, other metas, my sister (who minored in linguistics and would be a much better contributor to this site than I can be, but who has been repeatedly chased off by our insularity)...
 
If we have a schism...
@Marthaª No! But she was sooo nice!
 
@Marthaª We also have North American posters.
 
@Marthaª I don't hang out ot ELU enough to follow comment trends or hear about it's "reputation", but a major reason for that is—in the eyes of this beholder a vast majority of the questions are crappy. I could try to put a definition to that but I'm note sure there would be a point. It's tho sort of thing you knew when you see it and it's a real turn off to a casual visitor looking to learn something from an expert. Are you trying to say in your view there is not an issue with LQ questions?
 
4:53 PM
@KitFox Yep, I agree with this. My point is that I find it strange that neither party seems to acknowledge the other side's legitimacy. Why are people turning this into an either-or issue?
 
They do that.
Orange v. Green.
Arsenal v. Manchester United.
Plants v. Zombies.
 
@MrHen Part of the problem is that the solution to one problem (closing crappy questions) leads directly to the other problem (unfriendliness).
 
@MrHen Not all of us have the patience to deal with an eternal September of four-year-olds’ questions in the sweet and kindly fashion necessary to send them off with an A for effort even if it’s an F question. Too much beating-around-the-bush.
 
Pirates v. Caribbean.
Peanut Butter v. Jelly.
Come on. No love? That's genius right there.
 
@Marthaª I don't necessarily agree with this. I think that most proposed solutions are being lazy and not explicitly addressing the other side. I believe there is a balance that can be struck between good quality questions and new user friendliness. My goal for the next era of ELU is to continue researching and pursuing such a solution.
2
 
4:56 PM
FOR SCIENCE!
coughs
 
@MrHen Which is why it's a Good Thing(TM) that you're running, and I'm not. :)
 
also-ran Martha.
giggles
 
@KitFox Shirley, you mean tunafish v. peanut-butter&jelly. As in a choice of turkey, pastrami, and tunafish and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, the curse of the sub-Oxonians.
 
@tchrist I can understand that but surely we can still do somewhat better than we have been.
On both fronts.
 
@Marthaª Actually, just seeing all those crappy questions leads to unfriendliness.
 
4:58 PM
I don't think that a lack of patience necessarily leads to being unwelcoming.
 
@tchrist I can't eat tunafish.
 
Because it is tiresome and tedious.
 
No, because it makes me vomit.
 
@tchrist I don't buy that as an excuse, sorry.
@tchrist I buy that and that is exactly what I want to focus on.
How do we make it less tiresome and tedious?
Because that will make the entire site better.
 
@MrHen It’s not “an excuse” and you are not sorry, so do not say what you are not.
 
4:59 PM
On both fronts.
 
@tchrist I tend to see that as a sign that I need to take a break, not as a sign that I need to close more questions.
 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (14 days earlier)      last day (93 days later) »