@medica I'm not a native speaker and I've been reluctant about answering questions in ELU. Even though I had my post-grad. training in the US, I didn't live there long enough to feel qualified as a really knowledgeable person. However, I came across some very easy questions and tried to answer them. I got immediately downvoted and the comments didn't sound as if I were welcome in that área. Don't you think there should be some guidelines concerning non-native speakers answering questions ?
It is unfortunately a common experience with newcomers, so please know that you're not alone, and that you're not imagining things.
Before I address it directly, I want to thank you for putting yourself in that vulnerable place and not only going for it, but having the courage to come to someone with the sad result.
You are welcome here.
Everyone is welcome here.
This, unlike other sites, is not a forum for discussion.
It's supposed to be an impersonal question and answer site, one where questions and answers are judged on their own merits without regard for the person asking it;
That is, it stands or falls on it's own merits, equal to every one elses contributions.
We don't differentiate based on Native tongue or proficiency lever with the language.
For that reason, sometimes your answers will not meet the standards of expectations of some on this site.
user116848
It is very funny when people write this janitor Moderator
But you will understand, I hope, that this was no reflection on you, but only on your answer.
Comments, too, are supposed to be friendly.
They are supposed to be helpful and meant to help you revise your answer if need be, or to learn what are good answers here.
That's all that comments are supposed to do.
So, if you had some unwelcoming comments, again, I apologize, it's not supposed to happen.
I'll look at all your posts and make sure to flag for moderator attention any comments that crossed the line.
But we have thousands of members and very little control over what they write. :(
You asked: "Don't you think there should be some guidelines concerning non-native speakers answering questions ?"
No.
I don't.
I think there should be help and guidance from the community on how to help you improve your answer, and to help you learn this site's preferences regarding answers, our suggestions.
user116848
Well I am a non native and I gave some good answers to questions
But to have one standard for Native speakers and another for foreign speakers would be to accept questions that were not up a quality expected of all answers here.
It is nothing personal. I hope you understand this.
Here's what I do propose:
Before you retreat (which I hope you will not do, as I have liked your participatio here, and I'm sure others will have also,
Please familiarize yourself with EL&U by taking, first, the tour,
here, and then read in the help center, the section on answers.
That will give you an idea on the types of questions which typically get upvoted here.
Also, if that seems too imtimidating, there is another site here, our sister site, {English Language Learners](ell.stackexchange.com); take their tour as well, and see if you might be more comfortable there.
@Arrowfar In a moment, please.:)
@Luis From what I remember, you would be fine at either site.
@Luis I've been doing all the "talking"; would you like to tell me what you think about what I've said?
@medica Being a cardiologist, I'm pretty much used to following guidelines. I would find it easier if there were some, but as you said, moderators can do that job too, or even any other member who's been around very long.
I've seen there are currently 5 moderators. How many are we going to have after these 3 new have been elected ? 8 moderators ? Or are some of them going to leave the position ?
That's good news. On the whole, I like the way the site works very much. It's only now and then that I come across something that may read as arrogance or vanity. But then again, written language isn't a good means of communication and very often we misunderstand someone's intentions.
@Luis That's great news. That is what makes us happiest.
And that is one of the strongest things we have going as a site: the living language. Idioms, meanings, all kinds of things that are in use now. The history and origin of words. So much to learn.
I wish you good luck and, sincerely, I hope you get elected. You've been very active. One last thing before I go (I'm a few hours ahead of you) Why did you change your nickname from Susan to medica ?
Ah, that is a rather personal choice I made. I wish I could tell you, but I can't. Rest assured, there was nothing duplicitous in the change. For several days, just to make sure there was continuity, I answered "a.k.a. Susan."
user116848
@medica How do I tell any specific person to come to chat here?
@Arrowfar this is election chat. If you have a question, you can ask it or you can ping the moderator candidates and leave them your question. If you have a general question, ping all of us.
@AndrewLeach, @MrHen, @Matt Эллен, @Manhax, @Yoichi Oichi, @phenry, @oerkelens, @Fractured Retina. @luis asks: I'm not a native speaker and I've been reluctant about answering questions in ELU. Even though I had my post-grad. training in the US, I didn't live there long enough to feel qualified as a really knowledgeable person.
However, I came across some very easy questions and tried to answer them. I got immediately downvoted and the comments didn't sound as if I were welcome in that área. Don't you think there should be some guidelines concerning non-native speakers answering questions ?
How we fare in the new badge proposal
In Asking days badges, there is a proposal to award to create a new trio of badges for asking questions. It revolves around the number of separate days that a user has a positive record of questions and asked good questions on that day.
See the link for ...
I ran the current criteria against the top 124 users on English Language & Users by reputation, and discovered that this would produce 2 golds, 20 silvers, and 75 bronzes.
Here’s the table sorted on N, Reps as described in the original posting:
Rank ID Name Re...
@Mitch I like to clarify my statement "I really hope the downvotes were NOT cast by a single candidate" I did not mean to suggest the six/seven downvotes were cast by a single person. I know (after the first day) that it's one vote per person. I meant the consequent four downvotes, one on the "rankings" question and three downvotes on SEPARATE answers by SK. I did say to look at his profile.
If someone has understood and explained the misunderstanding to Mitch, thank you. If not, and there are people who really think I don't understand the system, then here is my explanation. Spelt (spelled) out.
@medica I concur with your answers to @Luis. Ultimately all voting is subjective, and it's not possible to legislate for it. Some may pick up on non-native turns of phrase; only they can justify whether that makes an answer incorrect or "not useful".
In principle, there should not be separate guidance for non-native users of English, because that enshrines a two-tier system.
(removed duplicate post, just in case you're wondering what it was)
Such guidance as there is applies to everyone. There may be a case for it to be revisited/revised.
@tchrist has posted (with a link a to meta) on a topic which has been on the minds many of us many for a while: how do we improve the quality of questions? (And hopefully answers.) Is this a way to promote a more interesting and lively ELU?
While initially I was excited to read this, I do have some misgivings (detailed in this meta response). Ultimately, I’m concerned that this will weaken instead of strengthen ELU.
Badges for low-upvote answers might encourage a flurry of borderline questions as well as increase the resentment already common with down votes. Maybe we should try it. Maybe we should wait until we are more welcoming in general. I don't know. But because some don't visit meta, I'm posting this here for your consideration. Thanks.
I think it's only indirectly a moderation issue, as it highlights the need to vote down, close and delete poor questions. That should primarily be a community judgement (although I'm not averse to mods acting on egregious examples).
No; it was about question badges not being directly an issue of moderation. I guess there's no reason why they should be awardable more than once (get a gold badge and the calculations start again).
Mari-LouA. I read your uncomfortable down-vote experience. I also suffered obstinate and pathological down-votes from two users last year up to early this year. They down-voted almost every question I casted. When I complained and asked for highly possible regular down-voters to stop this coward actions in Meta last year, one user nonchalantly admitted that he actually down-voted almost every other questions of mine. At that time someone, (perhaps J.R. , but my memory is obscure who it was now) choke with surprise, and asked the admitted down-voter “Did you down-vote so many of Yoichi’s que…
@tchrist. I know Gold budge is more valuable than Silver and Copper. But I don't know what sub-categories, like curious, inquisitive. pundit, Socratic, notable, popular, publicist, etc. means. What is Socratic budge? Why is it "coveted."
@YoichiOishi Moderators should certainly deal with serial downvoters who target particular users; but this needs the victim to raise the issue, if the automatic anti-vendetta correction stuff doesn't happen.
There is a Q&A post that will tell you more about each one, if you have time to read it!
also, you don't have to cast all three votes. I think you should, but if you only see two candidates you think would be good moderators, then only cast two votes.
But actually, it's not really about rep. Moderation is about flags and Meta stuff. Some people are interested in that drudge work; others like answering questions; a few do both.
Some people like John Lawler argue well that separating the sites is an affectation, designed to make people at EL&U feel smart and that the idea is that we are here to help people, not split up questions based on how "simplistic" we feel they are.
Other people, like me most of the time, think that questions that show a desire for hard and fast rules and questions about how to teach English deserve their own site and that EL&U should be about exploration and deeper understanding of what English is and how it came to be.
@Sudhir OK, if you'd like help with English, I can answer your questions, but we should do it in the main room, so as not to run amok in the Election chat room :)
@YoichiOishi There is a proposal on MSE to create badges for asking good questions. There would be a bronze one called Curious, a silver one called Inquisitive, and a gold one called Socratic. It is a proposal only, and is inviting comments. I ran the criteria against the public database, which does not include deleted questions, so my results may be a bit high, but I’m sure you are our #1 question-asker. That’s what your N=567 meant.
I hope that those of you who don't join our ranks will keep contributing to the site, and that you take away some valuable insight from the elections process.
I hope it encourages you to run again next time.
For those of you who are elected, here is what to expect:
First Second Third
simchona JSBձոգչ KitFox
kiamlaluno Martha
simchona Matt Ellen JSBձոգչ
simchona Matt Ellen KitFox
Martha JSBձոգչ J.R.
simchona JSBձոգչ Martha
simchona kiamlaluno Matt Ellen
J.R. kiamlaluno JSBձոգչ
Matt Ellen JSBձոգչ KitFox
kiamlaluno Matt Ellen Martha
JSBձոգչ Matt Ellen J.R.
Martha JSBձոգչ
JSBձոգչ kiamlaluno simchona
IAdapter KitFox Martha
JSBձոգչ KitFox kiamlaluno
simchona Martha KitFox
JSBձոգչ kiamlaluno KitFox
Martha J.R. MetaEd
KitFox simchona Matt Ellen
kiamlaluno Martha simchona
Those were the ballots from the old election
If I processed the file correctly. (I don't have an STV app.)
Instant-runoff voting (IRV), alternative vote (AV), transferable vote, ranked choice voting, or preferential voting is an electoral system used to elect a single winner from a field of more than two candidates. It is a preferential voting system in which voters rank the candidates in order of preference rather than voting for a single candidate.
Ballots are initially distributed based on each elector's first preference. If a candidate secures more than half of votes cast, that candidate wins. Otherwise, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. Ballots assigned to the eliminat...
The places where STV fails are where it confuses people. Amongst others.
@phenry Grammar questions can easily be so simple that they qualify as General Reference. For example, Is “Him are going with I” correct?” counts. We cannot be teaching the very most bits of English grammar here. That makes exactly as much sense as looking things up in the dictionary for people: in other words, none at all. They have to do their own work first, and they need to show that work, and they need to present their ideas or confusions.
@tchrist I agree that that's a better fit for ELL, but how is it general reference? What's a generally-available reference source that is designed specifically to answer that sort of question?
Also, I've never met a grammar textbook that would fall under the definition of "reference source": they're designed to be read through from beginning to end, not for looking up specific topics. Even if the book has a good index, as phenry said: if you don't know the grammar, how do you even know what to look under?
@Alraxite Well, there’s an Oxford English Grammar ten feet behind me propping the window open. There are more downstairs.
@Marthaª Yes, we have a reputation for drawing crappy questions. How are you planning on fixing that? By blessing the crappy questions? That won’t work at all.
The number of help-vampires for English, and the number of people who know so little they cannot even ask a proper question, is unbounded and growing. ELU will only get worse and worse questions as time goes on.
@tchrist As in, just people's posts on meta? I'm sort of assuming @Marthaª's impressions are coming from meta as well. So... isn't it likely that both of you are as correct as the other?
@MrHen Our meta, other metas, my sister (who minored in linguistics and would be a much better contributor to this site than I can be, but who has been repeatedly chased off by our insularity)...
@Marthaª I don't hang out ot ELU enough to follow comment trends or hear about it's "reputation", but a major reason for that is—in the eyes of this beholder a vast majority of the questions are crappy. I could try to put a definition to that but I'm note sure there would be a point. It's tho sort of thing you knew when you see it and it's a real turn off to a casual visitor looking to learn something from an expert. Are you trying to say in your view there is not an issue with LQ questions?
@KitFox Yep, I agree with this. My point is that I find it strange that neither party seems to acknowledge the other side's legitimacy. Why are people turning this into an either-or issue?
@MrHen Not all of us have the patience to deal with an eternal September of four-year-olds’ questions in the sweet and kindly fashion necessary to send them off with an A for effort even if it’s an F question. Too much beating-around-the-bush.
@Marthaª I don't necessarily agree with this. I think that most proposed solutions are being lazy and not explicitly addressing the other side. I believe there is a balance that can be struck between good quality questions and new user friendliness. My goal for the next era of ELU is to continue researching and pursuing such a solution.
@KitFox Shirley, you mean tunafish v. peanut-butter&jelly. As in a choice of turkey, pastrami, and tunafish and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, the curse of the sub-Oxonians.